Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BlazeMeter vs Runscope: What are the differences?
Introduction
BlazeMeter and Runscope are two popular tools used for API and performance testing. Both tools have their unique features and functionalities that differentiate them from each other. In this article, we will discuss the key differences between BlazeMeter and Runscope.
Flexibility of Deployment: BlazeMeter offers more flexibility in deployment options compared to Runscope. With BlazeMeter, users can choose to run tests on their cloud infrastructure or on-premises, which provides more control and customization options. On the other hand, Runscope primarily focuses on cloud-based deployment and doesn't offer as many options for on-premises deployment.
Load Testing Capabilities: BlazeMeter is known for its powerful load testing capabilities. It offers a wide range of load testing features such as spike testing, concurrency testing, and stress testing. On the other hand, Runscope doesn't provide as extensive load testing features and is mainly focused on API monitoring and testing.
Integration with Development Tools: BlazeMeter provides seamless integration with popular development tools like Jenkins, JIRA, and more. This allows developers to incorporate performance testing into their development workflow easily. Runscope also offers integrations with various tools, but it doesn't have the same level of integrations as BlazeMeter.
Scalability: BlazeMeter is designed to handle large-scale testing scenarios with thousands of concurrent users. It leverages cloud infrastructure and distributed load generators to scale tests according to the demand. Runscope, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller-scale testing scenarios and may not be as effective for high-load testing.
Team Collaboration and Reporting: BlazeMeter offers advanced team collaboration and reporting features. It allows multiple team members to work together on test scenarios, share results, and generate customized reports. Runscope also provides collaboration features, but they may not be as extensive as the ones offered by BlazeMeter.
Pricing Structure: The pricing structure of BlazeMeter and Runscope differs significantly. BlazeMeter offers various pricing plans based on the required features and usage, providing more flexibility for users with different testing requirements. Runscope, on the other hand, has a fixed pricing model that may not be as suitable for users with specific or fluctuating testing needs.
In summary, BlazeMeter provides more flexibility in deployment, extensive load testing capabilities, broader integration options, scalability for large-scale testing, advanced team collaboration and reporting features, and flexible pricing plans compared to Runscope, which primarily focuses on cloud-based deployment, API monitoring, and fixed pricing model.
Pros of BlazeMeter
- I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.10
- Easy to prepare JMeter workers3
Pros of Runscope
- Great features17
- Easy to use15
- Nicely priced4
- Free plan4
- No install needed - runs on cloud2
- Decent2
- Collections1
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent1
- Awesome customer support1
- Import scripts from sources including Postman1
- Shareable Collections1
- Global & Collection level variables1
- Graphical view of response times historically1
- Integrations - StatusPage, PagerDuty, HipChat, Victorop1
- Run tests from multiple locations across globe1
- Schedule test collections to auto-run at intervals1
- Auto Re-run failed scheduled tests before notifying1
- Makes developing REST APIs easy1
- History feature - call history and response history1
- Restrict access by teams1
- Fully featured without looking cluttered1
- Can save and share scripts1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BlazeMeter
- Costly1
- UI centric1