StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Drone.io vs Octopus Deploy

Drone.io vs Octopus Deploy

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Drone.io
Drone.io
Stacks884
Followers456
Votes258
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Stacks407
Followers493
Votes118

Drone.io vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Drone.io and Octopus Deploy

Drone.io is primarily a continuous integration and continuous delivery platform that focuses on the streamlined process of building, testing, and deploying code in a collaborative environment. In contrast, Octopus Deploy is a deployment automation tool that specializes in orchestrating the deployment of applications and infrastructure across various environments seamlessly. 

1. **Deployment vs. CI/CD**: One of the key differences between Drone.io and Octopus Deploy is their primary focus; while Octopus Deploy is specifically tailored for deployment automation, Drone.io excels in CI/CD processes from code development to deployment.

2. **Workflow Customization**: Octopus Deploy provides advanced workflow customization capabilities, such as deployment processes, approvals, and environmental specific configurations, allowing for complex deployments to be orchestrated effortlessly. On the other hand, Drone.io offers a more simplistic CI/CD pipeline setup, which may lack the extensive customization options provided by Octopus Deploy.

3. **Integration Ecosystem**: Octopus Deploy has a strong focus on integrations with various tools and platforms, making it versatile for different development environments. In comparison, while Drone.io also supports integrations with external tools, its integration ecosystem may not be as robust as Octopus Deploy's.

4. **License Model**: Another significant difference is the license model; Octopus Deploy typically follows a paid licensing model based on the number of deployment targets, whereas Drone.io is mainly open-source, providing a cost-effective solution for small to medium-sized teams or projects.

5. **Scalability and Enterprise Support**: Octopus Deploy is designed to cater to enterprise-grade deployments, offering comprehensive support for large-scale projects, complex deployment scenarios, and enterprise-level security features. In contrast, Drone.io may be more suitable for smaller teams or projects due to its scalability limitations.

6. **Ease of Use and Learning Curve**: While Octopus Deploy may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and capabilities, Drone.io is known for its ease of use and simplicity, making it more accessible to developers without extensive deployment automation experience. 

In Summary, Drone.io is a versatile CI/CD platform focusing on code development and deployment automation, while Octopus Deploy specializes in orchestrating complex deployment workflows with advanced customization options and robust integrations for enterprise-grade deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Drone.io, Octopus Deploy

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Drone.io
Drone.io
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Octopus Deploy helps teams to manage releases, automate deployments, and operate applications with automated runbooks. It's free for small teams.

Free for open-source;GitHub, BitBucket integration;Browser testing;Deplot with Amazon, Heroku, Google AppEngine;Flexible scripting;Team billing;
Deploy on-premises or to the cloud, securely;.NET, Java, PHP, Node, Ruby;Full API support;Approvals and manual intervention;Enable self-service deployments;Installs in minutes;Integrates with your build server;Free for small teams
Statistics
Stacks
884
Stacks
407
Followers
456
Followers
493
Votes
258
Votes
118
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Open source
  • 50
    Built on docker
  • 27
    Free for open source
  • 23
    GitHub integration
  • 18
    Easy Setup
Cons
  • 3
    Very basic documentation
Pros
  • 30
    Powerful
  • 25
    Simplicity
  • 20
    Easy to learn
  • 17
    .Net oriented
  • 14
    Easy to manage releases and rollback
Cons
  • 4
    Poor UI
  • 2
    Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)
  • 2
    Management of Config
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Heroku
Heroku
GitHub
GitHub
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
dotCloud
dotCloud
Jenkins
Jenkins
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jira
Jira
Appveyor
Appveyor
Bamboo
Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Drone.io, Octopus Deploy?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana