StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub Enterprise vs Google Cloud Source Repositories

GitHub Enterprise vs Google Cloud Source Repositories

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Stacks500
Followers627
Votes10
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Stacks91
Followers160
Votes0

GitHub Enterprise vs Google Cloud Source Repositories: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between GitHub Enterprise and Google Cloud Source Repositories focusing on the key differences between the two platforms.

1. **Pricing Model**: GitHub Enterprise follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay a fixed fee for access to the platform's features. In contrast, Google Cloud Source Repositories offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the storage and data transfer usage.
2. **Integration with CI/CD Tools**: GitHub Enterprise offers seamless integration with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, and Travis CI, providing a comprehensive platform for automating build, test, and deployment processes. Google Cloud Source Repositories, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with Google Cloud Build, offering a streamlined experience for continuous integration and delivery workflows.
3. **Access Control and Security Features**: GitHub Enterprise provides robust access control mechanisms, allowing users to define granular permissions for repositories, branches, and pull requests. It also offers advanced security features such as code scanning and dependency vulnerability alerts. In comparison, Google Cloud Source Repositories offer similar access control capabilities but with a focus on Google Cloud IAM roles and permissions.
4. **Scalability and Performance**: GitHub Enterprise is known for its scalability and performance, with support for large codebases and high traffic repositories. Google Cloud Source Repositories leverages the scalability and reliability of Google Cloud Platform, offering high-performance repository hosting and version control capabilities.
5. **Community and Ecosystem**: GitHub Enterprise has a thriving community of developers, open-source projects, and third-party integrations, providing a rich ecosystem for collaboration and innovation. Google Cloud Source Repositories, while integrated with Google Cloud Platform services, may offer fewer community-driven resources and integrations compared to GitHub.
6. **Backup and Disaster Recovery**: GitHub Enterprise provides options for backup and disaster recovery, allowing users to maintain data redundancy and recover from unforeseen incidents. Google Cloud Source Repositories, being a Google Cloud service, offers built-in backup and recovery options leveraging the robust infrastructure of Google Cloud.

In Summary, GitHub Enterprise and Google Cloud Source Repositories differ in their pricing models, integration with CI/CD tools, access control and security features, scalability and performance, community and ecosystem support, as well as backup and disaster recovery capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise
Google Cloud Source Repositories
Google Cloud Source Repositories

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Collaborate easily and securely manage your code on a fully featured, scalable, private Git repository. Extend your Git workflow by connecting to other GCP tools, including Cloud Build, App Engine, Stackdriver, and Cloud Pub/Sub. Get access to fast, indexed powerful code search across all your owned repositories to save time.

Compliance and auditing;Hundreds of integrations;Flexible deployment;Centralized permissions;Powerful dashboards;Technical support
Unlimited private Git repositories;Deploy directly from Cloud Source Repositories;Automatically build and test your source code;Versioning and aliasing for serverless requests;Debug in production;Detailed audit logs;
Statistics
Stacks
500
Stacks
91
Followers
627
Followers
160
Votes
10
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Expensive - $$$
  • 2
    Code security
  • 2
    CDCI with Github Actions
  • 1
    Draft Pull Request
  • 1
    Both Cloud and Enterprise Server Versions available
Cons
  • 2
    $$$
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub
Google App Engine
Google App Engine
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Stackdriver
Stackdriver
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to GitHub Enterprise, Google Cloud Source Repositories?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana