Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ansible vs Git: What are the differences?
Introduction
Ansible and Git are both widely used tools in software development and automation. While they serve different purposes, they do have some key differences.
- Architecture: Ansible is an automation tool that uses a client-server architecture, where the control machine executes tasks on remote target machines. On the other hand, Git is a distributed version control system that does not require a central server and allows developers to work offline and commit changes locally.
- Functionality: Ansible focuses on configuration management and automation of IT infrastructure. It is used to set up and maintain servers, deploy applications, and manage network devices. Git, on the other hand, is primarily used for version control, allowing developers to collaborate, track changes, and manage source code efficiently.
- Ease of Use: Ansible uses a declarative language that is easy to read and understand, making it accessible to non-programmers. It utilizes human-readable YAML files for defining tasks and configurations. In contrast, Git requires some programming knowledge, especially when resolving merge conflicts and working with branches.
- Scope: Ansible is designed to handle a wide range of tasks, from simple one-liner commands to complex multi-machine workflows. It can be used to manage and automate infrastructure at scale. Git, on the other hand, is focused on managing source code and does not have the same level of automation capabilities as Ansible.
- Workflow: Ansible follows a push-based model, where the control machine pushes instructions to the target machines and executes tasks remotely. It ensures the desired configuration state is achieved on the target machines. Git, on the other hand, follows a pull-based model, where developers pull changes from a central repository or clone repositories to their local machines for development.
- Collaboration: Ansible does not provide built-in collaboration features and is primarily used for automation and configuration management tasks. Git, on the other hand, is designed for collaboration and allows multiple developers to work on the same project simultaneously, merging their changes and resolving conflicts as needed.
In Summary, Ansible is an automation tool primarily used for configuration management and infrastructure automation, while Git is a distributed version control system focused on source code management and collaboration among developers.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Ansible
- Agentless284
- Great configuration210
- Simple199
- Powerful176
- Easy to learn155
- Flexible69
- Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done55
- Makes sense35
- Super efficient and flexible30
- Powerful27
- Dynamic Inventory11
- Backed by Red Hat9
- Works with AWS7
- Cloud Oriented6
- Easy to maintain6
- Vagrant provisioner4
- Simple and powerful4
- Multi language4
- Simple4
- Because SSH4
- Procedural or declarative, or both4
- Easy4
- Consistency3
- Well-documented2
- Masterless2
- Debugging is simple2
- Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera2
- Fast as hell2
- Manage any OS1
- Work on windows, but difficult to manage1
- Certified Content1
Pros of Git
- Distributed version control system1.4K
- Efficient branching and merging1.1K
- Fast959
- Open source845
- Better than svn726
- Great command-line application368
- Simple306
- Free291
- Easy to use232
- Does not require server222
- Distributed28
- Small & Fast23
- Feature based workflow18
- Staging Area15
- Most wide-spread VSC13
- Disposable Experimentation11
- Role-based codelines11
- Frictionless Context Switching7
- Data Assurance6
- Efficient5
- Just awesome4
- Easy branching and merging3
- Github integration3
- Compatible2
- Possible to lose history and commits2
- Flexible2
- Team Integration1
- Easy1
- Light1
- Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system1
- Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing1
- Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast1
- CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome1
- It's what you do1
- Phinx0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ansible
- Dangerous8
- Hard to install5
- Doesn't Run on Windows3
- Bloated3
- Backward compatibility3
- No immutable infrastructure2
Cons of Git
- Hard to learn16
- Inconsistent command line interface11
- Easy to lose uncommitted work9
- Worst documentation ever possibly made8
- Awful merge handling5
- Unexistent preventive security flows3
- Rebase hell3
- Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly2
- When --force is disabled, cannot rebase2
- Doesn't scale for big data1