AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub Enterprise: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit and GitHub Enterprise are popular version control platforms that offer similar functionalities but have key differences.

1. Code Hosting: AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed, secure, and scalable version control service, while GitHub Enterprise is an on-premises version control solution. CodeCommit is offered as a service in the AWS cloud, making it easily accessible and eliminating the need for infrastructure setup and maintenance. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, requires installation and configuration on local servers.

2. Integration with Other AWS Services: CodeCommit seamlessly integrates with other Amazon Web Services (AWS) services, such as AWS CodeBuild, AWS CodeDeploy, and AWS CodePipeline, providing a complete DevOps solution. It allows for automated deployments and continuous integration workflows within the AWS ecosystem. GitHub Enterprise does not have the same level of integration with AWS services.

3. Pricing Model: AWS CodeCommit follows the pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the storage, number of repositories, and data transfer. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, has a fixed pricing structure that requires a subscription for a specified number of users. This difference in pricing models allows for more flexibility with CodeCommit and can be cost-effective for smaller teams.

4. Access Control: CodeCommit offers fine-grained access control through AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policies, allowing users to manage permissions at a granular level. GitHub Enterprise also provides access control but is primarily based on user roles and teams. CodeCommit's IAM-based access control provides more flexibility and control over repository access.

5. Scalability and Performance: AWS CodeCommit is built on AWS infrastructure, which ensures scalability and high-performance capabilities. It can handle large code repositories and supports scalability to accommodate growing teams and projects. GitHub Enterprise's scalability and performance may be limited by the capacity of the local servers where it is installed.

6. Backup and Disaster Recovery: AWS CodeCommit automatically replicates repositories across multiple Availability Zones, providing redundancy and ensuring data availability in the event of a failure. It also allows for easy backup and restoration of repositories. GitHub Enterprise requires manual replication and backup processes to ensure data availability and disaster recovery.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit offers a fully managed cloud-based version control service with seamless integration with AWS services, flexible pricing, fine-grained access control, scalability, and automatic backup and restoration capabilities. GitHub Enterprise, on the other hand, provides an on-premises version control solution with a fixed pricing structure, role-based access control, and limited scalability and disaster recovery options.