Asana vs Teambition

Overview

Asana

Stacks9.8K

Followers7.3K

Votes655

Teambition

Stacks12

Followers22

Votes0

Asana vs Teambition: What are the differences?

Introduction

Asana and Teambition are two popular project management tools that help teams collaborate and stay organized. While both tools offer similar features, there are several key differences between them.

Pricing Models: Asana offers a tiered pricing model, with different plans targeting various user needs. These plans include Basic, Premium, Business, and Enterprise. On the other hand, Teambition provides a freemium model, offering basic features for free, but charging for advanced functionalities and additional team members. This difference in pricing models allows users to choose the option that best fits their budget and requirements.
Task Management: Asana provides a robust task management system, allowing users to create and assign tasks, set due dates, prioritize tasks, and track progress. Teambition, on the other hand, focuses more on visual task boards, providing users with a Kanban-style interface for managing tasks. This difference in task management approaches caters to different user preferences and working styles.
Third-Party Integrations: Asana offers a wide range of third-party integrations, allowing users to connect their Asana workspace with other tools they use, such as Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, and more. Teambition, although it also offers some integrations, has a more limited selection. This difference in available integrations can affect the ability to streamline workflows and collaborate seamlessly across different platforms.
Collaboration Features: Asana puts a strong emphasis on collaboration features, providing users with the ability to comment on tasks, tag team members, and have discussions within the platform. Teambition also offers similar collaboration features, but it goes a step further by allowing users to create real-time chat groups, making it easier for team members to communicate and collaborate. This difference in collaboration capabilities can impact team communication and productivity.
Mobile Apps: Both Asana and Teambition offer mobile apps for iOS and Android devices. However, Asana's mobile app is generally considered to be more feature-rich and intuitive, providing users with a seamless mobile experience. Teambition's mobile app, while functional, may have a slight learning curve and not as many advanced features as its web version. This difference in mobile app quality can influence user experience and productivity on-the-go.
User Interface Design: Asana has a clean and modern user interface design, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. Teambition, on the other hand, has a more visually oriented design, with colorful elements and a visually appealing interface. This difference in user interface design can affect user preferences and the overall user experience.

In Summary, Asana and Teambition differs in their pricing models, task management approaches, available integrations, collaboration features, mobile app quality, and user interface design.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Asana, Teambition

Mike

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceon

Aha!

Trello

Asana

I'm comparing Aha!, Trello and Asana. We are looking for it as a Product Management Team. Jira handles all our development and storyboard etc. This is for Product Management for Roadmaps, Backlogs, future stories, etc. Cost is a factor, as well. Does anyone have a comparison chart of Pros and Cons? Thank you.

492k views492k

Comments

Ivan

Founder - Dateno, Director - NGO "Informational Culture" / Ambassador - OKFN Armenia at Infoculture

Mar 24, 2020

Decided

Both Asana and Trello support Kanban style project tracking. Trello is Kanban-only project management, knowledge management, actually card-management tools. Asana is much more complex, supports different project management approaches, well integrated and helpful for any style/type project.

We choose Asana finally, but still some projects kept in Trello

235k views235k

Comments

Abhay

Product Manager at ibism

Mar 24, 2020

Decided

Procezo is an excellent free-for-life task managing tool with several benefits. Its clear, user-friendly interface is perfect for small businesses and startups as well as enterprise-level use. It makes it a seamless transition from any other project management tools. Its simple but effective layout allows new users to quickly adapt to its ever-expanding set of features. Procezo allows users to create boards and provide access to users or teams as required, set priority and precedence of the task and allowing for subtasks and discussions to be created. With unlimited tasks, users, projects and free support, Procezo is quickly making its way into businesses from across the world and the ultimate growth hack tool.

228k views228k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Asana	Teambition
Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.	It is an easy and efficient way to work, by creating tasks, sharing posts and documents, keeping track of your calendar and checking everyone's progress.
Updated in real-time;Multiple workspaces;People views;Follow tasks or projects;Real-time: see changes immediately;Activity feed for every task;iPhone & Android Apps;Email Bridge;REST API	Employee awards;Social recognition;Cultural alignment;Feedback collection;Surveys & feedback;Employee management;Employee reward programs;Real time data
Statistics
Stacks 9.8K	Stacks 12
Followers 7.3K	Followers 22
Votes 655	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 160 Super fast task creation 150 Flexible project management 101 Free up to 15 99 Followers and commenting on tasks 57 Integration with external services Cons 0 Not Cross Platform	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Dropbox Crashlytics Rollbar Honeybadger Notism	BugMuncher Dropbox Google Drive Marketo Geckoboard

What are some alternatives to Asana, Teambition?

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

Redmine

Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database.

Taskulu

Taskulu is a collaborative project planning service. It combines task management, real-time chat and time tracking into a single interface.

Notion

A new tool that blends your everyday work apps into one. It's a unified and collaborative workspace for you and your team

Aha!

Set product strategy, visualize and share roadmaps, and articulate features so your product development teams can build what matters.

Ora

Ora enables you to customize your projects and collaborate the way you want! Choose an existing methodology or create your own. Ora has everything your team might need to boost productivity and collaborate! Task management, kanban, lists...

Shortcut

Shortcut combines a simple, modern UI with enterprise-grade tools, allowing technology companies to plan and manage their projects effectively, visualize progress across the organization, and define deadlines and milestones based upon data.

Related Comparisons

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack

Asana vs Teambition: What are the differences?

Introduction

Asana and Teambition are two popular project management tools that help teams collaborate and stay organized. While both tools offer similar features, there are several key differences between them.

Pricing Models: Asana offers a tiered pricing model, with different plans targeting various user needs. These plans include Basic, Premium, Business, and Enterprise. On the other hand, Teambition provides a freemium model, offering basic features for free, but charging for advanced functionalities and additional team members. This difference in pricing models allows users to choose the option that best fits their budget and requirements.
Task Management: Asana provides a robust task management system, allowing users to create and assign tasks, set due dates, prioritize tasks, and track progress. Teambition, on the other hand, focuses more on visual task boards, providing users with a Kanban-style interface for managing tasks. This difference in task management approaches caters to different user preferences and working styles.
Third-Party Integrations: Asana offers a wide range of third-party integrations, allowing users to connect their Asana workspace with other tools they use, such as Google Drive, Slack, GitHub, and more. Teambition, although it also offers some integrations, has a more limited selection. This difference in available integrations can affect the ability to streamline workflows and collaborate seamlessly across different platforms.
Collaboration Features: Asana puts a strong emphasis on collaboration features, providing users with the ability to comment on tasks, tag team members, and have discussions within the platform. Teambition also offers similar collaboration features, but it goes a step further by allowing users to create real-time chat groups, making it easier for team members to communicate and collaborate. This difference in collaboration capabilities can impact team communication and productivity.
Mobile Apps: Both Asana and Teambition offer mobile apps for iOS and Android devices. However, Asana's mobile app is generally considered to be more feature-rich and intuitive, providing users with a seamless mobile experience. Teambition's mobile app, while functional, may have a slight learning curve and not as many advanced features as its web version. This difference in mobile app quality can influence user experience and productivity on-the-go.
User Interface Design: Asana has a clean and modern user interface design, with a focus on simplicity and ease of use. Teambition, on the other hand, has a more visually oriented design, with colorful elements and a visually appealing interface. This difference in user interface design can affect user preferences and the overall user experience.

In Summary, Asana and Teambition differs in their pricing models, task management approaches, available integrations, collaboration features, mobile app quality, and user interface design.