StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bamboo vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins X

Bamboo vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bamboo
Bamboo
Stacks504
Followers549
Votes17
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Stacks2.3K
Followers1.6K
Votes75
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800

Bamboo vs GitLab CI vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

Introduction: Bamboo, GitLab CI, and Jenkins X are all popular continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) tools used in software development. Each tool has its own features and capabilities that differentiate it from the others. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Bamboo, GitLab CI, and Jenkins X.

  1. Integration with Version Control Systems: One key difference between Bamboo, GitLab CI, and Jenkins X is how they integrate with version control systems. Bamboo primarily integrates with Git, Mercurial, and Subversion, providing seamless integration and version control management. GitLab CI, on the other hand, is tightly integrated with GitLab, offering built-in version control capabilities and features like repository management and code collaboration. Jenkins X also integrates with Git, but it specifically focuses on GitOps workflows, where the entire application lifecycle is defined in Git repositories.

  2. Pipeline Configuration and Orchestration: Another difference lies in how these tools handle pipeline configuration and orchestration. Bamboo uses a web-based graphical interface where users can visually create and configure pipelines using a drag-and-drop approach. GitLab CI, on the other hand, uses a YAML-based configuration file called .gitlab-ci.yml, where users define their pipelines and job configurations using code. Jenkins X also uses a YAML-based approach, but it embraces the concept of using Helm charts and Kubernetes as the underlying infrastructure for pipeline execution and management.

  3. Deployment Environments: The deployment environments supported by each tool also differ. Bamboo supports a wide range of deployment environments, including on-premises servers, cloud platforms, and containers, making it highly flexible. GitLab CI offers similar flexibility and supports various deployment options. However, Jenkins X focuses specifically on cloud-native development and provides native support for deploying applications to Kubernetes clusters using Helm charts.

  4. Integration with Testing Frameworks: When it comes to integration with testing frameworks, the three tools have different approaches. Bamboo offers a range of built-in testing features, including the ability to run automated tests, perform test coverage analysis, and generate test reports. GitLab CI also provides extensive support for testing, with features like parallel test execution, code quality analysis, and security scanning. Jenkins X, while not offering specific built-in testing features, integrates well with leading testing frameworks and tools, allowing users to easily incorporate testing into their CI/CD pipelines.

  5. Built-in Collaboration and Code Review: Collaboration and code review are important aspects of software development, and these tools differ in their approach to these areas. Bamboo offers basic collaboration features like notifications, comments, and activity logs but does not have dedicated code review capabilities. GitLab CI, being part of the GitLab ecosystem, offers powerful collaboration and code review features, including merge requests, discussions, inline code commenting, and peer review workflows. Jenkins X, as it promotes GitOps workflows, encourages code review as part of the Git-based development process, utilizing features of Git platforms like GitLab.

  6. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Lastly, the ease of use and learning curve associated with each tool is worth considering. Bamboo provides a user-friendly interface and a straightforward setup process, making it relatively easy to get started. GitLab CI offers a comprehensive and well-documented set of features but may have a steeper learning curve due to the need to understand GitLab's broader ecosystem. Jenkins X, with its focus on cloud-native development and Kubernetes, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with these technologies but offers extensive documentation and community support for assistance.

In summary, Bamboo, GitLab CI, and Jenkins X differ in their integration with version control systems, pipeline configuration and orchestration approaches, deployment environments, integration with testing frameworks, collaboration and code review capabilities, and ease of use and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bamboo, GitLab CI, Jenkins X

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Feb 14, 2020

Decided

Buddy is one of the most easy-to-use tools for CI I ever met. When I needed to set up the pipeline I was really impressed with how easy it is to create it with Buddy with only a few moments. It's literally like:

  1. Add repo
  2. Click - Click - Click
  3. You're done and your app is on prod :D The top feature that I've found is a simple integration with different notification channels - not only Slack (which is the one by default), but Telegram and Discord. The support is also neat - guys respond pretty quickly on even a small issue.
157k views157k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bamboo
Bamboo
GitLab CI
GitLab CI
Jenkins X
Jenkins X

Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.

GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

--
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
800
Stacks
504
Stacks
2.3K
Stacks
147
Followers
549
Followers
1.6K
Followers
370
Votes
17
Votes
75
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    Integrates with other Atlassian tools
  • 4
    Great notification scheme
  • 2
    Great UI
  • 1
    Has Deployment Projects
Cons
  • 6
    Expensive
  • 1
    Bad integration with docker
  • 1
    Bad UI
  • 1
    Low community support
Pros
  • 22
    Robust CI with awesome Docker support
  • 13
    Simple configuration
  • 9
    All in one solution
  • 7
    Source Control and CI in one place
  • 5
    Free and open source
Cons
  • 2
    Works best with GitLab repositories
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Integrations
Confluence
Confluence
Jira
Jira
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
HipChat
HipChat
GitLab
GitLab
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to Bamboo, GitLab CI, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana