Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting  logo

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting

LambdaTest, BrowserStack, TestComplete, Selenium, and Karma are the most popular alternatives and competitors to CrossBrowserTesting .
36
40
+ 1
0

What is CrossBrowserTesting and what are its top alternatives?

It's implemented to ensure a website's functionality and design and includes testing a range of devices and operating systems being used in the market and customer base.
CrossBrowserTesting is a tool in the Browser Testing category of a tech stack.
CrossBrowserTesting is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to CrossBrowserTesting 's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real browsers and devices in a single cloud platform—and at scale. ...

  • TestComplete
    TestComplete

    It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • Sauce Labs
    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

  • WebdriverIO
    WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read. ...

  • Playwright
    Playwright

    It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast. ...

CrossBrowserTesting alternatives & related posts

LambdaTest logo

LambdaTest

533
181
204
LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
533
181
+ 1
204
PROS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
CONS OF LAMBDATEST
    Be the first to leave a con

    related LambdaTest posts

    Sarah Elson
    Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 426.4K views

    @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

    See more
    Sarah Elson
    Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 110.2K views
    Shared insights
    on
    SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
    at
    Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

    Selenium LambdaTest

    See more
    BrowserStack logo

    BrowserStack

    2.7K
    2K
    434
    BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications
    2.7K
    2K
    + 1
    434
    PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
    • 131
      Multiple browsers
    • 71
      Ease of use
    • 59
      Real browsers
    • 40
      Ability to use it locally
    • 23
      Good price
    • 17
      Great web interface
    • 15
      IE support
    • 13
      Official mobile emulators
    • 12
      Cloud-based access
    • 11
      Instant access
    • 8
      Real mobile devices
    • 5
      Selenium compatible
    • 5
      Multiple Desktop OS
    • 4
      Can be used for Testing and E2E
    • 4
      Screenshots
    • 3
      Video of test runs
    • 3
      Pre-installed developer tools
    • 2
      Many browsers
    • 2
      Webdriver compatible
    • 2
      Favourites
    • 2
      Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
    • 1
      Cypress Compatible
    • 1
      Free for Open Source
    CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
    • 2
      Very limited choice of minor versions

    related BrowserStack posts

    Zarema Khalilova
    Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 235.1K views

    I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

    See more
    TestComplete logo

    TestComplete

    33
    54
    0
    The Easiest-to-Use Automated UI Testing Tool with Artificial Intelligence
    33
    54
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF TESTCOMPLETE
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF TESTCOMPLETE
        Be the first to leave a con

        related TestComplete posts

        Selenium logo

        Selenium

        14K
        11K
        522
        Web Browser Automation
        14K
        11K
        + 1
        522
        PROS OF SELENIUM
        • 172
          Automates browsers
        • 154
          Testing
        • 101
          Essential tool for running test automation
        • 24
          Remote Control
        • 24
          Record-Playback
        • 8
          Data crawling
        • 7
          Supports end to end testing
        • 6
          Functional testing
        • 6
          Easy set up
        • 4
          The Most flexible monitoring system
        • 3
          End to End Testing
        • 3
          Easy to integrate with build tools
        • 2
          Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
        • 2
          Record and playback
        • 2
          Compatible with Python
        • 2
          Easy to scale
        • 2
          Integration Tests
        • 0
          Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
        CONS OF SELENIUM
        • 8
          Flaky tests
        • 4
          Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
        • 1
          Update browser drivers

        related Selenium posts

        Kamil Kowalski
        Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 1.8M views

        When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

        See more
        Benjamin Poon
        QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 951.7K views

        For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

        With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

        See more
        Karma logo

        Karma

        2.7K
        593
        181
        Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
        2.7K
        593
        + 1
        181
        PROS OF KARMA
        • 61
          Test Runner
        • 35
          Open source
        • 27
          Continuous Integration
        • 22
          Great for running tests
        • 18
          Test on Real Devices
        • 11
          Backed by google
        • 5
          Easy Debugging
        • 2
          Remote Control
        CONS OF KARMA
        • 1
          Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
        • 1
          Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

        related Karma posts

        Sai Chaitanya Mankala
        Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 182.7K views

        Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

        We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

        See more

        Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

        Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

        See more
        Sauce Labs logo

        Sauce Labs

        307
        430
        438
        Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
        307
        430
        + 1
        438
        PROS OF SAUCE LABS
        • 60
          Selenium-compatible
        • 46
          Webdriver compatible
        • 35
          Video recordings of every test
        • 31
          Qa
        • 29
          Mobile support
        • 26
          Any programming language
        • 23
          Developer tools
        • 21
          Test local and firewalled servers
        • 20
          Jenkins integration
        • 18
          Pristine VMs
        • 17
          CI Compatible
        • 11
          Appium support
        • 9
          Parallel testing
        • 8
          Rapid environment preparation
        • 8
          Mobile device support
        • 7
          Easy testing on almost any device
        • 7
          Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
        • 6
          Secure testing and easy setup
        • 5
          Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
        • 5
          Quick support response
        • 4
          Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
        • 4
          Easy to setup and understand,
        • 3
          Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
        • 3
          Maintained browser matrix
        • 3
          Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
        • 2
          Efficient tool to verify product quality
        • 2
          Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
        • 2
          Hany for platform testing
        • 2
          Great documentation
        • 2
          Generous free trial
        • 2
          Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
        • 2
          Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
        • 2
          Simplicity of Sauce-connect
        • 1
          Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
        • 1
          It's great for my QA work
        • 1
          Awesome tech support
        • 1
          Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
        • 1
          Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
        • 1
          Depth of integrations
        • 1
          Because of its cloud based support for appium
        • 1
          Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
        • 1
          QE support
        • 1
          Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
        • 1
          Secure testing
        • 1
          Cheaper than browserstack
        • 1
          Stable
        • 0
          Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
        CONS OF SAUCE LABS
        • 2
          Relatively slow
        • 2
          Expensive

        related Sauce Labs posts

        Shared insights
        on
        Sauce LabsSauce LabsSeleniumSelenium

        I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

        I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

        See more
        Zarema Khalilova
        Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 235.1K views

        I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

        See more
        WebdriverIO logo

        WebdriverIO

        293
        473
        39
        Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js
        293
        473
        + 1
        39
        PROS OF WEBDRIVERIO
        • 11
          Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
        • 9
          Open Source
        • 8
          Great community
        • 7
          Easy to setup
        • 4
          Best solution for broad browser support
        CONS OF WEBDRIVERIO
        • 8
          High maintenance

        related WebdriverIO posts

        Raziel Alron
        Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 314.9K views

        Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

        See more
        Kevin Roulleau
        QA Engineer Freelance at happn · | 5 upvotes · 449.6K views

        I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

        See more
        Playwright logo

        Playwright

        233
        424
        75
        Node library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API (By Microsoft)
        233
        424
        + 1
        75
        PROS OF PLAYWRIGHT
        • 13
          Cross browser
        • 9
          Open source
        • 9
          Test Runner with Playwright/test
        • 7
          Well documented
        • 7
          Promise based
        • 5
          Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
        • 5
          Execute tests in parallel
        • 5
          API Testing
        • 4
          Python Support
        • 4
          Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
        • 3
          Context isolation
        • 3
          Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
        • 1
          Fastest
        CONS OF PLAYWRIGHT
        • 11
          Less help
        • 2
          Node based
        • 1
          Does not execute outside of browser

        related Playwright posts