Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AppDynamics

310
628
+ 1
68
Honeycomb

75
110
+ 1
7
Add tool

AppDynamics vs Honeycomb: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this section, we will discuss the key differences between AppDynamics and Honeycomb, two popular observability tools used in software development and monitoring.

  1. Data Collection Approach: One key difference between AppDynamics and Honeycomb lies in their data collection approach. AppDynamics primarily uses an agent-based approach, where lightweight agents are installed on the application servers to collect performance data. On the other hand, Honeycomb follows a more declarative approach, where developers instrument their code using Honeycomb SDKs or libraries to send custom events and context-rich data, allowing for more granular and flexible observability.

  2. Granularity of Data: Another notable difference is the granularity of the data collected by AppDynamics and Honeycomb. AppDynamics focuses more on high-level metrics and aggregates, providing insights into overall application performance. In contrast, Honeycomb excels in providing detailed, event-based data by capturing individual requests and transactions with the ability to query and visualize raw events. This fine-grained approach allows for better troubleshooting and root cause analysis.

  3. Querying and Analysis Capabilities: AppDynamics and Honeycomb also differ in their querying and analysis capabilities. AppDynamics offers a built-in analytics engine that provides predefined metrics, dashboards, and charts. It provides a comprehensive set of out-of-the-box features suitable for monitoring and managing specific use cases. Honeycomb, on the other hand, focuses on query-driven exploration, where users can perform ad-hoc queries using Honeycomb Query Language (HQL) to gain deeper insights into their data. It enables users to dynamically explore and slice the data to uncover hidden patterns and trends.

  4. Cost Model: AppDynamics and Honeycomb employ different cost models for their services. AppDynamics is a commercially licensed tool with pricing based on various factors such as the number of agents, deployment size, and additional features. Honeycomb, on the other hand, offers a consumption-based pricing model, where users are charged based on the volume of ingested data and the duration of data retention. This makes it more flexible for organizations with varying levels of data volume and budget considerations.

  5. Integration Ecosystem: AppDynamics and Honeycomb also differ in terms of their integration ecosystem. AppDynamics provides extensive integrations with various popular tools and platforms, making it easier to fit into existing monitoring and DevOps workflows. Honeycomb, while offering integrations with popular observability tools, distinguishes itself with its focus on providing open APIs and SDKs, enabling users to build custom integrations and extend the platform's capabilities to suit their specific needs.

  6. Maturity and Market Presence: Lastly, AppDynamics and Honeycomb differ in terms of their maturity and market presence. AppDynamics is a well-established player in the application performance monitoring space, with a large customer base and a long track record of providing enterprise-level solutions. Honeycomb, although relatively newer, has gained popularity among developers and DevOps teams due to its unique approach to observability, attracting a vibrant community and focusing on the needs of modern software development practices.

In summary, AppDynamics and Honeycomb differ in their data collection approach, granularity of data, querying and analysis capabilities, cost model, integration ecosystem, as well as their maturity and market presence. These differences make each tool suitable for specific use cases and organizations, depending on their requirements and priorities.

Advice on AppDynamics and Honeycomb
Farzeem Diamond Jiwani
Software Engineer at IVP · | 8 upvotes · 1.5M views
Needs advice
on
AppDynamicsAppDynamicsDatadogDatadog
and
DynatraceDynatrace

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

See more
Needs advice
on
AppDynamicsAppDynamicsDynatraceDynatrace
and
Site24x7Site24x7

Hi Folks,

I am trying to evaluate Site24x7 against AppDynamics, Dynatrace, and New Relic. Has anyone used Site24X7? If so, what are your opinions on the tool? I know that the license costs are very low compared to other tools in the market. Other than that, are there any major issues anyone has encountered using the tool itself?

See more
Replies (1)
Lucas Rincon
Recommends
on
InstanaInstana

what are the most important things you are looking for the tools to do? each has their strong points... are you looking to monitor new tech like containers, k8s, and microservices?

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of AppDynamics
Pros of Honeycomb
  • 21
    Deep code visibility
  • 13
    Powerful
  • 8
    Real-Time Visibility
  • 7
    Great visualization
  • 6
    Easy Setup
  • 6
    Comprehensive Coverage of Programming Languages
  • 4
    Deep DB Troubleshooting
  • 3
    Excellent Customer Support
  • 2
    Powerful UI
  • 2
    High-Cardinality Data
  • 2
    BubbleUp + Heat maps
  • 1
    Better Value

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AppDynamics
Cons of Honeycomb
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 2
    Poor to non-existent integration with aws services
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    21
    81
    191
    844
    9

    What is AppDynamics?

    AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

    What is Honeycomb?

    We built Honeycomb to answer the hard questions that come up when you're trying to operate your software–to debug microservices, serverless, distributed systems, polyglot persistence, containers, and a world of fast, parallel deploys.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use AppDynamics?
    What companies use Honeycomb?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with AppDynamics?
    What tools integrate with Honeycomb?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to AppDynamics and Honeycomb?
    Datadog
    Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!
    New Relic
    The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.
    Nagios
    Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.
    Splunk
    It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.
    ELK
    It is the acronym for three open source projects: Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. Elasticsearch is a search and analytics engine. Logstash is a server‑side data processing pipeline that ingests data from multiple sources simultaneously, transforms it, and then sends it to a "stash" like Elasticsearch. Kibana lets users visualize data with charts and graphs in Elasticsearch.
    See all alternatives