StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitLab vs Sonatype Nexus

GitLab vs Sonatype Nexus

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus
Stacks526
Followers370
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks672

GitLab vs Sonatype Nexus: What are the differences?

GitLab and Sonatype Nexus are two widely used DevOps tools that facilitate software development and deployment processes. Let's explore the key difference between them.

  1. Cost: GitLab is an open-source platform, allowing users to access and use its features without any additional cost. On the other hand, Sonatype Nexus is a commercial product that requires users to purchase a license for full access to its functionalities.

  2. Repository Types: GitLab primarily focuses on the management of source code repositories and version control, supporting various programming languages. In contrast, Sonatype Nexus specializes in managing different types of software artifacts, including build artifacts, binaries, and libraries, making it suitable for a wider range of development workflows.

  3. Built-in CI/CD: GitLab provides built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities, allowing developers to automate the testing and deployment process directly from the GitLab interface. Sonatype Nexus, on the other hand, does not offer built-in CI/CD functionalities, requiring users to integrate it with external CI/CD tools.

  4. Security and Vulnerability Scanning: GitLab includes built-in security features, such as static code analysis, dependency scanning, and container scanning, to help identify and address security vulnerabilities within the codebase. Sonatype Nexus focuses on providing comprehensive vulnerability management and threat intelligence for software components and libraries, offering advanced scanning capabilities.

  5. Community and Plugin Ecosystem: GitLab has a vibrant community and a wide range of plugins and integrations available, allowing users to extend its functionalities and customize their workflows. Sonatype Nexus also has a community around it, but its plugin ecosystem is not as extensive as GitLab's, limiting customization options.

  6. User Interface and User Experience: GitLab provides a seamless and user-friendly interface with features like inline commenting, code reviews, and project management tools, enhancing collaboration and productivity. Sonatype Nexus, being a more specialized tool, has a focused interface that may require some learning curve for new users.

In summary, GitLab offers open-source access, focuses on code repository management, provides built-in CI/CD, and has a vibrant plugin ecosystem, while Sonatype Nexus is a commercial product, specializes in artifact management, offers advanced security scanning, and has a more specialized user interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitLab, Sonatype Nexus

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab
GitLab
Sonatype Nexus
Sonatype Nexus

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

It is an open source repository that supports many artifact formats, including Docker, Java™ and npm. With the Nexus tool integration, pipelines in your toolchain can publish and retrieve versioned apps and their dependencies

Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Supports ZIP;System information;Metrices;Logging and Log viewer
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
672
Stacks
63.4K
Stacks
526
Followers
54.5K
Followers
370
Votes
2.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
PHP
PHP
.NET
.NET
Swift
Swift

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Sonatype Nexus?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana