Jira vs Zephyr

Overview

Jira

Stacks62.5K

Followers49.5K

Votes1.2K

Zephyr

Stacks62

Followers115

Votes1

Jira vs Zephyr: What are the differences?

Introduction

Jira and Zephyr are popular software tools used for project management and test management in the software development industry. While both serve similar purposes, they have distinct differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Jira and Zephyr.

Integration and Compatibility: Jira is a comprehensive project management tool that allows for seamless integration with various other software and tools, enabling teams to manage their projects more efficiently. On the other hand, Zephyr is a plugin specifically designed for Jira, adding test management capabilities to the existing system. This makes Zephyr highly compatible and tailored for Jira users.
Test Management Features: Zephyr specializes in test management and offers extensive features specifically built for this purpose. It provides functionalities such as test case management, test execution tracking, and test reports generation. In contrast, while Jira does offer some basic test management capabilities, it may not have the same level of dedicated features as Zephyr.
User Interface: One significant difference between Jira and Zephyr lies in their user interfaces. Jira has a more general project management interface that covers various aspects of project organization, including issue tracking, agile boards, and workflow management. On the other hand, Zephyr focuses solely on the test management aspect and provides a more streamlined and specialized user interface.
Pricing and Licensing: Jira offers different pricing plans depending on the number of users and the desired features, making it suitable for both small and large organizations. Zephyr, being a plugin for Jira, follows the same pricing structure as Jira and requires a separate subscription. However, there might be some additional costs associated with utilizing Zephyr's advanced features.
Customization and Flexibility: Jira provides a high level of customization and flexibility to adapt to various project requirements. Users can configure workflows, create custom fields, and tailor the system to their specific needs. While Zephyr inherits most of Jira's customizability, it also comes with its own set of predefined fields and configurations specifically designed for test management.
Dashboard and Reporting: Jira offers visually appealing dashboards and comprehensive reporting capabilities that cover various aspects of project management. These reports include burndown charts, velocity charts, and agile project reports. Zephyr, with its focus on test management, provides test-specific reports that give insights into test execution, coverage, and defects.

In Summary, Jira is a versatile project management tool that can handle test management to a certain extent. Zephyr, being a plugin for Jira, is a specialized test management tool that offers extensive features specifically for managing software testing processes. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific requirements and needs of the organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jira, Zephyr

Jakub

Node.js Software Engineer at Araclx

Mar 6, 2020

Decidedon

YouTrack

Jira

JetBrains Space

YouTrack feels much more lightweight than Jira and additionally have all of features that Jira have, of course lacks at some analytics features, but it's more powerful at permission management and agile workflow. Additionally YouTrack have awesome integration with other JetBrains products such as incoming JetBrains Space and all other IDEs such as GoLand.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jira	Zephyr
Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.	Manage all aspects of software quality; integrate with JIRA and various test tools, foster collaboration and gain real-time visibility.
Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use	Agile; Automation; DevOps; Analytics
Statistics
Stacks 62.5K	Stacks 62
Followers 49.5K	Followers 115
Votes 1.2K	Votes 1
Pros & Cons
Pros 310 Powerful 254 Flexible 149 Easy separation of projects 113 Run in the cloud 105 Code integration Cons 8 Rather expensive 5 Large memory requirement 2 Slow 1 Cloud or Datacenter only	Pros 1 Good integration with JIra Cons 3 Slow UI 2 Slower performance 2 Lack of debugging insights 2 Doesn’t add much value to non-Jira users 2 Lack of bulk edit operations for test runs
Integrations
Acunote Pivotal Tracker Bugsnag SnapEngage HipChat New Relic Zendesk Zopim UserVoice Balsamiq	Trello Bamboo Confluence Zapier

What are some alternatives to Jira, Zephyr?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

Bugify

Bugify offers a simple way of managing issues for your projects.

ZenTao

You can effortlessly stay on top of your product development, create and delegate tasks, test your software, customize, store and secure your documents and more.

Bugzilla

Bugzilla is a "Defect Tracking System" or "Bug-Tracking System". Defect Tracking Systems allow individual or groups of developers to keep track of outstanding bugs in their product effectively. Most commercial defect-tracking software vendors charge enormous licensing fees. Despite being "free", Bugzilla has many features its expensive counterparts lack.

VersionOne

It is a formidable Agile management solution that is both comprehensive and versatile and developed for teams and projects of various scope and size. It is a compact platform that delivers outstanding performance in terms of managing and tracking multiple teams, tasks, and projects.

Mantis

It is a free web-based bug tracking system. It provides a delicate balance between simplicity and power. Users are able to get started in minutes and start managing their projects while collaborating with their teammates and clients effectively.

YouTrack

A project management tool that can be adapted to your processes to help you deliver great products. Track tasks and bugs, plan sprints and releases, create workflows, and customize for your business processes.

SentinelQA

CI failures are painful to debug. SentinelQA gives you run summaries, flaky test detection, regression analysis, visual diffs and AI-generated action items.

AgileTest: Test Management For Jira

AgileTest is a test management tool for Jira, providing full-featured requirements, defects & test management, Ad-hoc test & QA Checklist.

Related Comparisons

Jira vs Zephyr: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration and Compatibility: Jira is a comprehensive project management tool that allows for seamless integration with various other software and tools, enabling teams to manage their projects more efficiently. On the other hand, Zephyr is a plugin specifically designed for Jira, adding test management capabilities to the existing system. This makes Zephyr highly compatible and tailored for Jira users.
Test Management Features: Zephyr specializes in test management and offers extensive features specifically built for this purpose. It provides functionalities such as test case management, test execution tracking, and test reports generation. In contrast, while Jira does offer some basic test management capabilities, it may not have the same level of dedicated features as Zephyr.
User Interface: One significant difference between Jira and Zephyr lies in their user interfaces. Jira has a more general project management interface that covers various aspects of project organization, including issue tracking, agile boards, and workflow management. On the other hand, Zephyr focuses solely on the test management aspect and provides a more streamlined and specialized user interface.
Pricing and Licensing: Jira offers different pricing plans depending on the number of users and the desired features, making it suitable for both small and large organizations. Zephyr, being a plugin for Jira, follows the same pricing structure as Jira and requires a separate subscription. However, there might be some additional costs associated with utilizing Zephyr's advanced features.
Customization and Flexibility: Jira provides a high level of customization and flexibility to adapt to various project requirements. Users can configure workflows, create custom fields, and tailor the system to their specific needs. While Zephyr inherits most of Jira's customizability, it also comes with its own set of predefined fields and configurations specifically designed for test management.
Dashboard and Reporting: Jira offers visually appealing dashboards and comprehensive reporting capabilities that cover various aspects of project management. These reports include burndown charts, velocity charts, and agile project reports. Zephyr, with its focus on test management, provides test-specific reports that give insights into test execution, coverage, and defects.

Jira vs Zephyr

Overview

Jira vs Zephyr: What are the differences?