Alternatives to Tuleap logo

Alternatives to Tuleap

Jira, Redmine, GitLab, Taiga.io, and OpenProject are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Tuleap.
7
12
+ 1
0

What is Tuleap and what are its top alternatives?

Using the most efficient industry-leading software development approaches such as DevOps and Agile methods, Tuleap helps teams to make high quality and easier to manage software. With Tuleap, deliver value faster and better.
Tuleap is a tool in the Agile Project Management category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Tuleap

  • Jira

    Jira

    Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster. ...

  • Redmine

    Redmine

    Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using the Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database. ...

  • GitLab

    GitLab

    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers. ...

  • Taiga.io

    Taiga.io

    Taiga is a project management platform for startups and agile developers & designers who want a simple, beautiful tool that makes work truly enjoyable. Over 55,000 developers & designers and over 52,0000 projects in first 10 months. ...

  • OpenProject

    OpenProject

    It is an open source software for project management with a wide set of features and plugins and an active international community. ...

  • Phabricator

    Phabricator

    Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software. ...

  • Trello

    Trello

    Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process. ...

  • GitHub

    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

Tuleap alternatives & related posts

Jira logo

Jira

44.8K
34K
1.2K
The #1 software development tool used by agile teams to plan, track, and release great software.
44.8K
34K
+ 1
1.2K
PROS OF JIRA
  • 306
    Powerful
  • 253
    Flexible
  • 148
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
  • 57
    Easy to use
  • 51
    Run on your own
  • 38
    Great customization
  • 38
    Easy Workflow Configuration
  • 26
    REST API
  • 11
    Great Agile Management tool
  • 7
    Integrates with virtually everything
  • 6
    Confluence
  • 3
    Sentry Issues Integration
  • 2
    Complicated
CONS OF JIRA
  • 7
    Rather expensive
  • 4
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow

related Jira posts

Johnny Bell

So I am a huge fan of JIRA like #massive I used it for many many years, and really loved it, used it personally and at work. I would suggest every new workplace that I worked at to switch to JIRA instead of what I was using.

When I started at #StackShare we were using a Trello #Kanban board and I was so shocked at how easy the workflow was to follow, create new tasks and get tasks QA'd and deployed. What was so great about this was it didn't come with all the complexity of JIRA. Like setting up a project, user rules etc. You are able to hit the ground running with Trello and get tasks started right away without being overwhelmed with the complexity of options in JIRA

With a few TrelloPowerUps we were easily able to add GitHub integration and storyPoints to our cards and thats all we needed to get a really nice agile workflow going.

I'm not saying that JIRA is not useful, I can see larger companies being able to use the JIRA features and have the time to go through all the complex setup to get a really good workflow going. But for smaller #Startups that want to hit the ground running Trello for me is the way to go.

In saying that what I would love Trello to implement is to allow me to create custom fields. Right now we just have a Description field. So I am adding User Stories & How To Test in the Markdown of the Description if I could have these as custom fields then my #Agile workflow would be complete.

#StackDecisionsLaunch

See more
Jakub Olan
Node.js Software Engineer · | 17 upvotes · 187.4K views

Last time we shared there information about our decision about using YouTrack over Jira actually we found much better solution that our team have loved. Linear is a minimalistic issue tracker that integrates well with Sentry, GitHub, Slack and Figma which are our basic tools. I would like to recommend checking out Linear as a potential alternative to "heavy" issue trackers, maybe at enterprises that may not work but when we're a startup that works awesome!

See more
Redmine logo

Redmine

536
389
122
A flexible project management web application written using Ruby on Rails framework
536
389
+ 1
122
PROS OF REDMINE
  • 52
    Open source
  • 26
    Customizable with themes and plugins
  • 9
    Powerful custom queries
  • 8
    Integration with code version control like git/svn
  • 6
    RESTful API
  • 6
    Customizable workflows
  • 6
    Integration with email clients
  • 5
    Support for MS SQL Server
  • 1
    Self-hosted
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Projects and groups separation
  • 1
    Time tracking, reports
CONS OF REDMINE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Redmine posts

    We were using a hosted version of Redmine to track defects and user stories originally. We migrated to Jira.

    Jira was an easy decision for a number of reasons:

    • It's much more "Scrum ready" straight out of the box
    • It's so much easier to keep a track of progress (I love the reporting)
    • It natively encourages you to adhere to Scrum/Agile/Kanban practices
    • Atlassian has a fantastic DevOps ecosystem when considering the likes of Confluence and Bamboo etc
    • So many integrations!
    • Its UI is so intuitive which makes it an absolute pleasure to use!

    I know there are alot of other tools in this space but not even considering anything else at the moment. Love Jira!

    See more
    GitLab logo

    GitLab

    43.7K
    36.1K
    2.3K
    Open source self-hosted Git management software
    43.7K
    36.1K
    + 1
    2.3K
    PROS OF GITLAB
    • 491
      Self hosted
    • 420
      Free
    • 334
      Has community edition
    • 238
      Easy setup
    • 238
      Familiar interface
    • 131
      Includes many features, including ci
    • 107
      Nice UI
    • 81
      Good integration with gitlabci
    • 53
      Simple setup
    • 33
      Has an official mobile app
    • 31
      Free private repository
    • 26
      Continuous Integration
    • 19
      Open source, great ui (like github)
    • 15
      Slack Integration
    • 11
      Full CI flow
    • 9
      Free and unlimited private git repos
    • 8
      User, group, and project access management is simple
    • 7
      Built-in CI
    • 7
      All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
    • 7
      Intuitive UI
    • 4
      Both public and private Repositories
    • 3
      Mattermost Chat client
    • 3
      Integrated Docker Registry
    • 3
      Issue system
    • 2
      One-click install through DigitalOcean
    • 2
      Because is the best remote host for git repositories
    • 2
      Full DevOps suite with Git
    • 2
      Free private repos
    • 2
      Great for team collaboration
    • 2
      Unlimited free repos & collaborators
    • 2
      It's fully integrated
    • 2
      I like the its runners and executors feature
    • 2
      CI
    • 2
      So easy to use
    • 2
      Dockerized
    • 2
      It's powerful source code management tool
    • 2
      Excellent
    • 2
      Build/pipeline definition alongside code
    • 2
      Security and Stable
    • 2
      Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
    • 2
      On-premises
    • 1
      Multilingual interface
    • 1
      Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
    • 1
      Review Apps feature
    • 1
      Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
    • 1
      Groups of groups
    • 1
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 1
      Beautiful
    • 1
      Wounderful
    • 1
      Opensource
    • 1
      Not Microsoft Owned
    • 1
      Many private repo
    • 1
      Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
    • 1
      Native CI
    • 1
      HipChat intergration
    • 1
      Kubernetes Integration
    • 1
      The dashboard with deployed environments
    • 1
      Powerful Continuous Integration System
    • 1
      It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
    • 0
      Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits
    CONS OF GITLAB
    • 27
      Slow ui performance
    • 7
      Introduce breaking bugs every release
    • 5
      Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
    • 1
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 0
      Review Apps feature

    related GitLab posts

    Tim Abbott
    Shared insights
    on
    GitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab
    at

    I have mixed feelings on GitHub as a product and our use of it for the Zulip open source project. On the one hand, I do feel that being on GitHub helps people discover Zulip, because we have enough stars (etc.) that we rank highly among projects on the platform. and there is a definite benefit for lowering barriers to contribution (which is important to us) that GitHub has such a dominant position in terms of what everyone has accounts with.

    But even ignoring how one might feel about their new corporate owner (MicroSoft), in a lot of ways GitHub is a bad product for open source projects. Years after the "Dear GitHub" letter, there are still basic gaps in its issue tracker:

    • You can't give someone permission to label/categorize issues without full write access to a project (including ability to merge things to master, post releases, etc.).
    • You can't let anyone with a GitHub account self-assign issues to themselves.
    • Many more similar issues.

    It's embarrassing, because I've talked to GitHub product managers at various open source events about these things for 3 years, and they always agree the thing is important, but then nothing ever improves in the Issues product. Maybe the new management at MicroSoft will fix their product management situation, but if not, I imagine we'll eventually do the migration to GitLab.

    We have a custom bot project, http://github.com/zulip/zulipbot, to deal with some of these issues where possible, and every other large project we talk to does the same thing, more or less.

    See more
    Joshua Dean Küpper
    CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 18 upvotes · 306.7K views

    We use GitLab CI because of the great native integration as a part of the GitLab framework and the linting-capabilities it offers. The visualization of complex pipelines and the embedding within the project overview made Gitlab CI even more convenient. We use it for all projects, all deployments and as a part of GitLab Pages.

    While we initially used the Shell-executor, we quickly switched to the Docker-executor and use it exclusively now.

    We formerly used Jenkins but preferred to handle everything within GitLab . Aside from the unification of our infrastructure another motivation was the "configuration-in-file"-approach, that Gitlab CI offered, while Jenkins support of this concept was very limited and users had to resort to using the webinterface. Since the file is included within the repository, it is also version controlled, which was a huge plus for us.

    See more
    Taiga.io logo

    Taiga.io

    171
    184
    178
    Free. Open source Agile Project Management tool. Top 10 Open Source Projects of 2014 by Red Hat sponsored...
    171
    184
    + 1
    178
    PROS OF TAIGA.IO
    • 40
      Free. open source. agile project management
    • 23
      Elegant, beautiful
    • 22
      Has most of the common tools in jira, for free
    • 21
      Responsive, client-side based ui
    • 17
      Excellent burn down charts to track progress of sprints
    • 16
      Simple
    • 14
      Can be deployed by ourself
    • 9
      Fast Growing Community
    • 4
      Simple and very efficient for middle size project
    • 4
      Hipchat
    • 4
      Jira + Confluence killer
    • 3
      Slack
    • 1
      Best agile by far
    CONS OF TAIGA.IO
    • 0
      Bad performance
    • 0
      Bad ui

    related Taiga.io posts

    OpenProject logo

    OpenProject

    39
    63
    0
    Aa web-based project collaboration software
    39
    63
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF OPENPROJECT
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF OPENPROJECT
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OpenProject posts

        Phabricator logo

        Phabricator

        220
        299
        186
        Open Source, Software Development Platform
        220
        299
        + 1
        186
        PROS OF PHABRICATOR
        • 33
          Open Source
        • 29
          Code Review
        • 25
          Supports Git/Hg/SVN
        • 17
          Audit Source Code
        • 17
          Bug Tracking
        • 11
          Unlimited Repo Support
        • 10
          Software Engineering Platform
        • 10
          Super fast task creation
        • 9
          Flexible Project Management
        • 8
          Project Management
        • 5
          Self hosted
        • 4
          Building Better Software
        • 2
          Complete set for collaborating on software development
        • 2
          Best Integration with Gitlab
        • 1
          Straightforward code review process
        • 1
          Workflow
        • 1
          Very effective system, does all PM & code org needed
        • 1
          Powerful, Complete, Fast, Reliable and Open Source
        CONS OF PHABRICATOR
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Phabricator posts

          Trello logo

          Trello

          35.3K
          26.6K
          3.7K
          Your entire project, in a single glance
          35.3K
          26.6K
          + 1
          3.7K
          PROS OF TRELLO
          • 716
            Great for collaboration
          • 626
            Easy to use
          • 571
            Free
          • 375
            Fast
          • 347
            Realtime
          • 237
            Intuitive
          • 214
            Visualizing
          • 169
            Flexible
          • 126
            Fun user interface
          • 83
            Snappy and blazing fast
          • 30
            Simple, intuitive UI that gets out of your way
          • 26
            Kanban
          • 20
            Clean Interface
          • 18
            Easy setup
          • 18
            Card Structure
          • 17
            Drag and drop attachments
          • 11
            Simple
          • 10
            Markdown commentary on cards
          • 9
            Integration with other work collaborative apps
          • 9
            Lists
          • 8
            Satisfying User Experience
          • 8
            Cross-Platform Integration
          • 7
            Recognizes GitHub commit links
          • 6
            Easy to learn
          • 5
            Great
          • 4
            Versatile Team & Project Management
          • 4
            Better than email
          • 3
            Effective
          • 3
            Trello’s Developmental Transparency
          • 3
            and lots of integrations
          • 2
            Easy to have an overview of the project status
          • 2
            Agile
          • 2
            Powerful
          • 2
            flexible and fast
          • 2
            Easy
          • 2
            Simple and intuitive
          • 1
            Kanban style
          • 1
            Personal organisation
          • 1
            Customizable
          • 1
            Email integration
          • 1
            Great organizing (of events/tasks)
          • 1
            Name rolls of the tongue
          • 1
            Nice
          • 0
            Easiest way to visually express the scope of projects
          CONS OF TRELLO
          • 5
            No concept of velocity or points
          • 4
            Very light native integrations
          • 2
            A little too flexible

          related Trello posts

          Johnny Bell

          So I am a huge fan of JIRA like #massive I used it for many many years, and really loved it, used it personally and at work. I would suggest every new workplace that I worked at to switch to JIRA instead of what I was using.

          When I started at #StackShare we were using a Trello #Kanban board and I was so shocked at how easy the workflow was to follow, create new tasks and get tasks QA'd and deployed. What was so great about this was it didn't come with all the complexity of JIRA. Like setting up a project, user rules etc. You are able to hit the ground running with Trello and get tasks started right away without being overwhelmed with the complexity of options in JIRA

          With a few TrelloPowerUps we were easily able to add GitHub integration and storyPoints to our cards and thats all we needed to get a really nice agile workflow going.

          I'm not saying that JIRA is not useful, I can see larger companies being able to use the JIRA features and have the time to go through all the complex setup to get a really good workflow going. But for smaller #Startups that want to hit the ground running Trello for me is the way to go.

          In saying that what I would love Trello to implement is to allow me to create custom fields. Right now we just have a Description field. So I am adding User Stories & How To Test in the Markdown of the Description if I could have these as custom fields then my #Agile workflow would be complete.

          #StackDecisionsLaunch

          See more
          Francisco Quintero
          Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 809.8K views

          For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

          What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

          You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

          We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

          Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

          We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

          An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

          Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

          See more
          GitHub logo

          GitHub

          194.2K
          160.9K
          10.2K
          Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
          194.2K
          160.9K
          + 1
          10.2K
          PROS OF GITHUB
          • 1.8K
            Open source friendly
          • 1.5K
            Easy source control
          • 1.2K
            Nice UI
          • 1.1K
            Great for team collaboration
          • 861
            Easy setup
          • 502
            Issue tracker
          • 484
            Great community
          • 480
            Remote team collaboration
          • 448
            Great way to share
          • 441
            Pull request and features planning
          • 144
            Just works
          • 130
            Integrated in many tools
          • 117
            Free Public Repos
          • 112
            Github Gists
          • 108
            Github pages
          • 81
            Easy to find repos
          • 60
            Open source
          • 58
            Easy to find projects
          • 56
            Network effect
          • 56
            It's free
          • 48
            Extensive API
          • 42
            Organizations
          • 41
            Branching
          • 33
            Developer Profiles
          • 32
            Git Powered Wikis
          • 29
            Great for collaboration
          • 23
            It's fun
          • 22
            Community SDK involvement
          • 21
            Clean interface and good integrations
          • 19
            Learn from others source code
          • 14
            It integrates directly with Azure
          • 14
            Because: Git
          • 13
            Wide acceptance
          • 10
            Large community
          • 9
            Newsfeed
          • 9
            Standard in Open Source collab
          • 8
            It integrates directly with Hipchat
          • 7
            Beautiful user experience
          • 7
            Fast
          • 6
            Easy to discover new code libraries
          • 6
            Cloud SCM
          • 5
            Graphs
          • 5
            Smooth integration
          • 5
            Nice API
          • 5
            Integrations
          • 5
            It's awesome
          • 4
            Remarkable uptime
          • 4
            Hands down best online Git service available
          • 4
            Reliable
          • 3
            Easy to use and collaborate with others
          • 3
            CI Integration
          • 3
            Free HTML hosting
          • 3
            Loved by developers
          • 3
            Quick Onboarding
          • 3
            Security options
          • 3
            Simple but powerful
          • 3
            Uses GIT
          • 3
            Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
          • 3
            Version Control
          • 2
            Nice to use
          • 1
            Free private repos
          • 1
            Easy deployment via SSH
          • 1
            Beautiful
          • 1
            Owned by micrcosoft
          • 1
            Free HTML hostings
          • 1
            Self Hosted
          • 1
            All in one development service
          • 1
            Easy to use
          • 1
            Good tools support
          • 1
            Easy source control and everything is backed up
          • 1
            Leads the copycats
          • 1
            Never dethroned
          • 1
            Ci
          • 1
            Issues tracker
          • 1
            Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
          • 1
            IAM
          • 1
            IAM integration
          • 0
            Profound
          • 0
            1
          CONS OF GITHUB
          • 48
            Owned by micrcosoft
          • 37
            Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
          • 15
            Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
          • 10
            API scoping could be better
          • 8
            Only 3 collaborators for private repos
          • 3
            Limited featureset for issue management
          • 2
            GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
          • 1
            Have to use a token for the package registry
          • 1
            No multilingual interface
          • 1
            Takes a long time to commit

          related GitHub posts

          Johnny Bell

          I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

          I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

          I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

          Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

          Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

          With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

          If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 28 upvotes · 3.5M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more