StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Jenkins vs StackStorm

Jenkins vs StackStorm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
StackStorm
StackStorm
Stacks80
Followers186
Votes31
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks774

Jenkins vs StackStorm: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Jenkins and StackStorm

Jenkins and StackStorm are both popular automation tools that can be used in DevOps environments. However, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: Jenkins is a centralized automation server that executes tasks on remote machines through agents, while StackStorm relies on a centralized stackstorm-workflow engine that orchestrates tasks across different machines using plugins and actions. Essentially, Jenkins follows a master-slave architecture, whereas StackStorm follows a centralized workflow engine model.

  2. Workflow Automation: Jenkins is primarily designed for continuous integration and delivery, providing functionalities like build automation, testing, and deployment. On the other hand, StackStorm is more focused on event-driven automation, allowing the creation of complex workflows that integrate various tools and systems through event triggers and rules.

  3. Event-Driven Automation: StackStorm emphasizes event-driven automation, enabling the execution of actions and workflows based on specific events or triggers. In contrast, Jenkins relies more on scheduled or triggered executions through its build pipelines and job configurations.

  4. Integration and Extensibility: Jenkins has a large number of plugins that can be easily integrated with different tools, enabling extensive customization and integration options. StackStorm also provides integration capabilities through packs, which are collections of plugins and actions. However, Jenkins offers a wider range of integrations due to its extensive plugin ecosystem.

  5. Community and Support: Jenkins has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and user base, providing a wealth of resources, documentation, and support. StackStorm has a smaller but growing community, and while it is gaining popularity, it may have more limited resources and support available compared to Jenkins.

  6. Ease of Use: Jenkins has a more user-friendly and intuitive user interface, making it easier for beginners to set up and use. StackStorm, on the other hand, requires more technical knowledge and expertise to configure and utilize effectively, as it caters more to advanced users and developers.

In summary, Jenkins and StackStorm differ in their architecture, focus on workflow automation, event-driven automation capabilities, integration options, community and support, and ease of use. Understanding these differences can help organizations choose the most suitable automation tool based on their specific requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, StackStorm

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
StackStorm
StackStorm

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

StackStorm is a platform for integration and automation across services and tools. It ties together your existing infrastructure and application environment so you can more easily automate that environment -- with a particular focus on taking actions in response to events.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Automations tie events to actions you’d like to take, using a rules engine and, if you want, comprehensive workflow. Automations are your operational patterns summarized as code.;StackStorm automations work either by starting with your existing scripts – just add simple meta data – or by authoring the automations within StackStorm.;Automations are the heart of StackStorm – they allow you to share operational patterns, boost productivity, and automate away the routine.;CLI, REST API + Python Bindings
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
774
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
80
Followers
50.4K
Followers
186
Votes
2.2K
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Pros
  • 7
    Auto-remediation
  • 5
    Integrations
  • 4
    Complex workflows
  • 4
    Automation
  • 3
    Open source
Cons
  • 3
    Complexity
  • 1
    There are not enough sources of information
Integrations
No integrations available
Mailgun
Mailgun
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Rackspace Cloud Servers
Vault
Vault
Octopus Deploy
Octopus Deploy
Ansible
Ansible
Duo
Duo
PhantomJS
PhantomJS
Yammer
Yammer
Cassandra
Cassandra

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, StackStorm?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana