GitLab vs Jenkins X

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Jenkins X

Stacks147

Followers370

Votes16

GitHub Stars4.7K

Forks800

GitLab vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and Jenkins X are both version control and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

Development Focus: GitLab has a broader focus on the software development lifecycle, providing not only version control and CI/CD capabilities but also project management, issue tracking, and code review features. Jenkins X, on the other hand, is specifically designed for cloud-native applications and Kubernetes-based environments, focusing more on CI/CD workflows.
Built-in CI/CD Pipelines: GitLab offers built-in CI/CD pipelines as part of its core features, allowing developers to define and automate their CI/CD workflows within the same platform. Jenkins X, on the other hand, works seamlessly with Jenkins to provide powerful CI/CD capabilities but requires additional setup and configuration.
Git Workflow: GitLab follows a code-centric workflow, where developers push code changes to a central repository, triggering CI/CD pipelines. Jenkins X, however, follows a "GitOps" workflow, where changes to the application and infrastructure are made by modifying the Git repository, and Jenkins X automatically synchronizes those changes to the deployed environment.
Kubernetes Native: Jenkins X is specifically designed for cloud-native and Kubernetes-based environments, providing native integration with Kubernetes and facilitating the deployment of microservices and containerized applications. GitLab, while also capable of deploying to Kubernetes, does not have the same level of deep integration as Jenkins X.
Opinionated vs. Customizable: Jenkins X takes an opinionated approach, providing a predefined set of best practices and default configurations for CI/CD workflows in cloud-native environments. GitLab, on the other hand, offers more customization options, allowing developers to define their own CI/CD pipelines and workflows according to their specific requirements.
Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a larger and more diverse community, with a wide range of third-party integrations, plugins, and extensions available. Jenkins X, being a more specialized tool, has a smaller community but is backed by the larger Jenkins ecosystem, which provides a rich set of plugins and extensions for CI/CD automation.

In summary, GitLab is a comprehensive platform for software development with built-in CI/CD capabilities, while Jenkins X is a specialized tool designed for cloud-native applications and Kubernetes-based environments, focusing on GitOps workflows and deep Kubernetes integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Jenkins X

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Jenkins X
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars 4.7K
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks 800
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 147
Followers 54.5K	Followers 370
Votes 2.5K	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 7 Kubernetes integration 5 Scripted Pipelines 4 GitOps Cons 1 Complexity
Integrations
No integrations available	Kubernetes macOS Linux Mint Ubuntu Debian Fedora

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Jenkins X?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Related Comparisons

GitLab vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitLab and Jenkins X are both version control and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools. While they serve similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

Development Focus: GitLab has a broader focus on the software development lifecycle, providing not only version control and CI/CD capabilities but also project management, issue tracking, and code review features. Jenkins X, on the other hand, is specifically designed for cloud-native applications and Kubernetes-based environments, focusing more on CI/CD workflows.
Built-in CI/CD Pipelines: GitLab offers built-in CI/CD pipelines as part of its core features, allowing developers to define and automate their CI/CD workflows within the same platform. Jenkins X, on the other hand, works seamlessly with Jenkins to provide powerful CI/CD capabilities but requires additional setup and configuration.
Git Workflow: GitLab follows a code-centric workflow, where developers push code changes to a central repository, triggering CI/CD pipelines. Jenkins X, however, follows a "GitOps" workflow, where changes to the application and infrastructure are made by modifying the Git repository, and Jenkins X automatically synchronizes those changes to the deployed environment.
Kubernetes Native: Jenkins X is specifically designed for cloud-native and Kubernetes-based environments, providing native integration with Kubernetes and facilitating the deployment of microservices and containerized applications. GitLab, while also capable of deploying to Kubernetes, does not have the same level of deep integration as Jenkins X.
Opinionated vs. Customizable: Jenkins X takes an opinionated approach, providing a predefined set of best practices and default configurations for CI/CD workflows in cloud-native environments. GitLab, on the other hand, offers more customization options, allowing developers to define their own CI/CD pipelines and workflows according to their specific requirements.
Community and Ecosystem: GitLab has a larger and more diverse community, with a wide range of third-party integrations, plugins, and extensions available. Jenkins X, being a more specialized tool, has a smaller community but is backed by the larger Jenkins ecosystem, which provides a rich set of plugins and extensions for CI/CD automation.

GitLab vs Jenkins X

Overview