Alternatives to Xcode logo

Alternatives to Xcode

Visual Studio, Swift, Cocoa (OS X), Android Studio, and Atom are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Xcode.
18.9K
14.3K
+ 1
213

What is Xcode and what are its top alternatives?

Xcode is a comprehensive integrated development environment (IDE) for macOS, used for developing software for iOS, iPadOS, macOS, watchOS, and tvOS. Its key features include a powerful source code editor, graphical interface designer, testing and debugging tools, and integration with version control systems like Git. However, Xcode is only available on macOS, which limits its use for developers on other operating systems like Windows and Linux.

  1. Visual Studio Code: Visual Studio Code is a free, open-source code editor developed by Microsoft, featuring a rich set of extensions, debugging support, and Git integration. Pros include its cross-platform availability and extensive community support, while cons may include a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  2. Android Studio: Android Studio is the official IDE for Android app development, offering advanced features like visual layout editors, APK analysis tools, and support for Kotlin programming language. Pros include seamless integration with the Android SDK, while cons may include a larger memory footprint compared to Xcode.
  3. Eclipse: Eclipse is a popular open-source IDE known for its extensibility through plugins, making it suitable for a wide range of programming languages and development tasks. Key features include a robust debugging interface and project management tools. Pros include its flexibility and versatility, while cons may include a slightly outdated user interface.
  4. IntelliJ IDEA: IntelliJ IDEA is a powerful IDE developed by JetBrains, offering advanced code assistance, intelligent coding assistance, and support for various languages and frameworks. Pros include its performance optimization and integration with other JetBrains tools, while cons may include the cost of the ultimate edition.
  5. NetBeans: NetBeans is a free, open-source IDE for Java development, featuring a modular architecture, project management tools, and support for multiple programming languages. Pros include its ease of use and extensive plugin ecosystem, while cons may include occasional performance issues on larger projects.
  6. WebStorm: WebStorm is a JavaScript IDE developed by JetBrains, offering intelligent coding assistance, debugging tools, and integration with popular JavaScript frameworks. Pros include its advanced web development features, while cons may include the price for a commercial license.
  7. Sublime Text: Sublime Text is a lightweight code editor known for its speed, code-focused editing, and customizable interface through plugins and themes. Pros include its performance and extensive plugin ecosystem, while cons may include the lack of built-in collaboration tools.
  8. Atom: Atom is a free, open-source text editor developed by GitHub, featuring a modular design, smart autocompletion, and a vibrant community creating packages and themes. Pros include its flexibility and customizable interface, while cons may include occasional performance issues on larger projects.
  9. Komodo IDE: Komodo IDE is a professional IDE supporting multiple languages, offering code intelligence, debugging tools, and version control integration. Pros include its language support and debugging capabilities, while cons may include a higher price compared to other IDEs.
  10. CLion: CLion is an intelligent cross-platform IDE for C and C++ development, featuring smart code completion, refactorings, and seamless integration with CMake build system. Pros include its performance optimization for C/C++ projects, while cons may include the cost of a commercial license.

Top Alternatives to Xcode

  • Visual Studio
    Visual Studio

    Visual Studio is a suite of component-based software development tools and other technologies for building powerful, high-performance applications. ...

  • Swift
    Swift

    Writing code is interactive and fun, the syntax is concise yet expressive, and apps run lightning-fast. Swift is ready for your next iOS and OS X project — or for addition into your current app — because Swift code works side-by-side with Objective-C. ...

  • Cocoa (OS X)
    Cocoa (OS X)

    Much of Cocoa is implemented in Objective-C, an object-oriented language that is compiled to run at incredible speed, yet employs a truly dynamic runtime making it uniquely flexible. Because Objective-C is a superset of C, it is easy to mix C and even C++ into your Cocoa applications. ...

  • Android Studio
    Android Studio

    Android Studio is a new Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA. It provides new features and improvements over Eclipse ADT and will be the official Android IDE once it's ready. ...

  • Atom
    Atom

    At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it. ...

  • Eclipse
    Eclipse

    Standard Eclipse package suited for Java and plug-in development plus adding new plugins; already includes Git, Marketplace Client, source code and developer documentation. Click here to file a bug against Eclipse Platform. ...

  • IntelliJ IDEA
    IntelliJ IDEA

    Out of the box, IntelliJ IDEA provides a comprehensive feature set including tools and integrations with the most important modern technologies and frameworks for enterprise and web development with Java, Scala, Groovy and other languages. ...

  • AppCode
    AppCode

    It is an integrated development environment for Swift, Objective-C, C, C++, and JavaScript development built on JetBrains’ IntelliJ IDEA platform. It takes care of your routine tasks and saves you from extra typing. ...

Xcode alternatives & related posts

Visual Studio logo

Visual Studio

47.5K
36.9K
1.1K
State-of-the-art tools and services that you can use to create great apps for devices, the cloud, and everything...
47.5K
36.9K
+ 1
1.1K
PROS OF VISUAL STUDIO
  • 305
    Intellisense, ui
  • 244
    Complete ide and debugger
  • 165
    Plug-ins
  • 104
    Integrated
  • 93
    Documentation
  • 37
    Fast
  • 35
    Node tools for visual studio (ntvs)
  • 33
    Free Community edition
  • 24
    Simple
  • 17
    Bug free
  • 8
    Made by Microsoft
  • 6
    Full free community version
  • 5
    JetBrains plugins (ReSharper etc.) work sufficiently OK
  • 3
    Productivity Power Tools
  • 2
    Vim mode
  • 2
    VIM integration
  • 1
    I develop UWP apps and Intellisense is super useful
  • 1
    Cross platform development
  • 1
    The Power and Easiness to Do anything in any.. language
  • 1
    Available for Mac and Windows
CONS OF VISUAL STUDIO
  • 15
    Bulky
  • 14
    Made by Microsoft
  • 6
    Sometimes you need to restart to finish an update
  • 3
    Too much size for disk
  • 3
    Only avalible on Windows

related Visual Studio posts

Shared insights
on
C#C#JavaJavaVisual StudioVisual Studio

I use C# because of the ease of designing user interfaces compared to Java. Using Visual Studio makes C# a breeze for prototyping and creating apps and I really appreciate how quickly I can turn an idea into reality. I was first introduced to C# in a special topics course and quickly started preferring it over Java. The similarities between the two made the switch easy while the added benefits C# offers made it very worth it.

See more
Andrey Kurdyumov

I use TypeScript because it greatly simplify my refactoring efforts. I regularly re-validate my assumption about application architecture, and strictness of types allow me write make changes safely using just Visual Studio tooling. Integration with existing JavaScript libraries very simple and fast. If I have no time, I could just use any type as output of JS module. When I have more time, I could just submit PR to DefinitelyTyped and it would be quickly accepted. Overall it gives less ambiguity for my code.

See more
Swift logo

Swift

19.9K
13.2K
1.3K
An innovative new programming language for Cocoa and Cocoa Touch.
19.9K
13.2K
+ 1
1.3K
PROS OF SWIFT
  • 259
    Ios
  • 180
    Elegant
  • 126
    Not Objective-C
  • 107
    Backed by apple
  • 93
    Type inference
  • 61
    Generics
  • 54
    Playgrounds
  • 49
    Semicolon free
  • 38
    OSX
  • 36
    Tuples offer compound variables
  • 24
    Clean Syntax
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 22
    Open Source
  • 21
    Beautiful Code
  • 20
    Functional
  • 12
    Dynamic
  • 12
    Linux
  • 11
    Protocol-oriented programming
  • 10
    Promotes safe, readable code
  • 9
    No S-l-o-w JVM
  • 8
    Explicit optionals
  • 7
    Storyboard designer
  • 6
    Optionals
  • 6
    Type safety
  • 5
    Super addicting language, great people, open, elegant
  • 5
    Best UI concept
  • 4
    Its friendly
  • 4
    Highly Readable codes
  • 4
    Fail-safe
  • 4
    Powerful
  • 4
    Faster and looks better
  • 4
    Swift is faster than Objective-C
  • 4
    Feels like a better C++
  • 3
    Easy to learn and work
  • 3
    Much more fun
  • 3
    Protocol extensions
  • 3
    Native
  • 3
    Its fun and damn fast
  • 3
    Strong Type safety
  • 3
    Easy to Maintain
  • 2
    Protocol as type
  • 2
    All Cons C# and Java Swift Already has
  • 2
    Esay
  • 2
    MacOS
  • 2
    Type Safe
  • 2
    Protocol oriented programming
  • 1
    Can interface with C easily
  • 1
    Actually don't have to own a mac
  • 1
    Free from Memory Leak
  • 1
    Swift is easier to understand for non-iOS developers.
  • 1
    Numbers with underbar
  • 1
    Optional chain
  • 1
    Great for Multi-Threaded Programming
  • 1
    Runs Python 8 times faster
  • 1
    Objec
CONS OF SWIFT
  • 5
    Must own a mac
  • 2
    Memory leaks are not uncommon
  • 1
    Very irritatingly picky about things that’s
  • 1
    Complicated process for exporting modules
  • 1
    Its classes compile to roughly 300 lines of assembly
  • 1
    Is a lot more effort than lua to make simple functions
  • 0
    Overly complex options makes it easy to create bad code

related Swift posts

Shivam Bhargava
AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd. · | 22 upvotes · 779.9K views

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 13 upvotes · 1.6M views

Excerpts from how we developed (and subsequently open sourced) Uber's cross-platform mobile architecture framework, RIBs , going from Objective-C to Swift in the process for iOS: https://github.com/uber/RIBs

Uber’s new application architecture (RIBs) extensively uses protocols to keep its various components decoupled and testable. We used this architecture for the first time in our new rider application and moved our primary language from Objective-C to Swift. Since Swift is a very static language, unit testing became problematic. Dynamic languages have good frameworks to build test mocks, stubs, or stand-ins by dynamically creating or modifying existing concrete classes.

Needless to say, we were not very excited about the additional complexity of manually writing and maintaining mock implementations for each of our thousands of protocols.

The information required to generate mock classes already exists in the Swift protocol. For Uber’s use case, we set out to create tooling that would let engineers automatically generate test mocks for any protocol they wanted by simply annotating them.

The iOS codebase for our rider application alone incorporates around 1,500 of these generated mocks. Without our code generation tool, all of these would have to be written and maintained by hand, which would have made testing much more time-intensive. Auto-generated mocks have contributed a lot to the unit test coverage that we have today.

We built these code generation tools ourselves for a number of reasons, including that there weren’t many open source tools available at the time we started our effort. Today, there are some great open source tools to generate resource accessors, like SwiftGen. And Sourcery can help you with generic code generation needs:

https://eng.uber.com/code-generation/ https://eng.uber.com/driver-app-ribs-architecture/

(GitHub : https://github.com/uber/RIBs )

See more
Cocoa (OS X) logo

Cocoa (OS X)

37
52
6
The Cocoa frameworks consist of libraries, APIs, and runtimes that form the development layer for all of OS...
37
52
+ 1
6
PROS OF COCOA (OS X)
  • 3
    Great community
  • 2
    IOS
  • 1
    Backed by apple
CONS OF COCOA (OS X)
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Cocoa (OS X) posts

    Android Studio logo

    Android Studio

    24.9K
    19.8K
    361
    Android development environment based on IntelliJ IDEA
    24.9K
    19.8K
    + 1
    361
    PROS OF ANDROID STUDIO
    • 176
      Android studio is a great tool, getting better and bet
    • 103
      Google's official android ide
    • 37
      Intelligent code editor with lots of auto-completion
    • 25
      Its powerful and robust
    • 5
      Easy creating android app
    • 3
      Amazing Layout Designer
    • 3
      Great Code Tips
    • 3
      Great tool & very helpful
    • 2
      Easy to use
    • 2
      Built in Emulator
    • 2
      Keyboard Shortcuts are Amazing Out of the box
    CONS OF ANDROID STUDIO
    • 4
      Slow emulator
    • 4
      Huge memory usage
    • 2
      Using Intellij IDEA, while Intellij IDEA have too
    • 2
      Complex for begginers
    • 2
      No checking incompatibilities
    • 1
      Lags behind IntelliJ IDEA
    • 1
      Slow release process

    related Android Studio posts

    Gustavo Muñoz
    Senior Software Engineer at JOOR · | 8 upvotes · 443.8K views

    In my modest opinion, Flutter is the future of mobile development. The framework is as important to mobile as React is to the web. And seeing that React Native does not finish taking off, I am focusing all my efforts on learning Flutter and Dart. The ecosystem is amazing. The community is crazy about Flutter. There are enough resources to learn and enjoy the framework, and the tools developed to work with it are amazing. Android Studio or Visual Studio Code has incredible plugins and Dart is a pretty straight forward and easy-to-learn language, even more, if you came from JavaScript. I admit it. I'm in love with Flutter. When you are not a designer, having a framework focused on design an pretty things is a must. And counting with tools like #flare for animations makes everything easier. It is so amazing that I wish I had a big mobile project right now at work just to use Flutter.

    See more
    Julien DeFrance
    Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 8 upvotes · 442.5K views

    As a Engineering Manager & Director at SmartZip, I had a mix of front-end, back-end, #mobile engineers reporting to me.

    Sprints after sprints, I noticed some inefficiencies on the MobileDev side. People working multiple sprints in a row on their Xcode / Objective-C codebase while some others were working on Android Studio. After which, QA & Product ensured both applications were in sync, on a UI/UX standpoint, creating addional work, which also happened to be extremely costly.

    Our resources being so limited, my role was to stop this bleeding and keep my team productive and their time, valuable.

    After some analysis, discussions, proof of concepts... etc. We decided to move to a single codebase using React Native so our velocity would increase.

    After some initial investment, our initial assumptions were confirmed and we indeed started to ship features a lot faster than ever before. Also, our engineers found a way to perform this upgrade incrementally, so the initial platform-specific codebase wouldn't have to entirely be rewritten at once but only gradually and at will.

    Feedback around React Native was very positive. And I doubt - for the kind of application we had - no one would want to go back to two or more code bases. Our application was still as Native as it gets. And no feature or device capability was compromised.

    See more
    Atom logo

    Atom

    16.8K
    14.4K
    2.5K
    A hackable text editor for the 21st Century
    16.8K
    14.4K
    + 1
    2.5K
    PROS OF ATOM
    • 529
      Free
    • 449
      Open source
    • 343
      Modular design
    • 321
      Hackable
    • 316
      Beautiful UI
    • 147
      Backed by github
    • 119
      Built with node.js
    • 113
      Web native
    • 107
      Community
    • 35
      Packages
    • 18
      Cross platform
    • 5
      Nice UI
    • 5
      Multicursor support
    • 5
      TypeScript editor
    • 3
      Open source, lots of packages, and so configurable
    • 3
      cli start
    • 3
      Simple but powerful
    • 3
      Chrome Inspector works IN EDITOR
    • 3
      Snippets
    • 2
      Code readability
    • 2
      It's powerful
    • 2
      Awesome
    • 2
      Smart TypeScript code completion
    • 2
      Well documented
    • 1
      works with GitLab
    • 1
      "Free", "Hackable", "Open Source", The Awesomness
    • 1
      full support
    • 1
      vim support
    • 1
      Split-Tab Layout
    • 1
      Apm publish minor
    • 1
      Consistent UI on all platforms
    • 1
      User friendly
    • 1
      Hackable and Open Source
    • 0
      Publish
    CONS OF ATOM
    • 19
      Slow with large files
    • 7
      Slow startup
    • 2
      Most of the time packages are hard to find.
    • 1
      No longer maintained
    • 1
      Cannot Run code with F5
    • 1
      Can be easily Modified

    related Atom posts

    Jerome Dalbert
    Principal Backend Software Engineer at StackShare · | 13 upvotes · 917.2K views

    I liked Sublime Text for its speed, simplicity and keyboard shortcuts which synergize well when working on scripting languages like Ruby and JavaScript. I extended the editor with custom Python scripts that improved keyboard navigability such as autofocusing the sidebar when no files are open, or changing tab closing behavior.

    But customization can only get you so far, and there were little things that I still had to use the mouse for, such as scrolling, repositioning lines on the screen, selecting the line number of a failing test stack trace from a separate plugin pane, etc. After 3 years of wearily moving my arm and hand to perform the same repetitive tasks, I decided to switch to Vim for 3 reasons:

    • your fingers literally don’t ever need to leave the keyboard home row (I had to remap the escape key though)
    • it is a reliable tool that has been around for more than 30 years and will still be around for the next 30 years
    • I wanted to "look like a hacker" by doing everything inside my terminal and by becoming a better Unix citizen

    The learning curve is very steep and it took me a year to master it, but investing time to be truly comfortable with my #TextEditor was more than worth it. To me, Vim comes close to being the perfect editor and I probably won’t need to switch ever again. It feels good to ignore new editors that come out every few years, like Atom and Visual Studio Code.

    See more
    Julian Sanchez
    Lead Developer at Chore Champion · | 9 upvotes · 771.5K views

    We use Visual Studio Code because it allows us to easily and quickly integrate with Git, much like Sublime Merge ,but it is integrated into the IDE. Another cool part about VS Code is the ability collaborate with each other with Visual Studio Live Share which allows our whole team to get more done together. It brings the convenience of the Google Suite to programming, offering something that works more smoothly than anything found on Atom or Sublime Text

    See more
    Eclipse logo

    Eclipse

    2.6K
    2.2K
    392
    IDE for Java EE Developers
    2.6K
    2.2K
    + 1
    392
    PROS OF ECLIPSE
    • 131
      Does it all
    • 76
      Integrates with most of tools
    • 64
      Easy to use
    • 63
      Java IDE
    • 32
      Best Java IDE
    • 9
      Open source
    • 3
      Hard for newbews
    • 2
      Great gdb integration
    • 2
      Professional
    • 2
      Good Git client allowing direct stage area edit
    • 2
      True open source with huge contribution
    • 2
      Great code suggestions
    • 2
      Extensible
    • 2
      Lightweight
    • 0
      Works with php
    CONS OF ECLIPSE
    • 14
      2000 Design
    • 9
      Bad performance
    • 4
      Hard to use

    related Eclipse posts

    christy craemer

    UPDATE: Thanks for the great response. I am going to start with VSCode based on the open source and free version that will allow me to grow into other languages, but not cost me a license ..yet.

    I have been working with software development for 12 years, but I am just beginning my journey to learn to code. I am starting with Python following the suggestion of some of my coworkers. They are split between Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for IDEs that they use and PyCharm is new to me. Which IDE would you suggest for a beginner that will allow expansion to Java, JavaScript, and eventually AngularJS and possibly mobile applications?

    See more
    Dean Stringer

    Have been a Visual Studio Code user since just after launch to the general public, having used the likes of Eclipse and Atom previously. Was amazed how mature it seemed off the bat and was super intrigued by the bootstrapped nature of it having been written/based on Electron/TypeScript, and of course being an open-source app from Microsoft. The features, plugin ecosystem and release frequency are very impressive. I do dev work on both Mac and Windows and don't use anything else now as far as IDEs go.

    See more
    IntelliJ IDEA logo

    IntelliJ IDEA

    42.7K
    35.8K
    1.5K
    Capable and Ergonomic IDE for JVM
    42.7K
    35.8K
    + 1
    1.5K
    PROS OF INTELLIJ IDEA
    • 301
      Fantastically intelligent
    • 242
      Best-in-class ide
    • 190
      Many languages support
    • 158
      Java
    • 121
      Fast
    • 82
      Code analysis
    • 79
      Reliable
    • 76
      Out of the box integration with maven, git, svn
    • 64
      Plugin architecture
    • 61
      Integrated version control
    • 12
      Code refactoring support
    • 11
      Best java IDE
    • 7
      Local history
    • 6
      Code Completion
    • 6
      Kotlin
    • 6
      Integrated Database Navigator
    • 6
      Built-in terminal/run tools
    • 5
      All
    • 5
      Free for open-source development, students and teacher
    • 5
      Base for Android Studio
    • 5
      Free If you're a Student
    • 4
      ERD Diagrams
    • 4
      Free
    • 4
      Cross platform
    • 4
      IDE
    • 4
      Database/Code integration
    • 3
      Out Of The Box features
    • 3
      Column Selection Mode
    • 3
      Server and client-side debugger
    • 3
      More than enough languages for any developer
    • 3
      Typescript support
    • 3
      Multicursor support
    • 3
      Reformating Code
    • 3
      Intuitive
    • 3
      Command-line tools
    • 3
      Android Integration
    • 3
      Vim support
    • 3
      Special icons for most filetypes in project list
    • 3
      Supports many frameworks
    • 3
      Built-in web server
    • 3
      Live Templates
    • 3
      Scala support
    • 2
      Works fine with mac os catalina
    • 2
      A lot of plugin
    • 2
      Just works
    • 2
      Integrated Ssh/Ftp Managers
    • 2
      Full support
    • 2
      Task managers
    • 2
      Diff tools
    • 2
      File Watchers
    • 2
      Support for various package managers
    • 2
      Integrated Code Linting
    • 2
      Clean UI
    • 2
      Open source
    • 2
      So modernised
    • 2
      Efficient, one Stop solution
    CONS OF INTELLIJ IDEA
    • 20
      Large footprint required to really enjoy (mem/disc)
    • 16
      Very slow
    • 8
      Bad for beginners
    • 7
      UI is not intuitive
    • 5
      Not nearly as many tools to integrate as vs code
    • 5
      Constant reindexing
    • 4
      Needs a lot of CPU and RAM power
    • 3
      Built in terminal is slow
    • 3
      Doesn't work that well with windows 10 edu
    • 1
      Ruby is a plug in
    • 1
      Pesky warnings increase with every release
    • 0
      AAD

    related IntelliJ IDEA posts

    christy craemer

    UPDATE: Thanks for the great response. I am going to start with VSCode based on the open source and free version that will allow me to grow into other languages, but not cost me a license ..yet.

    I have been working with software development for 12 years, but I am just beginning my journey to learn to code. I am starting with Python following the suggestion of some of my coworkers. They are split between Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for IDEs that they use and PyCharm is new to me. Which IDE would you suggest for a beginner that will allow expansion to Java, JavaScript, and eventually AngularJS and possibly mobile applications?

    See more

    I am a QA heading to a new company where they all generally use Visual Studio Code, my experience is with IntelliJ IDEA and PyCharm. The language they use is JavaScript and so I will be writing my test framework in javaScript so the devs can more easily write tests without context switching.

    My 2 questions: Does VS Code have Cucumber Plugins allowing me to write behave tests? And more importantly, does VS Code have the same refactoring tools that IntelliJ IDEA has? I love that I have easy access to a range of tools that allow me to refactor and simplify my code, making code writing really easy.

    See more
    AppCode logo

    AppCode

    54
    54
    6
    IDE for iOS/macOS development
    54
    54
    + 1
    6
    PROS OF APPCODE
    • 2
      Better typing
    • 2
      Awesome refactoring support
    • 2
      Powerful search and replace
    CONS OF APPCODE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related AppCode posts