StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs JitPack

GitHub vs JitPack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
JitPack
JitPack
Stacks35
Followers74
Votes12

GitHub vs JitPack: What are the differences?

Introduction: GitHub and JitPack are both popular platforms used in software development, but they differ in several aspects. This markdown code will present the key differences between GitHub and JitPack.

  1. Integration with Gradle/Maven:

    GitHub: It supports integration with Gradle and Maven build tools, allowing developers to easily manage dependencies and automate build processes. GitHub repositories can be added as dependencies in the build.gradle or pom.xml files.

    JitPack: It focuses solely on building Java libraries hosted on GitHub. Instead of using a dedicated repository manager like Maven or Gradle, JitPack directly reads the build files from GitHub repositories and builds the required dependencies on demand.

  2. Package Manager:

    GitHub: It does not have its own package manager. Developers need to manually manage dependencies by including the required JAR files or modules in their projects.

    JitPack: It acts as a package manager for Java libraries hosted on GitHub. Developers can easily include JitPack dependencies by specifying the GitHub repository and the version of the library they want to use.

  3. Caching and Versioning:

    GitHub: It relies on Git for version control, allowing developers to track changes in the source code and manage different versions of the project. However, GitHub does not provide built-in caching mechanisms for dependencies.

    JitPack: It offers caching and versioning capabilities. Once a library is built for a specific commit/tag, subsequent requests for the same commit/tag can be served from the cache, reducing build time and load on the build infrastructure.

  4. Continuous Integration (CI) Integration:

    GitHub: It provides integration with various CI tools like Travis CI, Jenkins, and CircleCI. Developers can easily set up automated build and testing processes using these CI tools.

    JitPack: It does not have built-in CI integration. Developers can integrate JitPack with their preferred CI tool by configuring the build process to include JitPack dependencies and use the JitPack REST API for triggering builds.

  5. Support for Other Languages:

    GitHub: It supports a wide range of programming languages, making it suitable for projects written in different languages like Java, Python, JavaScript, Ruby, etc.

    JitPack: It is primarily focused on Java libraries and does not officially support other programming languages. However, it may be possible to build non-Java projects using JitPack by manually configuring the build process.

In Summary, GitHub offers a more general-purpose platform with support for various programming languages, integration with popular CI tools, and a wide range of features. On the other hand, JitPack specializes in simplifying the dependency management and building of Java libraries hosted on GitHub, providing caching and versioning capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
JitPack
JitPack

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

JitPack is an easy to use package repository for Gradle/Sbt and Maven projects. We build GitHub projects on demand and provides ready-to-use packages.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
-
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
35
Followers
259.0K
Followers
74
Votes
10.4K
Votes
12
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1774
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 12
    Because uploading to maven central is a ball ache
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
SBT
SBT
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Gradle
Gradle
Android SDK
Android SDK

What are some alternatives to GitHub, JitPack?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Apache Maven

Apache Maven

Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.

Gradle

Gradle

Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Bazel

Bazel

Bazel is a build tool that builds code quickly and reliably. It is used to build the majority of Google's software, and thus it has been designed to handle build problems present in Google's development environment.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana