Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Mattermost vs Trello: What are the differences?
Comparison: Mattermost vs Trello
Mattermost and Trello are popular communication and collaboration tools used by individuals and teams. Both offer unique features that cater to different needs. Here are the key differences between Mattermost and Trello:
Purpose and Focus: Mattermost is primarily designed as a self-hosted team communication platform that offers real-time messaging, file sharing, and collaboration features, focusing on secure team communication. On the other hand, Trello is a widely used web-based project management tool that allows teams to manage tasks, projects, and workflow using boards, lists, and cards. Trello is highly visual and intuitive, making it suitable for project management and task tracking.
Hosting: Mattermost provides the option to self-host the platform on-premises or on a cloud server, giving more control over data privacy and security. Trello, on the other hand, is a cloud-based service hosted by Trello itself, relieving users from the hassle of setting up and maintaining the infrastructure.
Customizations and Integrations: Mattermost offers extensive customization options. Teams can customize the look and feel, add plugins, and integrate with various third-party tools to enhance their workflow. Trello, while not as customizable as Mattermost, provides a wide range of Power-Ups and integrations with other popular services like Slack, Google Drive, and JIRA, allowing users to extend its functionality.
Task and Project Management: Trello excels in task and project management, providing an intuitive board-based interface where users can create tasks as cards and organize them into lists and boards. It allows teams to set due dates, assign members, add attachments, and track progress easily. Mattermost, on the other hand, focuses more on real-time communication features and lacks the comprehensive task management capabilities of Trello.
User Interface and Accessibility: Mattermost offers a more traditional chat interface with real-time messaging, channels, and threads. It may require a bit of adaptation for users accustomed to more visual tools. Trello, with its card-based system and drag-and-drop functionality, provides a highly visual and user-friendly interface that is accessible to all team members, regardless of their technical skills.
Pricing Model: Mattermost offers both free and paid plans, with some limitations on the free version. The self-hosted option allows more flexibility in terms of scalability and data control. Trello offers a freemium model, providing a free version with core features and limitations, and premium paid plans for additional functionality and advanced features.
In summary, Mattermost is a self-hosted team communication tool with a strong focus on real-time messaging and collaboration, offering extensive customization options, while Trello is a web-based project management tool known for its visual and intuitive board-based interface, providing robust task and project management capabilities.
I'm comparing Aha!, Trello and Asana. We are looking for it as a Product Management Team. Jira handles all our development and storyboard etc. This is for Product Management for Roadmaps, Backlogs, future stories, etc. Cost is a factor, as well. Does anyone have a comparison chart of Pros and Cons? Thank you.
I just switched to ClickUp for my development agency - I am the product team, and I relay everything there betwixt designers, devs, and clients.
Clickup = Jira + Confluence but better - more ways to slice and dice your data & documents, make custom views, mind map relationships, and track people's work, plan goals... I even use it to manage project finances and household to-dos.
They have a very comprehensive free tier that never expires, and on top of that they're extremely generous with trials of their paid features, have more-than-fair pricing, and top-notch customer support.
Both Asana and Trello support Kanban style project tracking. Trello is Kanban-only project management, knowledge management, actually card-management tools. Asana is much more complex, supports different project management approaches, well integrated and helpful for any style/type project.
We choose Asana finally, but still some projects kept in Trello
Procezo is an excellent free-for-life task managing tool with several benefits. Its clear, user-friendly interface is perfect for small businesses and startups as well as enterprise-level use. It makes it a seamless transition from any other project management tools. Its simple but effective layout allows new users to quickly adapt to its ever-expanding set of features. Procezo allows users to create boards and provide access to users or teams as required, set priority and precedence of the task and allowing for subtasks and discussions to be created. With unlimited tasks, users, projects and free support, Procezo is quickly making its way into businesses from across the world and the ultimate growth hack tool.
I loved Slack. We used it for discussion. But somehow, it was always difficult to get things done. HeySpace is what replaced Slack and Trello as it combines the functionality of both tools.
So, now we keep on discussing as we did on slack, but once we to a point where we want to do something, we create tasks on a board and distribute them.
trello has a much simpler interface and easy to learn for any team member. asana might have more features and configuration options but do you really need a complex system for developers to manage tasks?
After Microsoft took over trello, it has become more restricted these days but still good for startups.
Keep it simple! Focus on your product, not tools.
Pros of Mattermost
- Open source60
- On-premise deployment41
- Free26
- Built using golang22
- Fast and easy to use21
- Docker image provided for easy setup14
- Full text search14
- Built using react12
- Supports multiple teams11
- Search and data archiving11
- Very professional11
- Keeps us focused, effective, concise8
- Clean and simple look7
- Integration with Gitlab7
- Webhooks support7
- Well documented6
- Use #Hashtags like Twitter6
- Import Slack logs3
- Reactive community and ease of use3
- Self managed data2
- On-premises Deployment2
- Secure2
- Markdown support1
- On premise installation1
- Kanban1
- Checklists1
- Slack-compatible integrations1
- Easy webhook integration1
Pros of Trello
- Great for collaboration715
- Easy to use628
- Free573
- Fast375
- Realtime347
- Intuitive237
- Visualizing215
- Flexible169
- Fun user interface126
- Snappy and blazing fast83
- Simple, intuitive UI that gets out of your way30
- Kanban27
- Clean Interface21
- Easy setup18
- Card Structure18
- Drag and drop attachments17
- Simple11
- Markdown commentary on cards10
- Lists9
- Integration with other work collaborative apps9
- Satisfying User Experience8
- Cross-Platform Integration8
- Recognizes GitHub commit links7
- Easy to learn6
- Great5
- Better than email4
- Versatile Team & Project Management4
- and lots of integrations3
- Trello’s Developmental Transparency3
- Effective3
- Easy2
- Powerful2
- Agile2
- Easy to have an overview of the project status2
- flexible and fast2
- Simple and intuitive2
- Name rolls of the tongue1
- Customizable1
- Email integration1
- Personal organisation1
- Nice1
- Great organizing (of events/tasks)1
- Easiest way to visually express the scope of projects0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Mattermost
- Less integrations and plugins than slack2
- Many basic features are enterprise only2
- Custom sidewide themes only in enterprise2
- Basic permissions only in enterprise edition1
- Not compatible with Telegram keys, which used by FSB1
Cons of Trello
- No concept of velocity or points5
- Very light native integrations4
- A little too flexible2