StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. BlazeMeter vs Runscope

BlazeMeter vs Runscope

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Runscope
Runscope
Stacks130
Followers173
Votes60
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter
Stacks68
Followers158
Votes13

BlazeMeter vs Runscope: What are the differences?

Introduction

BlazeMeter and Runscope are two popular tools used for API and performance testing. Both tools have their unique features and functionalities that differentiate them from each other. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between BlazeMeter and Runscope.

  1. Flexibility of Deployment: BlazeMeter offers more flexibility in deployment options compared to Runscope. With BlazeMeter, users can choose to run tests on their cloud infrastructure or on-premises, which provides more control and customization options. On the other hand, Runscope primarily focuses on cloud-based deployment and doesn't offer as many options for on-premises deployment.

  2. Load Testing Capabilities: BlazeMeter is known for its powerful load testing capabilities. It offers a wide range of load testing features such as spike testing, concurrency testing, and stress testing. On the other hand, Runscope doesn't provide as extensive load testing features and is mainly focused on API monitoring and testing.

  3. Integration with Development Tools: BlazeMeter provides seamless integration with popular development tools like Jenkins, JIRA, and more. This allows developers to incorporate performance testing into their development workflow easily. Runscope also offers integrations with various tools, but it doesn't have the same level of integrations as BlazeMeter.

  4. Scalability: BlazeMeter is designed to handle large-scale testing scenarios with thousands of concurrent users. It leverages cloud infrastructure and distributed load generators to scale tests according to the demand. Runscope, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller-scale testing scenarios and may not be as effective for high-load testing.

  5. Team Collaboration and Reporting: BlazeMeter offers advanced team collaboration and reporting features. It allows multiple team members to work together on test scenarios, share results, and generate customized reports. Runscope also provides collaboration features, but they may not be as extensive as the ones offered by BlazeMeter.

  6. Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of BlazeMeter and Runscope differs significantly. BlazeMeter offers various pricing plans based on the required features and usage, providing more flexibility for users with different testing requirements. Runscope, on the other hand, has a fixed pricing model that may not be as suitable for users with specific or fluctuating testing needs.

In summary, BlazeMeter provides more flexibility in deployment, extensive load testing capabilities, broader integration options, scalability for large-scale testing, advanced team collaboration and reporting features, and flexible pricing plans compared to Runscope, which primarily focuses on cloud-based deployment, API monitoring, and fixed pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Runscope
Runscope
BlazeMeter
BlazeMeter

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

Runscope Radar: Automatically monitor your APIs from around the globe. Integrates with PagerDuty, New Relic Insights, Keen IO, HipChat, Slack and more. Test complete API workflows with powerful assertions and notifications.; Runscope Metrics: API performance and usage reports.; Runscope API Traffic Inspector: Log and view API calls from any language or framework to any API to solve integration problems.
100% JMeter Compatible- Take full advantage of JMeter’s scripting capabilities or let our auto-scripting feature take care of the details.;Scalable and Realistic- Easily scale from 100 to 300,000+ concurrent users using realistic visitor behaviour and browser simulation.;Start Testing in 2 Minutes- Use up to 100 dedicated servers per test. No setup or installation required. Self-service and on-demand.;Intuitive Reporting- See test results in real time or easily compare multiple tests. All with a simple to use interface and intuitive graphs.;Pay only for what you need- Flexible pricing that accommodates hourly, monthly or annual usage. No setup or maintenance fees.<br>
Statistics
Stacks
130
Stacks
68
Followers
173
Followers
158
Votes
60
Votes
13
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Great features
  • 15
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Nicely priced
  • 4
    Free plan
  • 2
    No install needed - runs on cloud
Pros
  • 10
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
Cons
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric
Integrations
Keen
Keen
GitHub
GitHub
New Relic
New Relic
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Heroku
Heroku
HipChat
HipChat
CircleCI
CircleCI
Zapier
Zapier
Grove
Grove
VictorOps
VictorOps
TeamCity
TeamCity
Jenkins
Jenkins
Bamboo
Bamboo
CloudBees
CloudBees
Heroku
Heroku
New Relic
New Relic
AppDynamics
AppDynamics
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Travis CI
Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Runscope, BlazeMeter?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

k6

k6

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.

Locust

Locust

Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Gatling

Gatling

Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope