StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Gitbook

GitHub vs Gitbook

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Gitbook
Gitbook
Stacks219
Followers352
Votes10

GitHub vs Gitbook: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between GitHub and Gitbook, highlighting key differences between the two platforms.

  1. User Interface and Functionality: GitHub is primarily a code hosting platform that provides version control functionality through Git. It allows users to collaborate and contribute to projects, manage issues, and merge code changes through pull requests. On the other hand, Gitbook is a documentation platform that focuses on creating and publishing technical documentation. It offers features like versioning, collaboration, and powerful writing tools, providing an intuitive interface for managing content.

  2. Target Audience and Purpose: GitHub is widely used by developers and software teams to host and manage code repositories. It is popular for open-source projects and collaboration among developers. Gitbook, on the other hand, targets authors and technical writers who want to create and publish professional documentation. It enables individuals and organizations to create comprehensive books, guides, and documentation resources.

  3. Integration and Ecosystem: GitHub has a vast ecosystem with a wide range of integrations and services. It integrates seamlessly with various development tools and services, such as CI/CD platforms, issue trackers, and code review tools. Gitbook, although it offers some integrations, has a more focused ecosystem that caters specifically to the needs of documentation authors. It integrates with services like Google Analytics, Slack, and content management systems.

  4. Content Structure and Flexibility: GitHub organizes code repositories in a hierarchical structure with directories and files. While it provides flexibility in managing code, it may not be as suitable for organizing lengthy documentation with multiple chapters and sections. Gitbook, however, allows authors to easily create structured content with a hierarchical table of contents, supporting the creation of books and guides with chapters, sections, and pages.

  5. Publication and Distribution: GitHub serves as a code hosting platform, enabling users to publish their code repositories for others to access and contribute to. It provides version control and collaboration features to facilitate the development process. Gitbook, on the other hand, focuses on publishing documentation resources by providing various formats for distribution. It allows authors to generate PDF, eBook, and web versions of their content, making it accessible to a wider audience.

  6. Community and Support: GitHub has a large and active developer community that contributes to open-source projects, shares code, and provides support through discussions and issue tracking. Gitbook, while it does not have the same level of community engagement, has its support forums and resources to assist authors in creating and publishing documentation effectively.

In summary, GitHub is a code hosting platform targeting developers and software teams, providing version control functionalities and collaboration features. Gitbook, on the other hand, is a documentation platform focused on creating and publishing technical documentation, offering an intuitive interface and tools specifically tailored for authors and technical writers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Gitbook

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Gitbook
Gitbook

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
-
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
219
Followers
259.0K
Followers
352
Votes
10.4K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 6
    Prueba
  • 4
    Integrated high-quality editor
Cons
  • 1
    No longer Git or Open
  • 1
    Just sync with GitHub
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Gitbook?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Swagger UI

Swagger UI

Swagger UI is a dependency-free collection of HTML, Javascript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation and sandbox from a Swagger-compliant API

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Apiary

Apiary

It takes more than a simple HTML page to thrill your API users. The right tools take weeks of development. Weeks that apiary.io saves.

ReadMe.io

ReadMe.io

It is an easy-to-use tool to help you build out documentation! Each documentation site that you publish is a project where there is space for documentation, interactive API reference guides, a changelog, and much more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp