StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Apache Hive vs Apache Spark

Apache Hive vs Apache Spark

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Stacks487
Followers475
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.9K
Forks4.8K
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
Stacks3.1K
Followers3.5K
Votes140
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks28.9K

Apache Hive vs Apache Spark: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Apache Hive and Apache Spark, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Data Processing: Apache Hive is a data warehouse infrastructure built on top of Hadoop for querying and analyzing large datasets stored in distributed storage, using a SQL-like language called HiveQL. On the other hand, Apache Spark is a general-purpose cluster computing system that provides in-memory processing capabilities, supporting various programming languages for data processing and performing tasks like batch processing, real-time streaming, and machine learning.

  2. Processing Speed: While Apache Hive runs on top of Hadoop MapReduce, which is known for its slow processing speed due to disk-based data processing, Apache Spark utilizes in-memory processing, resulting in significantly faster data processing. This difference in processing speed makes Apache Spark more suitable for real-time and interactive analysis.

  3. Ease of Use: Apache Hive focuses on providing a user-friendly abstraction layer for data analysts familiar with SQL, making it easier to process and analyze large datasets using existing SQL knowledge. Apache Spark, on the other hand, requires a deeper understanding of programming concepts and offers greater flexibility for developers to design their data processing pipelines using various APIs and programming languages like Scala, Java, Python, and R.

  4. Iterative Processing: Apache Spark provides support for iterative processing, which is essential for machine learning algorithms and graph analytics. This capability enables Spark to cache data in memory and reuse it across multiple iterations, resulting in faster performance for iterative workloads. Apache Hive, being a batch processing framework, lacks this ability for efficient iterative processing.

  5. Real-time Streaming: While Apache Spark comes with built-in support for real-time streaming data processing through its streaming API, Apache Hive is primarily designed for batch processing and lacks native support for real-time streaming. Apache Hive can still be used for real-time analysis by integrating with other tools like Apache Kafka or Apache Storm.

  6. Community Ecosystem: Apache Spark has gained significant popularity in recent years and has a vibrant and active community contributing various libraries, tools, and frameworks around it. This makes it easier for developers to find support, documentation, and reusable components for their data processing needs. Although Apache Hive also has a strong community, it may not match the extensive ecosystem surrounding Apache Spark.

In summary, Apache Hive is a SQL-based data warehouse infrastructure for batch processing and querying large datasets, whereas Apache Spark is a general-purpose cluster computing system with in-memory processing capabilities, supporting real-time and iterative processing, and offering a more diverse programming model. Apache Spark outperforms Apache Hive in terms of speed, flexibility, and real-time analysis capabilities, while Apache Hive excels in its user-friendly SQL interface and compatibility with existing SQL knowledge.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Hive, Apache Spark

Ashish
Ashish

Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest

Nov 27, 2019

Needs adviceonApache HiveApache HivePrestoPrestoAmazon EC2Amazon EC2

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we’ve worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest’s scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

3.72M views3.72M
Comments
Nilesh
Nilesh

Technical Architect at Self Employed

Jul 8, 2020

Needs adviceonElasticsearchElasticsearchKafkaKafka

We have a Kafka topic having events of type A and type B. We need to perform an inner join on both type of events using some common field (primary-key). The joined events to be inserted in Elasticsearch.

In usual cases, type A and type B events (with same key) observed to be close upto 15 minutes. But in some cases they may be far from each other, lets say 6 hours. Sometimes event of either of the types never come.

In all cases, we should be able to find joined events instantly after they are joined and not-joined events within 15 minutes.

576k views576k
Comments
Karthik
Karthik

CPO at Cantiz

Nov 5, 2019

Decided

The platform deals with time series data from sensors aggregated against things( event data that originates at periodic intervals). We use Cassandra as our distributed database to store time series data. Aggregated data insights from Cassandra is delivered as web API for consumption from other applications. Presto as a distributed sql querying engine, can provide a faster execution time provided the queries are tuned for proper distribution across the cluster. Another objective that we had was to combine Cassandra table data with other business data from RDBMS or other big data systems where presto through its connector architecture would have opened up a whole lot of options for us.

225k views225k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

Hive facilitates reading, writing, and managing large datasets residing in distributed storage using SQL. Structure can be projected onto data already in storage.

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Built on top of Apache Hadoop; Tools to enable easy access to data via SQL; Support for extract/transform/load (ETL), reporting, and data analysis; Access to files stored either directly in Apache HDFS and HBase; Query execution using Apache Hadoop MapReduce, Tez or Spark frameworks
Run programs up to 100x faster than Hadoop MapReduce in memory, or 10x faster on disk;Write applications quickly in Java, Scala or Python;Combine SQL, streaming, and complex analytics;Spark runs on Hadoop, Mesos, standalone, or in the cloud. It can access diverse data sources including HDFS, Cassandra, HBase, S3
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.9K
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
28.9K
Stacks
487
Stacks
3.1K
Followers
475
Followers
3.5K
Votes
0
Votes
140
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 61
    Open-source
  • 48
    Fast and Flexible
  • 8
    One platform for every big data problem
  • 8
    Great for distributed SQL like applications
  • 6
    Easy to install and to use
Cons
  • 4
    Speed
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
HBase
HBase
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Hive, Apache Spark?

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

lakeFS

lakeFS

It is an open-source data version control system for data lakes. It provides a “Git for data” platform enabling you to implement best practices from software engineering on your data lake, including branching and merging, CI/CD, and production-like dev/test environments.

Druid

Druid

Druid is a distributed, column-oriented, real-time analytics data store that is commonly used to power exploratory dashboards in multi-tenant environments. Druid excels as a data warehousing solution for fast aggregate queries on petabyte sized data sets. Druid supports a variety of flexible filters, exact calculations, approximate algorithms, and other useful calculations.

Apache Kylin

Apache Kylin

Apache Kylin™ is an open source Distributed Analytics Engine designed to provide SQL interface and multi-dimensional analysis (OLAP) on Hadoop/Spark supporting extremely large datasets, originally contributed from eBay Inc.

Splunk

Splunk

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

Apache Impala

Apache Impala

Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.

Vertica

Vertica

It provides a best-in-class, unified analytics platform that will forever be independent from underlying infrastructure.

Azure Synapse

Azure Synapse

It is an analytics service that brings together enterprise data warehousing and Big Data analytics. It gives you the freedom to query data on your terms, using either serverless on-demand or provisioned resources—at scale. It brings these two worlds together with a unified experience to ingest, prepare, manage, and serve data for immediate BI and machine learning needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase