Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting  logo

Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting

LambdaTest, BrowserStack, TestComplete, Selenium, and Karma are the most popular alternatives and competitors to CrossBrowserTesting .
37
41
+ 1
0

What is CrossBrowserTesting and what are its top alternatives?

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based cross-browser testing platform that allows users to test their websites and web applications on different browsers and operating systems. Key features include real-time testing, automated testing, visual testing, and manual testing. However, some limitations of CrossBrowserTesting include limited integrations with third-party tools and higher pricing compared to some competitors.

  1. BrowserStack: BrowserStack offers a similar cross-browser testing solution with a wide range of browsers and devices to test on. It includes features like automated testing, live testing, and responsive testing. Pros include a large device and browser library, but cons may include higher pricing for some users.

  2. LambdaTest: LambdaTest is another cloud-based platform for cross-browser testing. It provides features such as automated testing, real-time testing, and responsive testing. Pros of LambdaTest include a user-friendly interface, while cons might be limitations in customization options.

  3. Sauce Labs: Sauce Labs is a cloud-based testing platform that offers cross-browser testing capabilities. It includes features like automated testing, analytics, and debugging tools. Pros of Sauce Labs include a robust infrastructure for testing, but cons may include higher pricing for some users.

  4. TestingBot: TestingBot is a cloud-based testing platform that allows users to perform cross-browser testing. It offers features such as automated testing, manual testing, and visual testing. Pros of TestingBot include a large selection of browsers and devices, while cons may include limited support for some frameworks.

  5. Ghost Inspector: Ghost Inspector is a testing automation tool that includes cross-browser testing capabilities. It offers features like automated testing, visual testing, and browser compatibility testing. Pros of Ghost Inspector include an easy-to-use interface, while cons might be fewer customization options compared to other tools.

  6. Applitools: Applitools is a visual testing tool that provides cross-browser testing capabilities. It offers features like AI-powered visual testing, automated testing, and responsive testing. Pros of Applitools include advanced visual testing capabilities, while cons may include higher pricing for some users.

  7. Browsera: Browsera is a website testing tool that focuses on cross-browser compatibility testing. It offers features like automated testing, visual testing, and compatibility reporting. Pros of Browsera include detailed compatibility reports, but cons may include limited integrations with third-party tools.

  8. Ranorex Studio: Ranorex Studio is a test automation tool that includes cross-browser testing capabilities. It provides features like automated testing, manual testing, and visual testing. Pros of Ranorex Studio include advanced automation features, while cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  9. SmartBear CrossBrowserTesting: SmartBear CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based testing platform that offers cross-browser testing solutions. It includes features like automated testing, live testing, and visual testing. Pros of SmartBear CrossBrowserTesting include integration with other SmartBear tools, but cons may include limited customization options.

  10. Eggplant: Eggplant is a digital automation intelligence tool that includes cross-browser testing capabilities. It offers features like AI-powered testing, automated testing, and visual testing. Pros of Eggplant include advanced AI capabilities for testing, while cons may include higher pricing for some users.

Top Alternatives to CrossBrowserTesting

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. ...

  • TestComplete
    TestComplete

    It is an automated UI testing tool that makes it fast and easy to create, maintain, and execute functional tests across desktop, web, and mobile applications. With TestComplete, you can increase test coverage and ensure you ship high-quality, battle-tested software ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • Playwright
    Playwright

    It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast. ...

  • WebdriverIO
    WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read. ...

  • Sauce Labs
    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

CrossBrowserTesting alternatives & related posts

LambdaTest logo

LambdaTest

538
198
204
LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
538
198
+ 1
204
PROS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
CONS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support

related LambdaTest posts

Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 756.4K views

@producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

See more
Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 127.3K views
Shared insights
on
SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
at
Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

Selenium LambdaTest

See more
BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack

2.7K
2K
498
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, & optimize...
2.7K
2K
+ 1
498
PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 134
    Multiple browsers
  • 75
    Ease of use
  • 63
    Real browsers
  • 43
    Ability to use it locally
  • 26
    Good price
  • 20
    Great web interface
  • 18
    IE support
  • 16
    Official mobile emulators
  • 14
    Instant access
  • 14
    Cloud-based access
  • 11
    Real mobile devices
  • 7
    Selenium compatible
  • 7
    Screenshots
  • 7
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 6
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 5
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 4
    Video of test runs
  • 3
    Webdriver compatible
  • 3
    Many browsers
  • 3
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 3
    Favourites
  • 2
    Cypress Compatible
  • 2
    Test automation dashboard
  • 2
    Unify and track test cases
  • 2
    Free for Open Source
  • 2
    Test Management
  • 2
    Cross-browser testing
  • 2
    Bi-directional Jira Sync
  • 1
    Speed is fast
  • 1
    Real devices
  • 0
    Web accessibility
  • 0
    Test WCAG Compliance
  • 0
    Visual testing and review
CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions

related BrowserStack posts

Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 292.9K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more
TestComplete logo

TestComplete

35
57
0
The Easiest-to-Use Automated UI Testing Tool with Artificial Intelligence
35
57
+ 1
0
PROS OF TESTCOMPLETE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF TESTCOMPLETE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related TestComplete posts

