Ansible vs Bamboo

Overview

Ansible

Stacks19.5K

Followers15.6K

Votes1.3K

GitHub Stars66.9K

Forks24.1K

Bamboo

Stacks504

Followers549

Votes17

Ansible vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Key differences between Ansible and Bamboo

Installation and setup: Ansible is an open-source automation tool that can be easily installed and set up on various platforms, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. On the other hand, Bamboo is a commercial Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD) tool that requires a dedicated server for installation and configuration.
Configuration management: Ansible focuses on configuration management and allows users to define infrastructure as code using simple YAML-based playbooks. It follows a push-based model, where the control machine pushes the configurations to the target hosts. Bamboo, on the other hand, primarily acts as a CI/CD tool and does not provide extensive configuration management capabilities.
Supported technologies: Ansible supports a wide range of technologies and platforms, including cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as networking devices, databases, and more. Bamboo, on the other hand, is primarily focused on building, testing, and deploying software applications. It provides integrations with popular development tools like Git, JIRA, and Maven.
Scalability and performance: Ansible is designed to be highly scalable and can handle thousands of hosts simultaneously. It utilizes an agentless architecture, where remote hosts do not require any additional software or daemons to be installed. Bamboo, on the other hand, may face scalability challenges as the number of build agents and concurrent builds increase, requiring additional resources and configuration.
Community and support: Ansible has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, modules, and playbooks. It also has an enterprise version called Ansible Tower, which offers additional features, support, and integration options. Bamboo, being a commercial product, offers official support from Atlassian, the company behind Bamboo, along with paid add-ons and plugins.
Ease of use and learning curve: Ansible has a relatively low learning curve and is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It uses a declarative language (YAML) for defining tasks and configurations, making it straightforward for beginners to understand and deploy. Bamboo, on the other hand, requires a bit more learning and configuration, especially when setting up build plans and defining deployment workflows.

In summary, Ansible is an open-source automation tool with a strong focus on configuration management, providing extensive platform and technology support. On the other hand, Bamboo is a commercial CI/CD tool primarily designed for building, testing, and deploying software applications, offering enterprise support and integrations with popular development tools.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Ansible, Bamboo

Anonymous

Sep 17, 2019

Needs advice

I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)

I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.

The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.

329k views329k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ansible	Bamboo
Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.	Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
Ansible's natural automation language allows sysadmins, developers, and IT managers to complete automation projects in hours, not weeks.;Ansible uses SSH by default instead of requiring agents everywhere. Avoid extra open ports, improve security, eliminate "managing the management", and reclaim CPU cycles.;Ansible automates app deployment, configuration management, workflow orchestration, and even cloud provisioning all from one system.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 66.9K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 24.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 19.5K	Stacks 504
Followers 15.6K	Followers 549
Votes 1.3K	Votes 17
Pros & Cons
Pros 284 Agentless 210 Great configuration 199 Simple 176 Powerful 155 Easy to learn Cons 8 Dangerous 5 Hard to install 3 Bloated 3 Backward compatibility 3 Doesn't Run on Windows	Pros 10 Integrates with other Atlassian tools 4 Great notification scheme 2 Great UI 1 Has Deployment Projects Cons 6 Expensive 1 Bad integration with docker 1 Bad UI 1 Low community support
Integrations
Nexmo Stackdriver VMware vSphere Docker OpenStack Amazon EC2 Rackspace Cloud Servers Google Compute Engine New Relic PagerDuty	Confluence Jira Bitbucket HipChat

What are some alternatives to Ansible, Bamboo?

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Related Comparisons

Ansible vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Key differences between Ansible and Bamboo

Installation and setup: Ansible is an open-source automation tool that can be easily installed and set up on various platforms, including Linux, Windows, and macOS. On the other hand, Bamboo is a commercial Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD) tool that requires a dedicated server for installation and configuration.
Configuration management: Ansible focuses on configuration management and allows users to define infrastructure as code using simple YAML-based playbooks. It follows a push-based model, where the control machine pushes the configurations to the target hosts. Bamboo, on the other hand, primarily acts as a CI/CD tool and does not provide extensive configuration management capabilities.
Supported technologies: Ansible supports a wide range of technologies and platforms, including cloud providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, as well as networking devices, databases, and more. Bamboo, on the other hand, is primarily focused on building, testing, and deploying software applications. It provides integrations with popular development tools like Git, JIRA, and Maven.
Scalability and performance: Ansible is designed to be highly scalable and can handle thousands of hosts simultaneously. It utilizes an agentless architecture, where remote hosts do not require any additional software or daemons to be installed. Bamboo, on the other hand, may face scalability challenges as the number of build agents and concurrent builds increase, requiring additional resources and configuration.
Community and support: Ansible has a large and active community of users and contributors, providing extensive documentation, modules, and playbooks. It also has an enterprise version called Ansible Tower, which offers additional features, support, and integration options. Bamboo, being a commercial product, offers official support from Atlassian, the company behind Bamboo, along with paid add-ons and plugins.
Ease of use and learning curve: Ansible has a relatively low learning curve and is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It uses a declarative language (YAML) for defining tasks and configurations, making it straightforward for beginners to understand and deploy. Bamboo, on the other hand, requires a bit more learning and configuration, especially when setting up build plans and defining deployment workflows.

Ansible vs Bamboo

Overview

Ansible vs Bamboo: What are the differences?

Introduction