Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Basecamp vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?
Difference between Basecamp and Microsoft Teams
- Pricing and Payment Plans: Basecamp offers a simple pricing structure with a fixed monthly fee, regardless of the number of users or projects. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams is bundled with Microsoft 365 subscription plans, which means it requires a separate payment for accessing additional features. Basecamp's pricing model provides more transparency and flexibility for businesses.
- Project Management Features: Basecamp focuses on providing a streamlined project management experience with features like to-do lists, message boards, and file sharing. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, offers a more extensive set of collaboration tools, including chat, video conferencing, and integration with other Microsoft applications like Word and Excel. While both platforms offer project management capabilities, Microsoft Teams provides a broader range of features.
- Integrations and Ecosystem: Microsoft Teams benefits from its integration with the wider suite of Microsoft productivity tools and services, such as SharePoint, OneDrive, and Outlook. This integration allows for a seamless workflow and easy access to files and documents. Basecamp, on the other hand, does not have such an extensive ecosystem and primarily focuses on providing a robust project management solution.
- User Interface and User Experience: Basecamp has a straightforward and minimalistic user interface, which makes it easy to navigate and use for both individuals and teams. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, has a more complex interface due to its wide range of features. While this complexity allows for more functionality, it can also lead to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Mobile Applications: Both Basecamp and Microsoft Teams offer mobile applications for iOS and Android devices. However, Microsoft Teams provides a more comprehensive mobile experience with additional features like screen sharing and video meetings. Basecamp's mobile app focuses more on core project management functions, providing a simplified experience for users on the go.
- Security and Compliance: Microsoft Teams offers enterprise-level security features such as data encryption, multi-factor authentication, and compliance with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA. Basecamp also prioritizes security but may not have the same level of enterprise-grade security features as Microsoft Teams. Businesses with specific security and compliance requirements may prefer Microsoft Teams for their collaboration needs.
In Summary, Basecamp provides a simple and focused project management experience with fixed pricing, while Microsoft Teams offers a broader range of collaboration tools, integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, and enhanced mobile capabilities. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of the business.
A rapidly growing start-up in the biotech field. Main requirements not limited to, but include - cloud sharing, interacting through comments and messages, being able to specify deadlines, estimated time interval, time-lapsed/remaining, assign multiple tasks (task dependencies), and label their priority level, and have integration with a nice group of tools/apps (google and so on).
Basecamp is a great product for remote teams. It is a mindset. If you're looking for a standard project management tool with lots of features, ClickUp is a great choice. It's a bit slow (especially mobile), but in terms of features, it's unbeatable.
A good collaboration tool was always a big challene in the most team I've met. The main challenge is there are many tools with tons of features. They'r all great in the paper. But in practice, the team usually doesn't enjoy collaborating using them. This is the challenging part. The project management tools should be well designed to keep simplicity in combination with well-chosen features to bring the most productivity and activity among the team. I'm thinking about many of my stacks, ClickUp is one of the few choices which I've never thought about migrating about. I can't describe it in text, I just advise you to try it once and you'll understand. The team behind ClickUp is really active. They really care about delivering new features.
You are describing something close to issue tracker like redmine, jira+confluence, youtrack and etc. Redmine is absolutely free, for jira you should pay, youtrack has different licenses.
I have been using this for a while and recommended to my last 15 clients who were amazed by the flexibility of the platform. It has everything You need!
As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.
Communication We have chosen two tools for our team communication.
- Slack
We choose Slack since all of us are familiar with this communication tool. We have a private channel for our team Sphinx for text messages. We added Github apps inside our private channel for repo update notifications. Furthermore, we could contact the subject matter experts within the workspace DCSIL directly for the issues we meet.
- Microsoft Teams
We use Microsoft Teams for virtual meetings for its fast connection speed. In addition, the call feature in Slack is a paid feature, and we could have virtual meetings and share screens for free in Microsoft Teams.
we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.
on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.
we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.
Pros of Basecamp
- Team collaboration (non-tech)71
- It's simple and intuitive39
- Great UI24
- Plain, simple20
- Very fast15
- Clear pricing12
- Super fast task creation9
- Integration with external services7
- iPhone app4
- Frequent + awesome updates4
- Remote management1
- As close to an all-in-one tool that is client friendly1
- Team collaboration1
- Team and client collaboration1
- Plays nice with Google Apps1
Pros of Microsoft Teams
- Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow28
- Mobile friendly24
- Free19
- Great integrations12
- Well-thought Design12
- Channels10
- Easy setup8
- Unlimited users6
- Strong search and data archiving5
- Easy to integrate with5
- Multi domain switching support4
- Web interface3
- Same interface on multiple platforms3
- Great voice quality2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Basecamp
- Basic3
Cons of Microsoft Teams
- Confusing UI17
- Bad performance on init and after quite a use12
- Bad Usermanagement10
- No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)6
- Can't see all members in a video meeting6
- Unable to Mute users5
- No Markdown Support5
- You don't really own your messages4
- MIssing public channels4
- Forced WYSIWYG4
- Stubborn, unused friendly3
- Challenging Onboarding3
- No linux support3
- Audio support problems1
