StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs CircleCI

Bamboo vs CircleCI

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CircleCI
CircleCI
Stacks14.5K
Followers7.1K
Votes974
Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17

Bamboo vs CircleCI: What are the differences?

Introduction: Bamboo and CircleCI are continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) tools, both aimed at automating and streamlining the software development process. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Market Positioning: Bamboo is a product of Atlassian, a well-known company in the software development industry. It is often chosen by enterprises or larger organizations due to its robust features and scalability. On the other hand, CircleCI is a cloud-based platform that caters to a broader range of customers, including smaller teams and individual developers.

  2. Hosting Options: Bamboo can be self-hosted on-premises or used as a cloud-based service provided by Atlassian. This flexibility allows organizations to choose the deployment option that best suits their needs and infrastructure. In contrast, CircleCI solely operates as a cloud-based platform, which eliminates the need for self-hosting or managing any infrastructure.

  3. Ease of Use: Bamboo is known for its user-friendly interface and ease of setup. It provides a visually appealing, intuitive web-based interface, making it accessible even for users with less technical expertise. CircleCI also offers a straightforward setup process, but its configuration is primarily code-based, making it more suitable for developers who prefer working with code and have a good understanding of CI/CD concepts.

  4. Integration Ecosystem: Bamboo is designed to work seamlessly with other Atlassian tools, such as Jira, Bitbucket, and Confluence. This tight integration allows for better collaboration and synchronization between different stages of the software development lifecycle. CircleCI, on the other hand, offers a wide range of third-party integrations with popular tools like GitHub, Slack, and AWS, providing flexibility and options for users.

  5. Pricing Model: Bamboo follows a server-based pricing model, where the cost is based on the number of build agents and nodes needed to run builds and deployments. This can make it more expensive, especially for larger teams or organizations requiring more resources. In contrast, CircleCI offers a consumption-based pricing model, which charges based on the number of containers used, making it more cost-effective, especially for smaller teams or projects with varying demands.

  6. Community Support: Bamboo has a well-established user community and a large knowledge base available through Atlassian's resources. This enables users to find extensive documentation, tutorials, and access to community forums for help and support. CircleCI also has an active community and provides various resources, but its community support might not be as extensive as Bamboo due to the difference in user base and market positioning.

In summary, Bamboo is a feature-rich CI/CD tool with a strong focus on enterprise use, providing flexibility in hosting options, tight integration with Atlassian tools, and an intuitive interface. CircleCI, on the other hand, caters to a broader range of users, offering a cloud-based infrastructure, code-based configuration, extensive third-party integrations, cost-effective pricing, and a developer-friendly ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CircleCI, Bamboo

Somnath
Somnath

Engineering Leader at Altimetrik Corp.

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonCircleCICircleCIDrone.ioDrone.ioGitHub ActionsGitHub Actions

I am in the process of evaluating CircleCI, Drone.io, and GitHub Actions to cover my #CI/ #CD needs. I would appreciate your advice on comparative study w.r.t. attributes like language-Inclusive support, code-base integration, performance, cost, maintenance, support, ease of use, ability to deal with big projects, etc. based on actual industry experience.

Thanks in advance!

1.82M views1.82M
Comments
Phillip
Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

The introduction of Orbs a few years ago has really streamlined CircleCI configuration files and made them really easy to work with. Haven't tried GitHub Actions and decided to go with what was familiar instead of trying something new. Tried to make AWS Codepipeline work a few years back on different projects and found it to be incredibly frustrating, lacking support for some of the most basic features and use cases.

41.1k views41.1k
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CircleCI
CircleCI
Bamboo
Bamboo

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

Language-Inclusive Support;Custom Environments;Flexible Resource Allocation;SSH Or Local Builds For Easy Debugging;Improved Caching;Unmatched Security;Parallelism;Insights
-
Statistics
Stacks
14.5K
Stacks
504
Followers
7.1K
Followers
549
Votes
974
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 226
    Github integration
  • 177
    Easy setup
  • 153
    Fast builds
  • 94
    Competitively priced
  • 74
    Slack integration
Cons
  • 12
    Unstable
  • 6
    Scammy pricing structure
  • 0
    Aggressive Github permissions
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Low community support
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
Integrations
dotCloud
dotCloud
GitHub
GitHub
Xcode
Xcode
Azure Container Service
Azure Container Service
Slack
Slack
Heroku
Heroku
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat

What are some alternatives to CircleCI, Bamboo?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana