Alternatives to GameSparks logo

Alternatives to GameSparks

PlayFab, Photon, Firebase, React Native, and Flutter are the most popular alternatives and competitors to GameSparks.
25
50
+ 1
0

What is GameSparks and what are its top alternatives?

The unity of the server-side. GameSparks is a cloud-based development platform for games developers enabling them to build all of their game's server-side
GameSparks is a tool in the Game Development category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to GameSparks

  • PlayFab
    PlayFab

    It unlocks a new world of creativity for game developers by providing a cross-platform "backend-as-a-service" built exclusively for games. We give game developers the tools, technologies, and know-how they need to have a trouble-free launch day, and profitable day-to-day operations after that. ...

  • Photon
    Photon

    The fastest way to build beautiful Electron apps using simple HTML and CSS. Underneath it all is Electron. Originally built for GitHub's Atom text editor, Electron is the easiest way to build cross-platform desktop applications. ...

  • Firebase
    Firebase

    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds. ...

  • React Native
    React Native

    React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native. ...

  • Flutter
    Flutter

    Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android. ...

  • Ionic
    Ionic

    Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript. ...

  • Unity
    Unity

    Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers. ...

  • Xamarin
    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

GameSparks alternatives & related posts

PlayFab logo

PlayFab

37
86
0
Complete backend platform for live games
37
86
+ 1
0
PROS OF PLAYFAB
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF PLAYFAB
      Be the first to leave a con

      related PlayFab posts

      Photon logo

      Photon

      28
      88
      0
      Framework for Electron apps
      28
      88
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF PHOTON
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF PHOTON
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Photon posts

          Firebase logo

          Firebase

          40.1K
          34.4K
          2K
          The Realtime App Platform
          40.1K
          34.4K
          + 1
          2K
          PROS OF FIREBASE
          • 371
            Realtime backend made easy
          • 270
            Fast and responsive
          • 242
            Easy setup
          • 215
            Real-time
          • 191
            JSON
          • 134
            Free
          • 128
            Backed by google
          • 83
            Angular adaptor
          • 68
            Reliable
          • 36
            Great customer support
          • 32
            Great documentation
          • 25
            Real-time synchronization
          • 21
            Mobile friendly
          • 18
            Rapid prototyping
          • 14
            Great security
          • 12
            Automatic scaling
          • 11
            Freakingly awesome
          • 8
            Chat
          • 8
            Angularfire is an amazing addition!
          • 8
            Super fast development
          • 6
            Built in user auth/oauth
          • 6
            Firebase hosting
          • 6
            Ios adaptor
          • 6
            Awesome next-gen backend
          • 4
            Speed of light
          • 4
            Very easy to use
          • 3
            Great
          • 3
            It's made development super fast
          • 3
            Brilliant for startups
          • 2
            Free hosting
          • 2
            Cloud functions
          • 2
            JS Offline and Sync suport
          • 2
            Low battery consumption
          • 2
            .net
          • 2
            The concurrent updates create a great experience
          • 2
            Push notification
          • 2
            I can quickly create static web apps with no backend
          • 2
            Great all-round functionality
          • 2
            Free authentication solution
          • 1
            Easy Reactjs integration
          • 1
            Google's support
          • 1
            Free SSL
          • 1
            CDN & cache out of the box
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Large
          • 1
            Faster workflow
          • 1
            Serverless
          • 1
            Good Free Limits
          • 1
            Simple and easy
          CONS OF FIREBASE
          • 31
            Can become expensive
          • 16
            No open source, you depend on external company
          • 15
            Scalability is not infinite
          • 9
            Not Flexible Enough
          • 7
            Cant filter queries
          • 3
            Very unstable server
          • 3
            No Relational Data
          • 2
            Too many errors
          • 2
            No offline sync

          related Firebase posts

          Stephen Gheysens
          Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.8M views

          Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

          My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

          See more
          Tassanai Singprom

          This is my stack in Application & Data

          JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

          My Utilities Tools

          Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

          My Devops Tools

          Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

          My Business Tools

          Slack

          See more
          React Native logo

          React Native

          32.8K
          28.5K
          1.1K
          A framework for building native apps with React
          32.8K
          28.5K
          + 1
          1.1K
          PROS OF REACT NATIVE
          • 211
            Learn once write everywhere
          • 171
            Cross platform
          • 167
            Javascript
          • 122
            Native ios components
          • 69
            Built by facebook
          • 65
            Easy to learn
          • 45
            Bridges me into ios development
          • 39
            It's just react
          • 39
            No compile
          • 36
            Declarative
          • 22
            Fast
          • 13
            Virtual Dom
          • 12
            Insanely fast develop / test cycle
          • 12
            Livereload
          • 11
            Great community
          • 9
            It is free and open source
          • 9
            Native android components
          • 9
            Easy setup
          • 9
            Backed by Facebook
          • 7
            Highly customizable
          • 7
            Scalable
          • 6
            Awesome
          • 6
            Everything component
          • 6
            Great errors
          • 6
            Win win solution of hybrid app
          • 5
            Not dependent on anything such as Angular
          • 5
            Simple
          • 4
            Awesome, easy starting from scratch
          • 4
            OTA update
          • 3
            As good as Native without any performance concerns
          • 3
            Easy to use
          • 2
            Many salary
          • 2
            Can be incrementally added to existing native apps
          • 2
            Hot reload
          • 2
            Over the air update (Flutter lacks)
          • 2
            'It's just react'
          • 2
            Web development meets Mobile development
          • 1
            Ngon
          CONS OF REACT NATIVE
          • 23
            Javascript
          • 19
            Built by facebook
          • 12
            Cant use CSS
          • 4
            30 FPS Limit
          • 2
            Slow
          • 2
            Generate large apk even for a simple app
          • 2
            Some compenents not truly native

          related React Native posts

          Vaibhav Taunk
          Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 3.6M views

          I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

          See more

          I'm working as one of the engineering leads in RunaHR. As our platform is a Saas, we thought It'd be good to have an API (We chose Ruby and Rails for this) and a SPA (built with React and Redux ) connected. We started the SPA with Create React App since It's pretty easy to start.

          We use Jest as the testing framework and react-testing-library to test React components. In Rails we make tests using RSpec.

          Our main database is PostgreSQL, but we also use MongoDB to store some type of data. We started to use Redis  for cache and other time sensitive operations.

          We have a couple of extra projects: One is an Employee app built with React Native and the other is an internal back office dashboard built with Next.js for the client and Python in the backend side.

          Since we have different frontend apps we have found useful to have Bit to document visual components and utils in JavaScript.

          See more
          Flutter logo

          Flutter

          16.2K
          15.8K
          1.2K
          Cross-platform mobile framework from Google
          16.2K
          15.8K
          + 1
          1.2K
          PROS OF FLUTTER
          • 141
            Hot Reload
          • 120
            Cross platform
          • 104
            Performance
          • 89
            Backed by Google
          • 73
            Compiled into Native Code
          • 59
            Fast Development
          • 58
            Open Source
          • 53
            Fast Prototyping
          • 49
            Single Codebase
          • 48
            Expressive and Flexible UI
          • 36
            Reactive Programming
          • 34
            Material Design
          • 30
            Dart
          • 29
            Widget-based
          • 26
            Target to Fuchsia
          • 20
            IOS + Android
          • 17
            Easy to learn
          • 16
            Great CLI Support
          • 14
            You can use it as mobile, web, Server development
          • 14
            Tooling
          • 13
            Debugging quickly
          • 13
            Have built-in Material theme
          • 12
            Good docs & sample code
          • 12
            Target to Android
          • 12
            Community
          • 11
            Support by multiple IDE: Android Studio, VS Code, XCode
          • 10
            Easy Testing Support
          • 10
            Written by Dart, which is easy to read code
          • 9
            Real platform free framework of the future
          • 9
            Have built-in Cupertino theme
          • 9
            Target to iOS
          • 8
            Easy to Unit Test
          • 8
            Easy to Widget Test
          • 1
            Large Community
          CONS OF FLUTTER
          • 29
            Need to learn Dart
          • 10
            Lack of community support
          • 10
            No 3D Graphics Engine Support
          • 8
            Graphics programming
          • 6
            Lack of friendly documentation
          • 2
            Lack of promotion
          • 1
            Https://iphtechnologies.com/difference-between-flutter

          related Flutter posts

          Vaibhav Taunk
          Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 3.6M views

          I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

          See more
          Jose Luis Alvarado Ramirez

          The only two programming languages I know are Python and Dart, I fall in love with Dart when I learned about the type safeness, ease of refactoring, and the help of the IDE. I have an idea for an app, a simple app, but I need SEO and server rendering, and I also want it to be available on all platforms. I can't use Flutter or Dart anymore because of that. I have been searching and looks like there is no way to avoid learning HTML and CSS for this. I want to use Supabase as BASS, at the moment I think that I have two options if I want to learn the least amount of things because of my lack of time available:

          1. Quasar Framework: They claim that I can do all the things I need, but I have to use JavaScript, and I am going to have all those bugs with a type-safe programming language avoidable. I guess I can use TypeScript?, but that means learning both, and I am not sure if I will be able to use 100% Typescript. Besides Vue.js, Node.js, etc.

          2. Blazor and .NET: There is MAUI with razor bindings in .Net now, and also a Blazor server. And as far as I can see, the transition from Dart to C# will be easy. I guess that I have to learn some Javascript here and there, but I have to less things I guess, am I wrong? But Blazor is a new technology, Vue is widely used.

          See more
          Ionic logo

          Ionic

          9.3K
          8.4K
          1.8K
          A beautiful front-end framework for developing cross-platform apps with web technologies like Angular and React.
          9.3K
          8.4K
          + 1
          1.8K
          PROS OF IONIC
          • 248
            Allows for rapid prototyping
          • 228
            Hybrid mobile
          • 208
            It's angularjs
          • 186
            Free
          • 179
            It's javascript, html, and css
          • 109
            Ui and theming
          • 78
            Great designs
          • 74
            Mv* pattern
          • 71
            Reuse frontend devs on mobile
          • 65
            Extensibility
          • 31
            Great community
          • 29
            Open source
          • 23
            Responsive design
          • 21
            Good cli
          • 14
            So easy to use
          • 13
            Angularjs-based
          • 13
            Beautifully designed
          • 12
            Widgets
          • 11
            Allows for rapid prototyping, hybrid mobile
          • 11
            Typescript
          • 10
            Quick prototyping, amazing community
          • 10
            Easy setup
          • 8
            Angular2 support
          • 7
            Fast, easy, free
          • 7
            Because of the productivity and easy for development
          • 7
            Base on angular
          • 7
            So much thought behind what developers actually need
          • 6
            Super fast, their dev team is amazingly passionate
          • 6
            Easy to use
          • 6
            It's Angular
          • 4
            UI is awesome
          • 4
            Hot deploy
          • 3
            Material design support using theme
          • 3
            Amazing support
          • 3
            It's the future
          • 3
            Angular
          • 3
            Allow for rapid prototyping
          • 3
            Easy setup, development and testing
          • 3
            Ionic creator
          • 2
            User Friendly
          • 2
            It's angular js
          • 2
            Complete package
          • 2
            Simple & Fast
          • 2
            Fastest growing mobile app framework
          • 2
            Best Support and Community
          • 2
            Material Design By Default
          • 2
            Cross platform
          • 2
            Documentation
          • 2
            Because I can use my existing web devloper skills
          • 2
            Removes 300ms delay in mobile browsers
          • 1
            Responsive
          • 1
            Native access
          • 1
            Typescript support
          • 1
            Ionic conect codeigniter
          • 1
            Fast Prototyping
          • 1
            All Trending Stack
          CONS OF IONIC
          • 20
            Not suitable for high performance or UI intensive apps
          • 15
            Not meant for game development
          • 2
            Not a native app

          related Ionic posts

          Bhupendra Madhu
          Web Developer at Ecombooks · | 8 upvotes · 519.8K views

          I want to learn cross-platform application frameworks like React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or Ionic, and I'm a web developer. I can learn other programming languages as well. But I'm confused about what to learn, which framework is best, and which framework will last long as the application grows further into complexity.

          See more
          Saber Hosney
          Senior software engineer at Shortcut · | 7 upvotes · 270.5K views

          Greetings!

          I have been searching lately for frameworks to build mobile apps.

          We are trying to make something like a quiz app as a way for customers to contact us. I considered Ionic and React Native because we use JavaScript most of the time in websites, e.g., Vue.js/Nuxt.js. But Flutter seems a decent choice as well, especially since you can use Android/iOS-like components. We are looking for something that works in the long term, something that's time and cost-effective, especially when paired with backend services like Firebase or a GraphQL server. I would like to know your opinions and recommendations. Thank you!

          See more
          Unity logo

          Unity

          1.6K
          1.4K
          73
          Unity brings state-of-the-art, affordable multiplatform tools and services to developers of interactive content everywhere.
          1.6K
          1.4K
          + 1
          73
          PROS OF UNITY
          • 16
            Because it's a powerful engine, you can build anything
          • 14
            C# language
          • 11
            Very Popular
          • 7
            Easy to Use
          • 6
            He Has A Free VErsion
          • 6
            Cross Platform
          • 5
            2nd Game Engine In The World
          • 4
            Good Choise
          • 4
            Very Large Showcase
          CONS OF UNITY
          • 4
            Hard to get started with
          • 4
            Clunky UI
          • 4
            Closed source
          • 3
            No consistency with updates
          • 3
            Requires to build a lot of tools
          • 2
            Gigantic by being 9gb (thats what setup says)

          related Unity posts

          Shared insights
          on
          BabylonJSBabylonJSthree.jsthree.jsUnityUnity

          We already have an existing 3d interactive application for windows, mac, and iOS devices and have planned to move that app to the web for high availability to different types of users. I have been searching for different options for it. Our existing application is made in Unity so we prefer to work on unity webgl but it also has its drawbacks. Other than that we are also thinking to change the tech stack to three.js or BabylonJS due to their high compatibility with the web ecosystem. I want to know which engine/library/framework we should use for the development of our 3d web application. Also with unity webgl, we want to develop all UI parts in web technologies only and will use the unity3d for 3d part only.

          Points that are very important to consider - 1. Memory optimization and allocation 2. Quality 3. Shaders 4. Materials 5. Lighting 6. Mesh editing, mesh creation at runtime 7. Ar 8. Vr 10. Support on different browsers including mobile browsers 11. Physics(gravity, collision, cloth simulation, etc.) 12. Initial load time 13. Speed and performance 14. Max vertices count. What happens when we load models exceeding max vertex count? 15. Development time 16. Learning curve (Unity3d we already working on) 17. Ease of use. What artists can do using any platform eg. in unity3d, artists can edit materials, set up lighting etc? 18. Future scope 19. Scalability 20. Integration with web ecosystem

          See more
          Xamarin logo

          Xamarin

          1.3K
          1.5K
          785
          Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
          1.3K
          1.5K
          + 1
          785
          PROS OF XAMARIN
          • 121
            Power of c# on mobile devices
          • 81
            Native performance
          • 79
            Native apps with native ui controls
          • 73
            No javascript - truely compiled code
          • 67
            Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
          • 45
            Ability to leverage visual studio
          • 44
            Mvvm pattern
          • 44
            Many great c# libraries
          • 36
            Amazing support
          • 34
            Powerful platform for .net developers
          • 19
            GUI Native look and Feel
          • 16
            Nuget package manager
          • 12
            Free
          • 9
            Backed by Microsoft
          • 9
            Enables code reuse on server
          • 8
            Faster Development
          • 7
            Use of third-party .NET libraries
          • 7
            It's free since Apr 2016
          • 7
            Best performance than other cross-platform
          • 7
            Easy Debug and Trace
          • 7
            Open Source
          • 6
            Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
          • 6
            Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
          • 5
            That just work for every scenario
          • 5
            C# mult paradigm language
          • 5
            Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
          • 4
            Great docs
          • 4
            Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
          • 4
            Microsoft stack
          • 4
            Microsoft backed
          • 3
            Well Designed
          • 3
            Small learning curve for Mobile developers
          • 2
            Ionic
          • 2
            Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
          CONS OF XAMARIN
          • 9
            Build times
          • 5
            Visual Studio
          • 4
            Price
          • 3
            Complexity
          • 3
            Scalability
          • 2
            Nuget
          • 2
            Maturity
          • 2
            Build Tools
          • 2
            Support
          • 0
            Maturidade
          • 0
            Performance

          related Xamarin posts

          Greg Neumann
          Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1.4M views

          Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

          This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

          But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

          I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

          Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

          See more
          Bhupendra Madhu
          Web Developer at Ecombooks · | 8 upvotes · 519.8K views

          I want to learn cross-platform application frameworks like React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or Ionic, and I'm a web developer. I can learn other programming languages as well. But I'm confused about what to learn, which framework is best, and which framework will last long as the application grows further into complexity.

          See more