Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Elasticsearch vs Papertrail: What are the differences?
Introduction
This article provides a comparison between Elasticsearch and Papertrail, highlighting the key differences between the two. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine, while Papertrail is a cloud-based log management system.
Scalability: Elasticsearch is highly scalable, allowing for horizontal scaling across multiple nodes, which improves performance as the number of documents and users increase. On the other hand, Papertrail does not offer the same level of scalability as Elasticsearch, as it relies on a central server for log management.
Search Capabilities: Elasticsearch is known for its powerful search functionality, which includes advanced filtering, full-text search, and real-time search. It also offers various query types and supports complex querying capabilities. In contrast, Papertrail primarily focuses on log aggregation and storage, offering basic search functionalities like keyword search and log filters, but lacks the advanced querying capabilities of Elasticsearch.
Data Storage: Elasticsearch is designed to handle large volumes of structured and unstructured data efficiently, making it suitable for indexing and searching logs. It uses a distributed architecture that allows data to be distributed across multiple nodes for redundancy and improved performance. Papertrail, on the other hand, provides cloud-based log storage, which simplifies log management but may not be as performant or scalable for large volumes of data.
Analytics and Visualization: Elasticsearch offers built-in support for analytics and visualization, with the ability to create custom dashboards, visualizations, and perform aggregations on data. With its integration capabilities with various BI tools, it provides a comprehensive analytics solution. Papertrail focuses more on log storage and management, providing limited built-in analytics and visualization capabilities.
Security: Elasticsearch provides various security features, including role-based access control, encrypted communication, and authentication mechanisms, ensuring secure access to data and protecting against unauthorized access. Papertrail also offers security measures like SSL encryption, but it may not have the same level of advanced security features as Elasticsearch.
Use Cases: Elasticsearch is widely used for various applications, including search engines, logging and monitoring systems, data exploration, and data analytics. Its versatility makes it suitable for a wide range of use cases where real-time data analysis and search capabilities are required. Papertrail, on the other hand, is primarily used for log storage, analysis, and troubleshooting, making it more focused on log management use cases.
In summary, Elasticsearch offers scalability, powerful search capabilities, and advanced analytics and visualization features, making it suitable for complex search and analytics use cases. Papertrail, on the other hand, focuses on log management with basic search functionalities and is more suited for log storage and troubleshooting use cases.
Hey everybody! (1) I am developing an android application. I have data of around 3 million record (less than a TB). I want to save that data in the cloud. Which company provides the best cloud database services that would suit my scenario? It should be secured, long term useable, and provide better services. I decided to use Firebase Realtime database. Should I stick with Firebase or are there any other companies that provide a better service?
(2) I have the functionality of searching data in my app. Same data (less than a TB). Which search solution should I use in this case? I found Elasticsearch and Algolia search. It should be secure and fast. If any other company provides better services than these, please feel free to suggest them.
Thank you!
Hi Rana, good question! From my Firebase experience, 3 million records is not too big at all, as long as the cost is within reason for you. With Firebase you will be able to access the data from anywhere, including an android app, and implement fine-grained security with JSON rules. The real-time-ness works perfectly. As a fully managed database, Firebase really takes care of everything. The only thing to watch out for is if you need complex query patterns - Firestore (also in the Firebase family) can be a better fit there.
To answer question 2: the right answer will depend on what's most important to you. Algolia is like Firebase is that it is fully-managed, very easy to set up, and has great SDKs for Android. Algolia is really a full-stack search solution in this case, and it is easy to connect with your Firebase data. Bear in mind that Algolia does cost money, so you'll want to make sure the cost is okay for you, but you will save a lot of engineering time and never have to worry about scale. The search-as-you-type performance with Algolia is flawless, as that is a primary aspect of its design. Elasticsearch can store tons of data and has all the flexibility, is hosted for cheap by many cloud services, and has many users. If you haven't done a lot with search before, the learning curve is higher than Algolia for getting the results ranked properly, and there is another learning curve if you want to do the DevOps part yourself. Both are very good platforms for search, Algolia shines when buliding your app is the most important and you don't want to spend many engineering hours, Elasticsearch shines when you have a lot of data and don't mind learning how to run and optimize it.
Rana - we use Cloud Firestore at our startup. It handles many million records without any issues. It provides you the same set of features that the Firebase Realtime Database provides on top of the indexing and security trims. The only thing to watch out for is to make sure your Cloud Functions have proper exception handling and there are no infinite loop in the code. This will be too costly if not caught quickly.
For search; Algolia is a great option, but cost is a real consideration. Indexing large number of records can be cost prohibitive for most projects. Elasticsearch is a solid alternative, but requires a little additional work to configure and maintain if you want to self-host.
Hope this helps.
Pros of Elasticsearch
- Powerful api329
- Great search engine315
- Open source231
- Restful214
- Near real-time search200
- Free98
- Search everything85
- Easy to get started54
- Analytics45
- Distributed26
- Fast search6
- More than a search engine5
- Awesome, great tool4
- Great docs4
- Highly Available3
- Easy to scale3
- Nosql DB2
- Document Store2
- Great customer support2
- Intuitive API2
- Reliable2
- Potato2
- Fast2
- Easy setup2
- Great piece of software2
- Open1
- Scalability1
- Not stable1
- Easy to get hot data1
- Github1
- Elaticsearch1
- Actively developing1
- Responsive maintainers on GitHub1
- Ecosystem1
- Community0
Pros of Papertrail
- Log search85
- Easy log aggregation across multiple machines43
- Integrates with Heroku43
- Simple interface37
- Backup to S326
- Easy setup, independent of existing logging setup19
- Heroku add-on15
- Command line interface3
- Alerting1
- Good for Startups1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Elasticsearch
- Resource hungry7
- Diffecult to get started6
- Expensive5
- Hard to keep stable at large scale4
Cons of Papertrail
- Expensive2
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging1