StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Languages
  5. Scala vs Swift

Scala vs Swift

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Swift
Swift
Stacks21.9K
Followers13.6K
Votes1.3K
Scala
Scala
Stacks11.9K
Followers7.8K
Votes1.5K
GitHub Stars14.4K
Forks3.1K

Scala vs Swift: What are the differences?

Introduction

Scala and Swift are both programming languages that have gained popularity in recent years. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Type System: One of the major differences between Scala and Swift is their type systems. Scala has a more powerful and complex type system compared to Swift. It supports advanced features like higher-order types and type-level computation, which allows for more flexibility and expressive code. On the other hand, Swift has a more simplified and concise type system, which makes it easier to learn and use for beginners.

  2. Concurrency Model: Another significant difference between Scala and Swift is their concurrency models. Scala has built-in support for Actors, which are lightweight threads of execution that communicate through message passing. This allows for easy concurrent and parallel programming. Swift, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for Actors. Instead, it provides tools like Grand Central Dispatch (GCD) for performing concurrent programming tasks.

  3. Functional Programming: Scala is a hybrid programming language that supports both object-oriented and functional programming paradigms. It incorporates many functional programming concepts like immutability, higher-order functions, and pattern matching. Swift, on the other hand, is primarily an object-oriented programming language with some functional programming features. While Swift does support higher-order functions and closures, it does not have built-in support for more advanced functional programming concepts like partial application or currying.

  4. Interoperability: Scala and Swift have different levels of interoperability with existing codebases. Scala, being built on top of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), can seamlessly call Java code and use existing Java libraries. This makes it easier to integrate Scala into existing Java-based projects. Swift, on the other hand, was developed by Apple and is primarily used for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS development. While it is possible to call C and Objective-C code from Swift, the interoperability with other programming languages or platforms is limited compared to Scala.

  5. Tooling and Ecosystem: The tooling and ecosystem around Scala and Swift are also quite different. Scala has a rich ecosystem with numerous libraries and frameworks available for various purposes. It has well-established build tools like sbt and popular frameworks like Play Framework and Akka. Swift, being primarily used for Apple platforms, has a more focused ecosystem with tools and frameworks specifically designed for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS development. It has Xcode as the primary development tool and frameworks like SwiftUI and Combine for developing user interfaces and reactive programming.

  6. Community and Adoption: Scala and Swift also have differences in terms of community and adoption. Scala has a strong community and is widely adopted in industries like finance and data science. It has been around since 2003 and has a mature ecosystem with many successful projects and companies using it. Swift, on the other hand, is a relatively newer language that was introduced by Apple in 2014. It quickly gained popularity and is now widely used for iOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS development. Swift has a large and active community, with continuous growth in adoption.

In summary, Scala and Swift have key differences in their type systems, concurrency models, functional programming support, interoperability, tooling, ecosystem, and community/adoption. Scala has a more powerful and complex type system, built-in support for Actors, and a stronger emphasis on functional programming. It is highly interoperable with Java code and has a rich ecosystem with a strong community. On the other hand, Swift has a simplified type system, uses tools like GCD for concurrency, has limited functional programming support, and is primarily focused on iOS/macOS development with a more targeted ecosystem and community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Swift, Scala

Nicholas
Nicholas

Jan 29, 2021

Decided

I am working in the domain of big data and machine learning. I am helping companies with bringing their machine learning models to the production. In many projects there is a tendency to port Python, PySpark code to Scala and Scala Spark.

This yields to longer time to market and a lot of mistakes due to necessity to understand and re-write the code. Also many libraries/apis that data scientists/machine learning practitioners use are not available in jvm ecosystem.

Simply, refactoring (if necessary) and organising the code of the data scientists by following best practices of software development is less error prone and faster comparing to re-write in Scala.

Pipeline orchestration tools such as Luigi/Airflow is python native and fits well to this picture.

I have heard some arguments against Python such as, it is slow, or it is hard to maintain due to its dynamically typed language. However cost/benefit of time consumed porting python code to java/scala alone would be enough as a counter-argument. ML pipelines rarerly contains a lot of code (if that is not the case, such as complex domain and significant amount of code, then scala would be a better fit).

In terms of performance, I did not see any issues with Python. It is not the fastest runtime around but ML applications are rarely time-critical (majority of them is batch based).

I still prefer Scala for developing APIs and for applications where the domain contains complex logic.

198k views198k
Comments
Gabor
Gabor

CTO at momento.

Aug 23, 2021

Decided

As a startup, we need the maximum flexibility and the ability to reach our customers in a more suitable way. So a hybrid application approach is the best because it allows you to develop a cross-platform application in a unique codebase. The choice behind Ionic is Angular, I think that angular is the best framework to develop a complex application that needs a lot of service interaction, its modularity forces you (the developer) to write the code in the correct way, so it can be maintainable and reusable.

209k views209k
Comments
vargamatyas
vargamatyas

Nov 22, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonSwiftSwiftReact NativeReact Native

Hey guys, I learned the basics (OOP, data structures & some algorithms) with Python, but now I want to learn iOS development. I am considering to learn Swift, but I am afraid how the native mobile development will die out because of the cross-platform frameworks and reviews. My idea is to learn web development first and then learn React Native, and after all of that, finally Swift. What do you think about this roadmap? Should I just learn Swift first due to the pros of the native apps?

126k views126k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Swift
Swift
Scala
Scala

Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C.

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
14.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.1K
Stacks
21.9K
Stacks
11.9K
Followers
13.6K
Followers
7.8K
Votes
1.3K
Votes
1.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 259
    Ios
  • 180
    Elegant
  • 126
    Not Objective-C
  • 107
    Backed by apple
  • 93
    Type inference
Cons
  • 6
    Must own a mac
  • 2
    Memory leaks are not uncommon
  • 1
    Complicated process for exporting modules
  • 1
    Very irritatingly picky about things that’s
  • 1
    Is a lot more effort than lua to make simple functions
Pros
  • 188
    Static typing
  • 178
    Pattern-matching
  • 175
    Jvm
  • 172
    Scala is fun
  • 138
    Types
Cons
  • 11
    Slow compilation time
  • 7
    Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
  • 6
    Too few developers available
  • 4
    Complicated subtyping
  • 2
    My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff
Integrations
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Cocoa Touch (iOS)
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Swift, Scala?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Rust

Rust

Rust is a systems programming language that combines strong compile-time correctness guarantees with fast performance. It improves upon the ideas of other systems languages like C++ by providing guaranteed memory safety (no crashes, no data races) and complete control over the lifecycle of memory.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase