Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Ansible vs Octopus Deploy: What are the differences?
Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Ansible and Octopus Deploy, highlighting the key differences between the two.
Installation and Architecture: Ansible is a server-agentless configuration management tool, while Octopus Deploy is a server-agent based deployment automation tool. Ansible uses SSH or WinRM to connect to remote servers, while Octopus Deploy requires agents to be installed on target machines. Ansible follows a push-based model, where the controller pushes configurations to the target machines, while Octopus Deploy follows a pull-based model, where agents pull deployments from the Octopus Server.
Supported Platforms: Ansible is platform-agnostic and can be used to manage and configure a wide range of operating systems and platforms. It supports Linux, Unix, macOS, and Windows. On the other hand, Octopus Deploy primarily focuses on deploying applications to Windows servers, with limited support for Linux and macOS.
Configuration Management: Ansible provides a declarative approach to configuration management, where desired states are declared and Ansible takes care of reaching those states. It uses YAML-based playbooks to define tasks and configurations. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, focuses more on deployment management than configuration management. It allows for more flexibility in defining deployment processes and workflows, but lacks the extensive configuration management capabilities of Ansible.
Scalability and Orchestration: Ansible is designed to work at a large scale and supports orchestrating and managing configurations across thousands of servers. It provides advanced features like dynamic inventory, parallel execution, and rolling updates to handle large-scale deployments efficiently. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is more suited for smaller to medium-sized deployments and may not be as scalable as Ansible for large-scale environments.
Integration and Ecosystem: Ansible has a large and active community, with a vast ecosystem of modules, plugins, and integrations available. It can be easily integrated with other DevOps tools and has extensive support for various cloud platforms, containerization technologies, and version control systems. Octopus Deploy has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Ansible, with limited integrations and plugins available.
Pricing and Licensing: Ansible is an open-source tool under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and is available for free. It also offers a commercial version, Ansible Tower, with additional features and enterprise support. Octopus Deploy is a commercial tool and follows a subscription-based licensing model. It offers different pricing tiers based on the number of target deployment targets and users.
In summary, Ansible is an agentless configuration management tool with broader platform support, extensive configuration management capabilities, and a larger ecosystem. Octopus Deploy, on the other hand, is a deployment automation tool with focus on Windows deployments, flexible deployment workflows, and a more limited ecosystem.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Ansible
- Agentless284
- Great configuration210
- Simple199
- Powerful176
- Easy to learn155
- Flexible69
- Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done55
- Makes sense35
- Super efficient and flexible30
- Powerful27
- Dynamic Inventory11
- Backed by Red Hat9
- Works with AWS7
- Cloud Oriented6
- Easy to maintain6
- Vagrant provisioner4
- Simple and powerful4
- Multi language4
- Simple4
- Because SSH4
- Procedural or declarative, or both4
- Easy4
- Consistency3
- Well-documented2
- Masterless2
- Debugging is simple2
- Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera2
- Fast as hell2
- Manage any OS1
- Work on windows, but difficult to manage1
- Certified Content1
Pros of Octopus Deploy
- Powerful30
- Simplicity25
- Easy to learn20
- .Net oriented17
- Easy to manage releases and rollback14
- Allows multitenancy8
- Nice interface4
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ansible
- Dangerous8
- Hard to install5
- Doesn't Run on Windows3
- Bloated3
- Backward compatibility3
- No immutable infrastructure2
Cons of Octopus Deploy
- Poor UI4
- Config & variables not versioned (e.g. in git)2
- Management of Config2