StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. MongoDB vs TimescaleDB

MongoDB vs TimescaleDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB
Stacks95.2K
Followers82.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars27.7K
Forks5.7K
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Stacks223
Followers374
Votes44
GitHub Stars20.6K
Forks988

MongoDB vs TimescaleDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

MongoDB and TimescaleDB are two popular database management systems with distinct features and use cases. They differ in multiple aspects, including data modeling approach, scalability, query language, indexing capabilities, and support for time-series data. Below are the key differences between MongoDB and TimescaleDB:

  1. Data Modeling Approach: MongoDB follows a flexible and schema-less document-based data model, where data is stored in BSON (Binary JSON) documents. It allows for dynamic schemas, making it suitable for unstructured data and agile development. On the other hand, TimescaleDB uses a relational data model with structured schema, enabling efficient organization and querying of time-series data.

  2. Scalability: MongoDB can scale horizontally by adding more servers to a cluster, utilizing sharding for distributing data across multiple nodes. It offers automatic data partitioning and load balancing, ensuring high availability and performance. In contrast, TimescaleDB is built on top of PostgreSQL and leverages its scalability features, such as PostgreSQL's native replication, streaming, and distributed query planning capabilities.

  3. Query Language: MongoDB uses a query language called MongoDB Query Language (MQL) to manipulate and retrieve data. MQL supports a wide variety of operations and provides powerful querying capabilities for unstructured and nested data. TimescaleDB, being based on PostgreSQL, utilizes its standard SQL language, enabling efficient and complex querying capabilities for time-series data.

  4. Indexing Capabilities: MongoDB provides a wide range of indexing options, including single-field, compound, and geospatial indexes. It also supports text search and secondary indexes for nested fields. TimescaleDB, as an extension of PostgreSQL, inherits its indexing capabilities, such as B-tree, Hash, and GiST indexes, to efficiently query time-series data that spans large time ranges.

  5. Support for Time-series Data: While MongoDB can handle time-series data to some extent, TimescaleDB is specifically designed and optimized for time-series workloads. TimescaleDB offers features like automatic partitioning based on time intervals, continuous aggregates for precomputed materialized views, and hypertables for efficient storing and querying of time-stamped data.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: MongoDB has a thriving open-source community and a rich ecosystem of libraries, tools, and frameworks that integrate well with the database. It has extensive documentation, user forums, and support resources. TimescaleDB, being a relatively newer technology, has a smaller community but is rapidly growing. It provides comprehensive documentation and actively maintains its open-source project.

In summary, MongoDB excels in flexible data modeling, horizontal scalability, and accommodating unstructured data, while TimescaleDB shines in efficiently managing and querying time-series data with its structured schema, specialized indexing, and built-in time-series optimizations.

Advice on MongoDB, TimescaleDB

George
George

Student

Mar 18, 2020

Needs adviceonPostgreSQLPostgreSQLPythonPythonDjangoDjango

Hello everyone,

Well, I want to build a large-scale project, but I do not know which ORDBMS to choose. The app should handle real-time operations, not chatting, but things like future scheduling or reminders. It should be also really secure, fast and easy to use. And last but not least, should I use them both. I mean PostgreSQL with Python / Django and MongoDB with Node.js? Or would it be better to use PostgreSQL with Node.js?

*The project is going to use React for the front-end and GraphQL is going to be used for the API.

Thank you all. Any answer or advice would be really helpful!

620k views620k
Comments
Ido
Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k
Comments
Mike
Mike

Mar 20, 2020

Needs advice

We Have thousands of .pdf docs generated from the same form but with lots of variability. We need to extract data from open text and more important - from tables inside the docs. The output of Couchbase/Mongo will be one row per document for backend processing. ADOBE renders the tables in an unusable form.

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

TimescaleDB: An open-source database built for analyzing time-series data with the power and convenience of SQL — on premise, at the edge, or in the cloud.

Flexible data model, expressive query language, secondary indexes, replication, auto-sharding, in-place updates, aggregation, GridFS
Packaged as a PostgreSQL extension;Full ANSI SQL;JOINs (e.g., across PostgreSQL tables);Complex queries;Secondary indexes;Composite indexes;Support for very high cardinality data;Triggers;Constraints;UPSERTS;JSON/JSONB;Ability to ingest out of order data;Ability to perform accurate rollups;Data retention policies;Fast deletes;Integration with PostGIS and the rest of the PostgreSQL ecosystem;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
27.7K
GitHub Stars
20.6K
GitHub Forks
5.7K
GitHub Forks
988
Stacks
95.2K
Stacks
223
Followers
82.0K
Followers
374
Votes
4.1K
Votes
44
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 829
    Document-oriented storage
  • 594
    No sql
  • 554
    Ease of use
  • 465
    Fast
  • 410
    High performance
Cons
  • 6
    Very slowly for connected models that require joins
  • 3
    Not acid compliant
  • 2
    Proprietary query language
Pros
  • 9
    Open source
  • 8
    Easy Query Language
  • 7
    Time-series data analysis
  • 5
    Established postgresql API and support
  • 4
    Reliable
Cons
  • 5
    Licensing issues when running on managed databases
Integrations
No integrations available
Prometheus
Prometheus
Equinix Metal
Equinix Metal
Ruby
Ruby
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Django
Django
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
pgAdmin
pgAdmin
Python
Python
Kafka
Kafka
Datadog
Datadog

What are some alternatives to MongoDB, TimescaleDB?

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase