Buffer vs IFTTT vs Zapier

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1

+ 1

Buffer vs IFTTT vs Zapier: What are the differences?

Buffer, IFTTT, and Zapier are all popular automation tools that help streamline processes and tasks online. Each tool has its own unique features and functionalities. Here are key differences between Buffer, IFTTT, and Zapier:

  1. Integration Capabilities: Buffer focuses primarily on social media automation and scheduling, allowing users to manage multiple social accounts and schedule posts. IFTTT (If This Then That) offers a wide range of app integrations and allows users to create automated tasks (called applets) based on triggers and actions. Zapier, similar to IFTTT, offers integration with various apps, but it specializes in creating workflows (called Zaps) that enable multi-step integrations between different apps.

  2. Complexity of Automations: Buffer offers a straightforward user interface for scheduling and publishing social media content, making it easy to use even for beginners. IFTTT provides a simple way to create basic applets but lacks the complexity required for advanced workflows. Zapier, on the other hand, provides a more extensive range of customization options and integration possibilities, catering to users who require more advanced automations.

  3. Task Execution: Buffer primarily focuses on scheduling and publishing social media content, allowing users to curate and share posts. IFTTT operates on the principle of triggers and actions, where a trigger from one app can result in an action on another app. Zapier allows users to create complex workflows with multiple triggers and actions.

  4. Pricing Model: Buffer offers both a free plan and paid plans with additional features and social account support. IFTTT provides a free tier for basic users and a paid subscription for more advanced features and increased automation limits. Zapier, while also offering a free version with limited functionalities, primarily operates on a paid subscription model based on the number of Zaps and tasks required.

  5. Customization Options: Buffer provides basic customization options for post scheduling, but it may not cater to users looking for highly tailored automations. IFTTT offers a range of customization possibilities by allowing users to connect different apps and define triggers and actions. Zapier provides extensive customization options with its multi-step workflows, enabling users to create highly specific and customized automations.

In Summary, Buffer is focused on social media scheduling, IFTTT excels in connecting different apps through simple applets, and Zapier offers advanced integrations and complex workflows for those who require more robust automation capabilities.

Advice on Buffer, IFTTT, and Zapier
Needs advice

Hey! We are Raisegiving, a payments platform geared towards helping nonprofits raise money and manage donors. We are looking to give our Users (Admins of nonprofits) the ability to integrate their Raisegiving account with other tools such as Mailchimp and QuickBooks.

Examples of desired use cases:

  • Users should be able to sync Raisegiving audience with their Mailchimp audience, trigger the creation of a new Mailchimp audience based on data from their Raisegiving account.
  • Donations made on our platform should sync with users Quickbooks account.

Does anyone have any helpful insights into the pros and cons of Tray.io vs Zapier?

See more
Replies (1)
Bob Bass
President & Full Stack Enginee at Narro, LLC · | 3 upvotes · 37.1K views

Tray.io is expensive and only makes sense in a few rare occasions where you need 2-way constant data binding in a 'loop' where Zapier is more like an automation swiss army knife. Tray.io is aimed exclusively at enterprise while Zapier supports businesses of any size. Tray.io is very expensive and Zapier is much more reasonable especially early on before you have massive amounts of zaps.

You may also want to look at Integromat but Zapier would be my choice in this case. I almost don't see Tray.io as being something worth considering for your particular use case unless there's a massive scale behind your product that I'm unaware of (absurd amounts of tasks in the hundreds of thousands).

Zapier also has a great community and an "experts" program in the event that you want to outsource your automation.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Buffer
Pros of IFTTT
Pros of Zapier
  • 50
    Super simple to schedule tweets
  • 24
    Buffer from my browser; integrates with my work flow
  • 9
    Awesome UI
  • 6
    Fair pricing
  • 4
    Weekly analytics report email
  • 3
    Re-buffer posts
  • 2
    Mobile App
  • 1
    Schedule tweets via API
  • 1
    Pablo for images
  • 1
    Easy to visualise time line
  • 21
    Lots of integrations
  • 17
  • 12
    Automates manual tasks
  • 11
    Life automation
  • 7
    Internet of things
  • 2
    Good User Experiance
  • 2
    Mobile Application
  • 45
    Sync cloud services
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 15
    Scheduled tasks
  • 8
    Great customer support
  • 6
    Integrates with Trello
  • 6
    Gives me updates anytime, anywhere

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Buffer
Cons of IFTTT
Cons of Zapier
  • 1
    Re-buffering a lot of tweets is pretty painful
  • 1
    Mobile app could use some work
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Buffer?

      Buffer helps you manage multiple social media accounts at once. Quickly schedule content from anywhere on the web, collaborate with team members, and analyze rich statistics on how your posts perform.

      What is IFTTT?

      It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

      What is Zapier?

      Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Buffer?
      What companies use IFTTT?
      What companies use Zapier?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Buffer?
      What tools integrate with IFTTT?
      What tools integrate with Zapier?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      Jul 2 2019 at 9:34PM


      Google AnalyticsAmazon S3New Relic+25
      What are some alternatives to Buffer, IFTTT, and Zapier?
      Sprout Social
      It is a social media management tool created to help businesses grow their social media presence. You can understand and reach your audience, engage your community and measure performance with the only all-in-one social media management platform built for connection.
      It manages all your social media in one place. From finding prospects to serving customers, it helps you do more with your social media. The system's user interface takes the form of a dashboard, and supports social network integrations.
      Stream allows you to build scalable feeds, activity streams, and chat. Stream’s simple, yet powerful API’s and SDKs are used by some of the largest and most popular applications for feeds and chat. SDKs available for most popular languages.
      JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
      Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
      See all alternatives