Jira vs Miro

Overview

Jira

Stacks62.5K

Followers49.5K

Votes1.2K

Miro

Stacks1.1K

Followers580

Votes6

Jira vs Miro: What are the differences?

Integration with Other Tools: One key difference between Jira and Miro is their integration capabilities. Jira is known for its seamless integration with various development and project management tools, allowing teams to effortlessly connect their workflows and collaborate across different platforms. On the other hand, while Miro does offer some integrations, its focus is primarily on visual collaboration and ideation rather than integrations with other tools.
Task and Issue Tracking: Jira is well-known for its robust task and issue tracking functionalities. It offers detailed issue tracking, customizable workflows, and advanced reporting capabilities, making it highly suitable for software development and project management. In contrast, Miro does not provide the same level of task and issue tracking features. While it does offer the ability to create cards and add comments, it is not as comprehensive as Jira in terms of managing and tracking specific tasks and issues.
Visual Collaboration and Ideation: Miro distinguishes itself with its focus on visual collaboration and ideation. It provides a virtual whiteboard where teams can visually brainstorm ideas, create mind maps, wireframes, and diagrams, and collaborate in real-time. This visual aspect is not as prominent in Jira, which primarily focuses on project planning, issue tracking, and software development workflows.
Pricing Model: Jira and Miro also differ in their pricing models. Jira offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users, with different pricing options for small teams and large enterprises. Additionally, Jira provides options for both cloud-based and self-hosted deployments. In contrast, Miro follows a per-user, per-month pricing model, with different plans available for individuals, teams, and organizations.
Customizability and Extensibility: Jira offers extensive customizability, allowing teams to tailor their workflows, fields, and issue types to their specific requirements. It also provides an extensive marketplace of add-ons and plugins to enhance its functionality. In comparison, Miro has limited customizability options. While users can create custom templates and utilize various widgets, the overall flexibility and extensibility of Miro are not as comprehensive as Jira.
Target Audience and Use Cases: Jira is primarily targeted towards software development teams and project managers, offering comprehensive features specifically designed for agile project management. It is commonly used for tracking and managing software development tasks, bug tracking, and project planning. On the other hand, Miro is more focused on visual collaboration, making it suitable for a wide range of use cases including design thinking, brainstorming, remote collaboration, and agile ceremonies.

In Summary, Jira stands out with its extensive integration capabilities, robust task and issue tracking features, and its focus on software development workflows, while Miro excels in visual collaboration and ideation, offering a virtual whiteboard for teams to brainstorm and collaborate in real-time. The pricing models, customizability, and target audience of the two tools also differ significantly.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jira, Miro

Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

Decidedon

YouTrack

Jira

JetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira	Miro
Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.	It is a visual collaboration platform to create, collaborate, and centralize communication across your company on a single online whiteboard.
Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use	centralized hub for strategy and planning and ship more, faster; Ideate, organize insights, design flows, and collect feedback in real time; Keep everyone aligned, increase team throughput, and deliver better results
Statistics
Stacks 62.5K	Stacks 1.1K
Followers 49.5K	Followers 580
Votes 1.2K	Votes 6
Pros & Cons
Pros 310 Powerful 254 Flexible 149 Easy separation of projects 113 Run in the cloud 105 Code integration Cons 8 Rather expensive 5 Large memory requirement 2 Slow 1 Cloud or Datacenter only	Pros 4 Vector Canvas and Export 1 Very active community 1 Suitable for interactive presentations 0 Best visual collaboration tool for remote workshops
Integrations
Acunote Pivotal Tracker Bugsnag SnapEngage HipChat New Relic Zendesk Zopim UserVoice Balsamiq	Slack Confluence

What are some alternatives to Jira, Miro?

Ziflow

Created by the founders of ProofHQ, Ziflow's enterprise online proofing software helps brands and agencies deliver marketing projects faster by streamlining the review and approval of creative content, improving collaboration, centralizing feedback and eliminating manual steps through automated workflow. It replaces email, printouts and other ad-hoc methods for reviewing creative content with an enterprise-ready, pure-play online proofing solution.

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

Conceptboard

Share and discuss your ideas, documents and concepts visually in one place rather than exchanging endless e-mail attachments.

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

VersionOne

It is a formidable Agile management solution that is both comprehensive and versatile and developed for teams and projects of various scope and size. It is a compact platform that delivers outstanding performance in terms of managing and tracking multiple teams, tasks, and projects.

Quire

It is a modern task management app for creative teams. It lets you map out your big ideas, break them down into small steps, and tackle them one by one with your team.

Croquet

It is a platform that makes it easy to create high performance, Live Collaboration applications. Build interactive multiplayer experiences into your web apps and games.

Mantis

It is a free web-based bug tracking system. It provides a delicate balance between simplicity and power. Users are able to get started in minutes and start managing their projects while collaborating with their teammates and clients effectively.

YouTrack

A project management tool that can be adapted to your processes to help you deliver great products. Track tasks and bugs, plan sprints and releases, create workflows, and customize for your business processes.

Related Comparisons

Jira vs Miro: What are the differences?

Integration with Other Tools: One key difference between Jira and Miro is their integration capabilities. Jira is known for its seamless integration with various development and project management tools, allowing teams to effortlessly connect their workflows and collaborate across different platforms. On the other hand, while Miro does offer some integrations, its focus is primarily on visual collaboration and ideation rather than integrations with other tools.
Task and Issue Tracking: Jira is well-known for its robust task and issue tracking functionalities. It offers detailed issue tracking, customizable workflows, and advanced reporting capabilities, making it highly suitable for software development and project management. In contrast, Miro does not provide the same level of task and issue tracking features. While it does offer the ability to create cards and add comments, it is not as comprehensive as Jira in terms of managing and tracking specific tasks and issues.
Visual Collaboration and Ideation: Miro distinguishes itself with its focus on visual collaboration and ideation. It provides a virtual whiteboard where teams can visually brainstorm ideas, create mind maps, wireframes, and diagrams, and collaborate in real-time. This visual aspect is not as prominent in Jira, which primarily focuses on project planning, issue tracking, and software development workflows.
Pricing Model: Jira and Miro also differ in their pricing models. Jira offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users, with different pricing options for small teams and large enterprises. Additionally, Jira provides options for both cloud-based and self-hosted deployments. In contrast, Miro follows a per-user, per-month pricing model, with different plans available for individuals, teams, and organizations.
Customizability and Extensibility: Jira offers extensive customizability, allowing teams to tailor their workflows, fields, and issue types to their specific requirements. It also provides an extensive marketplace of add-ons and plugins to enhance its functionality. In comparison, Miro has limited customizability options. While users can create custom templates and utilize various widgets, the overall flexibility and extensibility of Miro are not as comprehensive as Jira.
Target Audience and Use Cases: Jira is primarily targeted towards software development teams and project managers, offering comprehensive features specifically designed for agile project management. It is commonly used for tracking and managing software development tasks, bug tracking, and project planning. On the other hand, Miro is more focused on visual collaboration, making it suitable for a wide range of use cases including design thinking, brainstorming, remote collaboration, and agile ceremonies.

Jira vs Miro

Overview