      Selenium logo

      Selenium

      15.4K
      12.3K
      525
      Web Browser Automation
      15.4K
      12.3K
      + 1
      525
      PROS OF SELENIUM
      • 175
        Automates browsers
      • 154
        Testing
      • 101
        Essential tool for running test automation
      • 24
        Record-Playback
      • 24
        Remote Control
      • 8
        Data crawling
      • 7
        Supports end to end testing
      • 6
        Easy set up
      • 6
        Functional testing
      • 4
        The Most flexible monitoring system
      • 3
        End to End Testing
      • 3
        Easy to integrate with build tools
      • 2
        Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
      • 2
        Record and playback
      • 2
        Compatible with Python
      • 2
        Easy to scale
      • 2
        Integration Tests
      • 0
        Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
      CONS OF SELENIUM
      • 8
        Flaky tests
      • 4
        Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
      • 2
        Update browser drivers

      related Selenium posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 3.9M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Benjamin Poon
      QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 1.9M views

      For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

      With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

      See more
      Karma logo

      Karma

      2.5K
      602
      181
      Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
      2.5K
      602
      + 1
      181
      PROS OF KARMA
      • 61
        Test Runner
      • 35
        Open source
      • 27
        Continuous Integration
      • 22
        Great for running tests
      • 18
        Test on Real Devices
      • 11
        Backed by google
      • 5
        Easy Debugging
      • 2
        Remote Control
      CONS OF KARMA
      • 1
        Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
      • 1
        Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

      related Karma posts

      Sai Chaitanya Mankala
      Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 861.7K views

      Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

      We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

      See more

      Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

      Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

      See more
      Playwright logo

      Playwright

      410
      533
      76
      Node library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API (By Microsoft)
      410
      533
      + 1
      76
      PROS OF PLAYWRIGHT
      • 13
        Cross browser
      • 10
        Open source
      • 9
        Test Runner with Playwright/test
      • 7
        Promise based
      • 7
        Well documented
      • 5
        Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
      • 5
        Execute tests in parallel
      • 5
        API Testing
      • 4
        Python Support
      • 4
        Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
      • 3
        Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
      • 3
        Context isolation
      • 1
        Fastest
      CONS OF PLAYWRIGHT
      • 12
        Less help
      • 3
        Node based
      • 2
        Does not execute outside of browser

      related Playwright posts

      Lily Goykhman
      Engineering management at SB · | 3 upvotes · 25.5K views
      Shared insights
      on
      PlaywrightPlaywrightPuppeteerPuppeteer

      Test automation - Puppeteer is used currently, just rudimentary stuff, but considering the better choices with Playwright?

      See more

      We are planning to automate our test cases for the application written in AngularJS. Which tool would you suggest we use for automation, Playwright or WebdriverIO?

      See more
      WebdriverIO logo

      WebdriverIO

      341
      504
      40
      Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js
      341
      504
      + 1
      40
      PROS OF WEBDRIVERIO
      • 11
        Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
      • 10
        Open Source
      • 8
        Great community
      • 7
        Easy to setup
      • 4
        Best solution for broad browser support
      CONS OF WEBDRIVERIO
      • 8
        High maintenance

      related WebdriverIO posts

      Raziel Alron
      Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 2M views

      Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

      See more
      Kevin Roulleau
      QA Engineer Freelance at happn · | 5 upvotes · 989.7K views

      I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

      See more
      Sauce Labs logo

      Sauce Labs

      313
      434
      438
      Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
      313
      434
      + 1
      438
      PROS OF SAUCE LABS
      • 60
        Selenium-compatible
      • 46
        Webdriver compatible
      • 35
        Video recordings of every test
      • 31
        Qa
      • 29
        Mobile support
      • 26
        Any programming language
      • 23
        Developer tools
      • 21
        Test local and firewalled servers
      • 20
        Jenkins integration
      • 18
        Pristine VMs
      • 17
        CI Compatible
      • 11
        Appium support
      • 9
        Parallel testing
      • 8
        Rapid environment preparation
      • 8
        Mobile device support
      • 7
        Easy testing on almost any device
      • 7
        Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
      • 6
        Secure testing and easy setup
      • 5
        Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
      • 5
        Quick support response
      • 4
        Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
      • 4
        Easy to setup and understand,
      • 3
        Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
      • 3
        Maintained browser matrix
      • 3
        Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
      • 2
        Efficient tool to verify product quality
      • 2
        Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
      • 2
        Hany for platform testing
      • 2
        Great documentation
      • 2
        Generous free trial
      • 2
        Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
      • 2
        Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
      • 2
        Simplicity of Sauce-connect
      • 1
        Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
      • 1
        It's great for my QA work
      • 1
        Awesome tech support
      • 1
        Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
      • 1
        Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
      • 1
        Depth of integrations
      • 1
        Because of its cloud based support for appium
      • 1
        Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
      • 1
        QE support
      • 1
        Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
      • 1
        Secure testing
      • 1
        Cheaper than browserstack
      • 1
        Stable
      • 0
        Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
      CONS OF SAUCE LABS
      • 2
        Relatively slow
      • 2
        Expensive

      related Sauce Labs posts

      Shared insights
      on
      Sauce LabsSauce LabsSeleniumSelenium

      I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

      I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

      See more
      Zarema Khalilova
      Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 292.9K views

      I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

      See more