Google Cloud Build vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Google Cloud Build

Stacks808

Followers207

Votes4

Google Cloud Build vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Google Cloud Build and Jenkins are two popular tools for implementing continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Let's explore the key differences between Google Cloud Build and Jenkins:

Deployment Platform: Google Cloud Build is a cloud-native CI/CD platform provided by Google Cloud, while Jenkins is an open-source automation server that can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud. Google Cloud Build offers a fully-managed solution that simplifies setup and maintenance, making it particularly suitable for cloud-native projects.
Integration with Google Cloud: As a part of Google Cloud, Cloud Build seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Storage, Container Registry, and Cloud Functions. This tight integration allows for streamlined workflows and simplified authentication and authorization. Jenkins, on the other hand, can integrate with various tools and platforms but requires additional configuration and plugins for Google Cloud-specific tasks.
Ease of Use: Google Cloud Build focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface and declarative configuration files. With its built-in triggers and automatic build management, it requires less manual setup and configuration compared to Jenkins. Jenkins offers a highly configurable environment but requires more manual effort for setup and maintenance, which can be more suitable for complex or customized CI/CD pipelines.
Scalability and Performance: Google Cloud Build leverages Google Cloud's infrastructure to scale automatically and handle high-demand workloads efficiently. It supports parallel builds and can distribute workloads across multiple machines for improved performance. Jenkins scalability relies on the deployed infrastructure, requiring manual scaling and optimized configuration for handling large-scale projects.
Pricing Model: Google Cloud Build follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources utilized, such as build minutes and storage. Pricing tiers are available to accommodate different workload sizes and expectations. In contrast, Jenkins is an open-source tool, and its pricing depends on the infrastructure and cloud provider chosen for deployment, considering compute and storage costs.
Ecosystem and Community Support: Jenkins benefits from a strong open-source community with a vast variety of plugins and integrations available, making it highly extensible and adaptable to different development ecosystems. Google Cloud Build has a smaller but growing ecosystem of extensions and community support, focused on Google Cloud technologies, making it the preferred choice for organizations relying heavily on the Google Cloud Platform.

In summary, Google Cloud Build distinguishes itself as a cloud-native, fully-managed CI/CD platform, tightly integrated with Google Cloud services, offering simplicity, scalability, and optimized pricing, while Jenkins offers great flexibility, extensibility, and community support for diversified environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Google Cloud Build

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Google Cloud Build
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Cloud Build lets you build software quickly across all languages. Get complete control over defining custom workflows for building, testing, and deploying across multiple environments such as VMs, serverless, Kubernetes, or Firebase.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Commit to deploy in minutes; Choose what to build; Extremely fast builds; Automate your deployments; Define your custom workflow; Unparalleled privacy; Native Docker support; Generous free tier; Powerful insights; Identify vulnerabilities; Build locally or in the cloud
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 808
Followers 50.4K	Followers 207
Votes 2.2K	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines 7 Lack of support	Pros 2 Container based 2 GCP easy integration Cons 2 Vendor lock-in

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Google Cloud Build?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Buddy

Git platform for web and software developers with Docker-based tools for Continuous Integration and Deployment.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

Google Cloud Build vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Deployment Platform: Google Cloud Build is a cloud-native CI/CD platform provided by Google Cloud, while Jenkins is an open-source automation server that can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud. Google Cloud Build offers a fully-managed solution that simplifies setup and maintenance, making it particularly suitable for cloud-native projects.
Integration with Google Cloud: As a part of Google Cloud, Cloud Build seamlessly integrates with other Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Storage, Container Registry, and Cloud Functions. This tight integration allows for streamlined workflows and simplified authentication and authorization. Jenkins, on the other hand, can integrate with various tools and platforms but requires additional configuration and plugins for Google Cloud-specific tasks.
Ease of Use: Google Cloud Build focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a user-friendly interface and declarative configuration files. With its built-in triggers and automatic build management, it requires less manual setup and configuration compared to Jenkins. Jenkins offers a highly configurable environment but requires more manual effort for setup and maintenance, which can be more suitable for complex or customized CI/CD pipelines.
Scalability and Performance: Google Cloud Build leverages Google Cloud's infrastructure to scale automatically and handle high-demand workloads efficiently. It supports parallel builds and can distribute workloads across multiple machines for improved performance. Jenkins scalability relies on the deployed infrastructure, requiring manual scaling and optimized configuration for handling large-scale projects.
Pricing Model: Google Cloud Build follows a usage-based pricing model, where users pay for the resources utilized, such as build minutes and storage. Pricing tiers are available to accommodate different workload sizes and expectations. In contrast, Jenkins is an open-source tool, and its pricing depends on the infrastructure and cloud provider chosen for deployment, considering compute and storage costs.
Ecosystem and Community Support: Jenkins benefits from a strong open-source community with a vast variety of plugins and integrations available, making it highly extensible and adaptable to different development ecosystems. Google Cloud Build has a smaller but growing ecosystem of extensions and community support, focused on Google Cloud technologies, making it the preferred choice for organizations relying heavily on the Google Cloud Platform.

Google Cloud Build vs Jenkins

Overview