StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Issue Tracking
  5. Jira vs Workfront

Jira vs Workfront

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K
Workfront
Workfront
Stacks18
Followers18
Votes0

Jira vs Workfront: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Jira and Workfront, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Jira and Workfront is their scalability. Jira is highly scalable and flexible, making it suitable for both small teams and large enterprises. On the other hand, Workfront is primarily designed for larger organizations with complex workflows and extensive project management needs. It offers robust scaling options to accommodate the growing requirements of large-scale projects.

  2. Workflow and Project Management: Jira offers a highly customizable workflow system, allowing users to define their own processes and track work at a granular level. It provides comprehensive project management features, including project planning, issue tracking, and agile boards. Workfront, on the other hand, offers a more structured and standardized approach to project management. It provides pre-built templates, resource allocation, and advanced reporting features, ideal for organizations that prefer a more centralized and standardized project management approach.

  3. Integration Capabilities: Jira is known for its extensive integration capabilities and supports a wide range of third-party tools and plugins. It can easily integrate with popular development and collaboration tools, such as GitHub, Confluence, and Slack, enabling seamless information flow between different systems. Workfront also offers integration options, but its integration ecosystem is relatively narrower compared to Jira. It is primarily focused on integrations with enterprise tools like Salesforce and SharePoint.

  4. Pricing and Licensing: Jira and Workfront have different pricing and licensing models. Jira offers a variety of pricing options, including a free plan for small teams, as well as different tiers based on the number of users and functionality requirements. Workfront, on the other hand, follows a subscription-based pricing model and offers different pricing plans based on organizational size and feature requirements. The pricing structure for both tools can vary significantly depending on specific needs, making it important for organizations to carefully evaluate their requirements.

  5. User Interface and User Experience: Jira and Workfront have distinct user interfaces and user experiences. Jira has a more technical and developer-oriented interface, with a plethora of customizability options. It provides great flexibility for users who prefer a highly configurable tool. Workfront, on the other hand, offers a more user-friendly and visually appealing interface, designed to cater to a wider range of users, including non-technical stakeholders. Its intuitive design facilitates easier adoption and use by individuals with varying levels of technical expertise.

  6. Industry Focus: While both Jira and Workfront are versatile project management tools, they have different industry focuses. Jira is widely utilized in the software development industry and is highly preferred by development teams due to its integration with popular development and collaboration tools. In contrast, Workfront has a broader industry focus and is heavily used in marketing, advertising, and creative industries. It provides specific features tailored to the needs of these industries, such as digital proofing and marketing resource management.

In summary, Jira and Workfront differ in terms of scalability, workflow and project management approach, integration capabilities, pricing and licensing models, user interface and user experience, as well as industry focus. Organizations should carefully evaluate these differences to choose the tool that best fits their specific project management needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jira, Workfront

Jakub
Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

DecidedonYouTrackYouTrackJiraJiraJetBrains SpaceJetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira
Jira
Workfront
Workfront

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

It allows user to manage projects in one place. It helps marketing, IT, & enterprise teams conquer chaos by improving productivity, collaboration, and visibility.

Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
Project and Portfolio Management; Resource Management; Capacity Planning; GANTT Charts; Workflow Automation; Request Management; Approvals; AGILE Project Management; Team Collaboration; Document Management; Social Recognition; Mobile Access; My Work Queue; Outlook Integration; Notifications and Updates; Reports and Dashboards; Time Tracking; Enterprise-Grade Security; Integrations and API; Online Proofing
Statistics
Stacks
62.5K
Stacks
18
Followers
49.5K
Followers
18
Votes
1.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Asana
Asana
Dropbox
Dropbox
Salesforce Commerce Cloud
Salesforce Commerce Cloud
Google Drive
Google Drive
ProofHQ
ProofHQ
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Salesforce Marketing Cloud

What are some alternatives to Jira, Workfront?

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

AWS Step Functions

AWS Step Functions

AWS Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the components of distributed applications and microservices using visual workflows. Building applications from individual components that each perform a discrete function lets you scale and change applications quickly.

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Apache Beam

Apache Beam

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Bugify

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Luigi

Luigi

It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.

ZenTao

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

Unito

Unito

Build and map powerful workflows across tools to save your team time. No coding required. Create rules to define what information flows between each of your tools, in minutes.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope