Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Google Cloud Source Repositories

Stacks91

Followers160

Votes0

GitLab vs Google Cloud Source Repositories: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitLab and Google Cloud Source Repositories are two popular version control systems used for managing source code. Both platforms offer similar functionalities but also have key differences that set them apart. In this document, we will explore the key differences between GitLab and Google Cloud Source Repositories.

Pricing Structure: GitLab offers a range of pricing options including a free version, self-managed, and cloud-hosted plans. Google Cloud Source Repositories, on the other hand, are primarily built for use within the Google Cloud Platform and are included as part of the overall pricing structure for other services. This means that access to Google Cloud Source Repositories may require a Google Cloud Platform subscription.
Integration with CI/CD: GitLab has robust features for continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD). It provides built-in CI/CD pipelines that can be easily configured to automate building, testing, and deploying applications. Google Cloud Source Repositories, although integrated with Google Cloud Build, may require additional setup and configuration for similar CI/CD workflows.
Collaboration Features: GitLab is known for its strong collaboration capabilities, offering features such as merge requests, inline code commenting, and code review workflows. Google Cloud Source Repositories, while offering basic collaboration functionalities, may not have the same level of advanced collaboration features as GitLab.
Access Control and Permissions: GitLab provides fine-grained access control and permissions settings, allowing users to define various roles and access levels for their repositories. Google Cloud Source Repositories have similar access control mechanisms but may have some limitations or differences in terms of permission granularity.
Community and Open Source: GitLab has a large and active open-source community, with many projects and features developed collaboratively. It also allows self-hosting, contributing to the open-source spirit. Google Cloud Source Repositories, being primarily a part of the Google Cloud Platform, may not have the same level of community involvement and self-hosting options.
Built-in DevOps Platform: GitLab provides an integrated platform for end-to-end DevOps processes, including version control, CI/CD, and container registry. It aims to be a one-stop solution for software development. Google Cloud Source Repositories, although integrated with other Google Cloud services, may not have the same level of built-in DevOps capabilities as GitLab.

In summary, GitLab offers a diverse and flexible pricing model, stronger collaboration features, better access control, and a more active open-source community. On the other hand, Google Cloud Source Repositories provide tighter integration with Google Cloud Platform services and a built-in ecosystem for Google Cloud users. The choice between the two would depend on specific requirements, preferences, and the existing infrastructure stack.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitLab, Google Cloud Source Repositories

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Google Cloud Source Repositories
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	Collaborate easily and securely manage your code on a fully featured, scalable, private Git repository. Extend your Git workflow by connecting to other GCP tools, including Cloud Build, App Engine, Stackdriver, and Cloud Pub/Sub. Get access to fast, indexed powerful code search across all your owned repositories to save time.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Unlimited private Git repositories;Deploy directly from Cloud Source Repositories;Automatically build and test your source code;Versioning and aliasing for serverless requests;Debug in production;Detailed audit logs;
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 91
Followers 54.5K	Followers 160
Votes 2.5K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Git GitHub Google App Engine Bitbucket Stackdriver Google Cloud Pub/Sub

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Google Cloud Source Repositories?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.