Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.6K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Git

Stacks303.7K

Followers184.2K

Votes6.6K

GitHub Stars57.1K

Forks26.9K

Git vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Git and GitLab are both version control systems that are used for managing and tracking changes in code repositories. However, there are some key differences between the two.

Hosted vs Self-hosted: Git is a distributed version control system that can be used locally or on remote servers. On the other hand, GitLab is a web-based Git repository manager that can be self-hosted or accessed through a hosted service.
Collaboration Features: Git provides basic collaboration features such as branching, merging, and pull requests. GitLab, on the other hand, offers enhanced collaboration features like issue tracking, code review, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines.
Access Control: Git has limited access control mechanisms and relies on the file system permissions for controlling access to repositories. GitLab, on the other hand, provides fine-grained access control with user roles, permissions, and group management.
Web UI: Git has a command-line interface (CLI) for performing actions, while GitLab provides a web-based user interface (UI) that makes it easier to navigate and interact with repositories.
Integration: Git can be integrated with various external tools and services using custom scripts and hooks. GitLab, on the other hand, has built-in integrations with popular development tools and services, making it easier to automate workflows.
Community and Support: Git has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support resources available. GitLab also has a growing community and offers commercial support for enterprise customers.

In summary, Git is a distributed version control system with basic collaboration features, while GitLab is a web-based Git repository manager that provides enhanced collaboration features, access control, a web UI, integrations, and commercial support options.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitLab, Git

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

623k views623k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Git
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars 57.1K
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks 26.9K
Stacks 63.6K	Stacks 303.7K
Followers 54.5K	Followers 184.2K
Votes 2.5K	Votes 6.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 1429 Distributed version control system 1053 Efficient branching and merging 959 Fast 843 Open source 726 Better than svn Cons 16 Hard to learn 11 Inconsistent command line interface 9 Easy to lose uncommitted work 8 Worst documentation ever possibly made 5 Awful merge handling

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Git?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.