StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Issue Tracking
  5. JIRA vs Microsoft Teams

JIRA vs Microsoft Teams

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144

JIRA vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?

Key Differences between JIRA and Microsoft Teams

Introduction:

Here are the key differences between JIRA and Microsoft Teams.

  1. Integration with Software Development Process: JIRA is primarily a project management tool that is widely used in software development teams. It offers features like issue tracking, project management, and agile workflows. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams is a collaboration platform that focuses on team communication and collaboration. It allows users to chat, share files, and collaborate on documents in real-time. While JIRA is more focused on managing software development projects, Microsoft Teams provides a broader set of collaboration tools.

  2. Functionality and Use Cases: JIRA is specifically designed for managing software development projects and has a wide range of features tailored to support agile methodologies. It provides features like scrum boards, Kanban boards, burndown charts, and extensive customization options to cater to the needs of software development teams. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams is a versatile platform that can be used for various use cases beyond software development. It can be used for team communication, document collaboration, project coordination, and hosting virtual meetings.

  3. Communication and Collaboration: Microsoft Teams emphasizes real-time communication and collaboration features. It offers chat functionality, video conferencing, screen sharing, and document collaboration in one platform. Users can create different channels for specific topics or projects and have threaded conversations to keep discussions organized. JIRA, on the other hand, provides limited communication features and focuses more on managing the work and tracking issues.

  4. Third-Party Integration: JIRA has a wide range of integrations available with other tools commonly used in software development, such as version control systems, CI/CD tools, testing frameworks, and more. This allows for seamless automation and integration of various processes within the software development lifecycle. Microsoft Teams also provides integration options but is more focused on integrating with productivity tools like Office 365, SharePoint, and other Microsoft applications.

  5. Pricing Model: JIRA offers a flexible pricing model based on the number of users and the edition of the software. It offers different editions like JIRA Core, JIRA Software, and JIRA Service Desk, each with its own pricing. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams is included in the Office 365 suite and is available with different subscriptions like Office 365 Business, Office 365 Enterprise, and Office 365 Education. The pricing model is based on the overall Office 365 subscription, which includes various other applications and services.

  6. Target Audience: JIRA is mainly targeted towards software development teams and project managers who require specific features for managing agile projects and tracking issues. It is widely used in IT and software development companies. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, caters to a broader audience and can be used by teams from various domains and industries. It is suitable for organizations of all sizes looking for a versatile collaboration platform.

In Summary, JIRA is a specialized project management tool for software development, offering extensive features for agile methodologies, while Microsoft Teams is a collaboration platform that focuses on team communication and document collaboration, catering to a broader range of use cases and industries.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira, Microsoft Teams

Jakub
Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Sep 6, 2020

DecidedonYouTrackYouTrackJiraJiraLinearLinear

Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

524k views524k
Comments
carlche0616
carlche0616

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.

197k views197k
Comments
Jakub
Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

DecidedonYouTrackYouTrackJiraJiraJetBrains SpaceJetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira
Jira
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
Stacks
62.5K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
49.5K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
1.2K
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
  • 12
    Great integrations
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
Integrations
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Skype
Skype

What are some alternatives to Jira, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Telegram

Telegram

Users can send messages and exchange photos, videos, stickers, audio and files of any type. It provides instant messaging, simple, fast, secure and synced across all your devices.

Keybase Teams

Keybase Teams

Keybase is for anyone. Imagine a Slack for the whole world, except end-to-end encrypted across all your devices. Or a Team Dropbox where the server can't leak your files or be hacked.

Fleep

Fleep

Leave email behind and manage all conversations with your team, partners and clients in Fleep. If some of them are not Fleep users yet, they will receive all messages as normal emails.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack