Overview

Tornado

Stacks530

Followers409

Votes167

GitHub Stars22.3K

Forks5.5K

Node.js

Stacks200.4K

Followers164.5K

Votes8.5K

GitHub Stars114.1K

Forks33.7K

Node.js vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Introduction

Node.js and Tornado are both popular web frameworks used for building scalable and high-performance web applications. While they share similarities in their asynchronous nature and event-driven architecture, there are several key differences between the two frameworks.

Programming Language: Node.js is primarily built using JavaScript, which is a widely used language for both front-end and back-end web development. On the other hand, Tornado is built using Python, another popular programming language known for its simplicity and readability.
Concurrency Model: Node.js follows a single-threaded event loop architecture, where all I/O operations are non-blocking and handled asynchronously. This allows for efficient handling of concurrent requests. In contrast, Tornado follows a multi-threaded approach where multiple processes or threads are utilized for handling concurrent connections.
Scalability: Node.js is known for its excellent scalability due to its non-blocking I/O model. It can handle a large number of concurrent requests without sacrificing performance. Tornado, on the other hand, provides good scalability through its multi-threading approach, but it may not scale as efficiently as Node.js in certain scenarios.
Ease of Use: Node.js is often praised for its simplicity and ease of use. Since it uses JavaScript, which is a widely known language among developers, it has a large and active community providing extensive resources and libraries. Tornado, while also relatively easy to use, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with Python.
Performance: Node.js is known for its high-performance capabilities due to its non-blocking I/O architecture. It can handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently, making it suitable for applications that require real-time interactions. Tornado also performs well, but its multi-threaded approach may introduce some overhead in certain scenarios, making Node.js a preferred choice for performance-critical applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Node.js has a large and vibrant community, with a wide range of packages and libraries available in the npm registry. This extensive ecosystem allows developers to leverage existing tools and resources easily. Tornado, while having a smaller community compared to Node.js, still has a decent ecosystem with various libraries and packages available through its package manager, making it suitable for building Python-based web applications.

In Summary, Node.js and Tornado are both high-performance web frameworks but differ in programming language, concurrency model, scalability, ease of use, performance, and community support. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific requirements and familiarity of the development team.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Advice on Tornado, Node.js

abderrahmane

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

I am a front-end guy and in the last month I've been trynig to be learn backend in python. I think python is a great language to but when i start to learn django I didn't like it because everythong is already done for you, you dont need to do much make it works and I like coding thing that take me time. I've been thinking about switching to another programing language or just learn Node js and stick with it. I need to know if django is that easy.

136k views136k

Comments

Mohammad

Oct 28, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Laravel

PHP

I want to create a video sharing service like Youtube, which users can use to upload and watch videos. I prefer to use Vue.js for front-end. What do you suggest for the back-end? @{Node.js}|tool:1011| or @{Laravel}|tool:992| ( @{PHP}|tool:991| ) I need a good performance with high speed, and the most important thing is the ability to handle user's requests if the site's traffic increases. I want to create an algorithm that users who watch others videos earn points (randomly but in clear context) If you have anything else to improve, please let me know. For eg: If you prefer React to Vue.js. Thanks in advance

309k views309k

Comments

Zubair

Director at Aafiyah Technologies

Mar 12, 2020

Needs advice

Hi Team

I want your suggestions in order for me to decide which stack is suitable for the below-mentioned requirement.

Currently, I am considering building it in Wordpress (Starting with prebuilt plugins and develop on it)

But I am skeptical, so I am considering Laravel.

And recently I found one very good solution built in Angular, Node and MySQL

Here are the high-level goals I am trying to achieve:

The system has 3 modules

Multi-Vendor e-commerce Market Place
Peer to peer Selling of used items
Listing/ Directory kind of portal for the service industry

290k views290k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Tornado	Node.js
By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.	Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.3K	GitHub Stars 114.1K
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks 33.7K
Stacks 530	Stacks 200.4K
Followers 409	Followers 164.5K
Votes 167	Votes 8.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros 37 Open source 31 So fast 27 Great for microservices architecture 20 Websockets 17 Simple Cons 2 Event loop is complicated	Pros 1439 Npm 1279 Javascript 1129 Great libraries 1012 High-performance 805 Open source Cons 46 Bound to a single CPU 45 New framework every day 40 Lots of terrible examples on the internet 33 Asynchronous programming is the worst 24 Callback
Integrations
Python	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Node.js?

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.