StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Issue Tracking
  5. Jira vs Phabricator

Jira vs Phabricator

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K
Phabricator
Phabricator
Stacks221
Followers323
Votes187

Jira vs Phabricator: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jira and Phabricator are both popular project management tools used by software development teams to track and manage their projects. While they share some similar features, there are distinct differences between the two platforms. Below are the key differences between Jira and Phabricator:

  1. User Interface and Design: Jira has a more modern and intuitive user interface with a cleaner design. It offers a simpler navigation experience, making it easier for users to find and access the necessary features. On the other hand, Phabricator has a more cluttered user interface with a steeper learning curve. It provides more customization options but can sometimes be overwhelming for new users.

  2. Workflow Customization: Jira provides extensive customization options for creating and modifying workflows according to the team's specific requirements. It allows users to define custom fields, issue types, and workflows, making it highly adaptable. In contrast, Phabricator has a less flexible workflow system, limiting the extent of customization available. It follows a predefined workflow structure that might not suit all project management needs.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Jira offers seamless integration with a wide range of third-party tools and services commonly used in software development, such as Confluence, Slack, and Bitbucket. It provides a comprehensive ecosystem that enables teams to create a centralized hub for all their project management activities. Phabricator, while allowing some integrations, has a more limited set of options, making it less suitable for organizations heavily reliant on external tools.

  4. Pricing Model: While Jira offers both cloud-based and self-hosted options, it also has a licensing cost associated with it. The cloud-based version requires a subscription fee based on the number of users, while the self-hosted option requires a one-time payment. Phabricator, on the other hand, is an open-source platform that is free to use, making it more accessible for small teams or organizations on a tight budget.

  5. Code Review Functionality: Phabricator has a built-in robust code review system that allows developers to collaborate and provide feedback on code changes directly through the platform. While Jira does offer some code review functionality, it is more limited in comparison. Jira's code review capabilities are often complemented by integrating with external code review tools such as Bitbucket or Crucible.

  6. Issue Dependency Management: Jira provides more advanced options for managing issue dependencies. It allows users to create relationships between issues, such as blocks, relates to, or is blocked by, providing better visibility and traceability. Phabricator, while supporting issue dependencies, does not offer the same level of granularity and flexibility in managing them.

In Summary, Jira offers a more user-friendly interface with extensive workflow customization, robust integration capabilities, a flexible pricing model, and advanced issue dependency management. On the other hand, Phabricator is an open-source platform with a more cluttered interface, limited workflow customization options, fewer integration capabilities, and a focus on built-in code review functionality.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira, Phabricator

Jakub
Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

DecidedonYouTrackYouTrackJiraJiraJetBrains SpaceJetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira
Jira
Phabricator
Phabricator

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
reviewing code before it hits master; auditing code after it hits master; hosting Git/Hg/SVN repositories; tracking bugs or "features"; counting down to HL3; expounding liberal tomes of text; nit picking pixels with designers; "project" "manage" "ment"; hiding stuff from coworkers; and also other random things, like memes, badges, and tokens.
Statistics
Stacks
62.5K
Stacks
221
Followers
49.5K
Followers
323
Votes
1.2K
Votes
187
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
Pros
  • 33
    Open Source
  • 29
    Code Review
  • 25
    Supports Git/Hg/SVN
  • 18
    Bug Tracking
  • 17
    Audit Source Code
Integrations
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Asana
Asana
CircleCI
CircleCI
Jenkins
Jenkins
SVN (Subversion)
SVN (Subversion)
Git
Git
Mercurial
Mercurial

What are some alternatives to Jira, Phabricator?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana