Datadog vs StatusCake

Overview

Datadog

Stacks9.8K

Followers8.2K

Votes861

StatusCake

Stacks118

Followers133

Votes56

Datadog vs StatusCake: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Datadog and StatusCake are both monitoring tools used to track the performance and availability of websites and applications.

Monitoring Targets: Datadog primarily focuses on infrastructure monitoring, including servers, databases, and cloud services, while StatusCake specializes in website monitoring, including uptime, performance, and user experience.
Alerting Capabilities: Datadog offers a more advanced alerting system with customizable thresholds, anomaly detection, and integration with various notification channels, whereas StatusCake provides basic alerting features focusing primarily on website downtime notifications.
Feature Set: Datadog offers a comprehensive set of features for monitoring, logs, and APM (Application Performance Monitoring), allowing users to correlate data from different sources, while StatusCake is more limited in its feature set, primarily focusing on website uptime and performance monitoring.
Integration Ecosystem: Datadog has a wide range of integrations available, allowing users to sync and analyze data from various services and tools, while StatusCake has a smaller integration ecosystem, mainly focusing on essential tools for website monitoring.
User Interface: Datadog's user interface is more complex and geared towards technical users with advanced monitoring needs, whereas StatusCake provides a simpler and more user-friendly interface aimed at beginners and small businesses.
Pricing Model: Datadog follows a more complex pricing model based on the number of hosts and features used, making it suited for large enterprises, while StatusCake offers a straightforward pricing structure primarily based on the number of websites monitored, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses and individuals.

In Summary, Datadog and StatusCake differ in their monitoring targets, alerting capabilities, feature set, integration ecosystem, user interface, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Datadog, StatusCake

Farzeem Diamond

Software Engineer at IVP

Jul 21, 2020

Needs adviceon

Datadog

Dynatrace

AppDynamics

Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.

Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS

Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure

Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server

Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.

Please advise on the above. Thanks!

1.59M views1.59M

Comments

Medeti

Jun 27, 2020

Needs adviceon

Amazon EKS

Kubernetes

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

1.51M views1.51M

Comments

Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 17, 2019

Decided

I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).

The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight

NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon

457k views457k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Datadog	StatusCake
Datadog is the leading service for cloud-scale monitoring. It is used by IT, operations, and development teams who build and operate applications that run on dynamic or hybrid cloud infrastructure. Start monitoring in minutes with Datadog!	Monitoring a website is one thing – finding the best way to alert you to downtime another. At StatusCake we give you as many options as possible to decide when & how often you’re contacted. Whether it’s by email, SMS, push notifications for iOS & Android or integration with third party apps including Zapier and PagerDuty – you decide how you want to be alerted and when!
14-day Free Trial for an unlimited number of hosts;200+ turn-key integrations for data aggregation;Clean graphs of StatsD and other integrations;Slice and dice graphs and alerts by tags, roles, and more;Easy-to-use search for hosts, metrics, and tags;Alert notifications via e-mail and PagerDuty;Receive alerts on any metric, for a single host or an entire cluster;Full API access in more than 15 languages;Overlay metrics and events across disparate sources;Out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards;Easy way to compute rates, ratios, averages, or integrals;Sampling intervals of 10 seconds;Mute all alerts with 1 click during upgrades and maintenance;Tools for team collaboration	Truly Global Monitoring;SureAlert – No False Positives;Domain Monitoring;Real Browser Testing;SSL Certificate Monitoring;Malware and Virus Scanning;Manage complex alert rules with PagerDuty, get a great visual overview with Geckoboard, record your performance statistics and replay them beautifully with Librato or even make your own alert recipes with Zapier.;TCP, DNS, PING, and HTTP(s)!;Public Reporting
Statistics
Stacks 9.8K	Stacks 118
Followers 8.2K	Followers 133
Votes 861	Votes 56
Pros & Cons
Pros 140 Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc) 107 Easy setup 87 Powerful ui 84 Powerful integrations 70 Great value Cons 20 Expensive 4 No errors exception tracking 2 External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging 1 Complicated	Pros 14 Easy to use and reliable 12 Free tier 6 Public Reporting 4 Domain monitoring 3 Cheaper
Integrations
NGINX Google App Engine Apache HTTP Server Java Docker Pingdom MySQL Ruby Python Memcached	Zapier Librato PagerDuty Slack HipChat Pushover VictorOps Geckoboard

What are some alternatives to Datadog, StatusCake?

New Relic

The world’s best software and DevOps teams rely on New Relic to move faster, make better decisions and create best-in-class digital experiences. If you run software, you need to run New Relic. More than 50% of the Fortune 100 do too.

Pingdom

Pingdom is an uptime monitoring service. When problems happen with a site that Pingdom monitors, it immediately alerts the owner so the problem can be taken care of.

Better Stack

Better Stack is a radically better infrastructure monitoring platform that calls the right person on your team if anything goes wrong. Schedule on-call duties, receive helpful alerts, and collaborate on solving incidents faster than ever.

Raygun

Raygun gives you a window into how users are really experiencing your software applications. Detect, diagnose and resolve issues that are affecting end users with greater speed and accuracy.

AppSignal

AppSignal gives you and your team alerts and detailed metrics about your Ruby, Node.js or Elixir application. Sensible pricing, no aggressive sales & support by developers.

UptimeRobot

It is all about helping you to keep your websites up. It monitors your websites every 5 minutes and alerts you if your sites are down.

AppDynamics

AppDynamics develops application performance management (APM) solutions that deliver problem resolution for highly distributed applications through transaction flow monitoring and deep diagnostics.

Stackify

Stackify offers the only developers-friendly innovative cloud based solution that fully integrates application performance management (APM) with error and log. Allowing them to easily monitor, detect and resolve application issues faster

Skylight

Skylight is a smart profiler for your Rails apps that visualizes request performance across all of your servers.

updown.io

updown is an online service that checks your website's status by periodically sending an HTTP HEAD request to the URL of your choice. It then notifies you by email or sms when your website is not responding correctly.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Datadog vs StatusCake: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Datadog and StatusCake are both monitoring tools used to track the performance and availability of websites and applications.

Monitoring Targets: Datadog primarily focuses on infrastructure monitoring, including servers, databases, and cloud services, while StatusCake specializes in website monitoring, including uptime, performance, and user experience.
Alerting Capabilities: Datadog offers a more advanced alerting system with customizable thresholds, anomaly detection, and integration with various notification channels, whereas StatusCake provides basic alerting features focusing primarily on website downtime notifications.
Feature Set: Datadog offers a comprehensive set of features for monitoring, logs, and APM (Application Performance Monitoring), allowing users to correlate data from different sources, while StatusCake is more limited in its feature set, primarily focusing on website uptime and performance monitoring.
Integration Ecosystem: Datadog has a wide range of integrations available, allowing users to sync and analyze data from various services and tools, while StatusCake has a smaller integration ecosystem, mainly focusing on essential tools for website monitoring.
User Interface: Datadog's user interface is more complex and geared towards technical users with advanced monitoring needs, whereas StatusCake provides a simpler and more user-friendly interface aimed at beginners and small businesses.
Pricing Model: Datadog follows a more complex pricing model based on the number of hosts and features used, making it suited for large enterprises, while StatusCake offers a straightforward pricing structure primarily based on the number of websites monitored, making it more budget-friendly for small businesses and individuals.

In Summary, Datadog and StatusCake differ in their monitoring targets, alerting capabilities, feature set, integration ecosystem, user interface, and pricing model.