StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Issue Tracking
  5. GitLab vs Jira

GitLab vs Jira

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

GitLab vs Jira: What are the differences?

  1. GitLab: GitLab is primarily a version control system that allows teams to collaborate on code and track changes. It offers features such as code repositories, issue tracking, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. GitLab provides a centralized platform for managing source code and streamlining development processes.
  2. Jira: Jira, on the other hand, is a comprehensive project management tool that helps teams track and manage tasks, issues, and projects. It offers features such as issue tracking, project planning, collaboration, and reporting. Jira is designed to support Agile methodologies and provides various project management frameworks like Scrum and Kanban.
  3. Integration with other tools: GitLab integrates with a wide range of tools and services, including popular ones like Slack, Jenkins, and Docker. This allows for seamless collaboration and automation within the development workflow. Jira also offers integrations with multiple tools, such as support for developer tools like Bitbucket and GitHub, development tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, and other business applications like Confluence and Trello.
  4. Code review and collaboration: GitLab provides built-in code review capabilities, allowing teams to collaborate and provide feedback on code changes. It offers features like inline commenting, merge requests, and code review approvals. Jira, on the other hand, focuses more on task management and issue tracking rather than code review. It provides features like issue workflows, user assignments, and issue prioritization.
  5. Accessibility: GitLab offers a self-hosted option, allowing organizations to deploy GitLab on their own infrastructure or cloud provider. This gives users more control over their data and ensures compliance with security and regulatory requirements. Jira is primarily a cloud-based solution, although it also offers a self-hosted option. However, self-hosted Jira requires additional setup and maintenance.
  6. Pricing: GitLab offers a robust free tier and the option to self-host, making it an attractive choice for small to medium-sized teams. It also provides paid plans with additional features for enterprise customers. Jira, on the other hand, has a more complex pricing structure with different tiers based on the number of users and features required. It can be more expensive, especially for larger organizations.

In summary, GitLab is primarily a version control system with built-in collaboration features, while Jira is a comprehensive project management tool with strong issue tracking capabilities. GitLab offers more flexibility in terms of integration and deployment options, while Jira provides a wider range of project management features but can be more expensive.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira
Jira
GitLab
GitLab

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
62.5K
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
49.5K
Followers
54.5K
Votes
1.2K
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Integrations
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jira, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana