Alternatives to AWS Elemental MediaConvert logo

Alternatives to AWS Elemental MediaConvert

Amazon Elastic Transcoder, Google Drive, CloudFlare, Dropbox, and Amazon CloudFront are the most popular alternatives and competitors to AWS Elemental MediaConvert.
42
0

What is AWS Elemental MediaConvert and what are its top alternatives?

AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a cloud-based video transcoding service that offers high-quality, on-demand video processing with full scalability. It supports a wide range of input and output formats, codecs, and features like audio normalization, captioning, and ad insertion. However, some limitations include the lack of a free tier and potential costs associated with data transfer and storage.

  1. Zencoder: Zencoder is a powerful cloud-based video encoding service that supports various input and output formats, scalable infrastructure, and adaptive bitrate streaming. Pros include reliable performance and efficient transcoding, but cons may include pricing that might be higher than some alternatives.
  2. Telestream Vantage: Telestream Vantage provides efficient video transcoding, workflow automation, and advanced video processing capabilities. Key features include support for a wide range of formats, advanced workflow customization, and robust media analysis tools. Pros include comprehensive features and flexibility, while cons may include a steeper learning curve.
  3. FFmpeg: FFmpeg is a popular open-source multimedia framework that can be used for video encoding, decoding, streaming, and more. It offers a wide range of codec support, filters, and customization options. Pros include its flexibility and cost-effectiveness, but cons may include a more complex setup and configuration.
  4. Encoding.com: Encoding.com is a cloud-based video encoding service that offers high-quality transcoding, fast processing speeds, adaptive bitrate streaming, and support for various devices. Pros include a user-friendly interface and scalability, while cons may include pricing considerations for high-volume usage.
  5. Bitmovin: Bitmovin provides a cloud-based transcoding solution with advanced video encoding capabilities, scalable infrastructure, and support for formats like HEVC and HDR. Key features include adaptive streaming, machine learning optimization, and low latency streaming. Pros include high-quality output and comprehensive features, but cons may include potential costs for additional services.
  6. Harmonic VOS 360: Harmonic VOS 360 offers cloud-native video processing and delivery with features like transcoding, packaging, origin services, and content delivery optimization. Pros include scalability and efficient processing, while cons may include complexity for smaller-scale operations.
  7. Azure Media Services: Azure Media Services by Microsoft provides a suite of cloud-based media processing services, including encoding, streaming, content protection, and analytics. Key features include compatibility with Azure infrastructure, live streaming support, and advanced media workflows. Pros include integration with other Microsoft services, but cons may include potential complexity for non-Azure users.
  8. Google Cloud Video Transcoder: Google Cloud Video Transcoder offers scalable video processing with features like encoding, packaging, and delivery optimization. It supports a wide range of formats, codecs, and adaptive streaming protocols. Pros include seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform, but cons may include pricing considerations depending on usage levels.
  9. Mux Video: Mux Video provides a developer-friendly platform for video encoding, streaming, and delivery with features like adaptive bitrate streaming, real-time monitoring, and performance analytics. Pros include ease of use and developer tools, while cons may include potential costs for additional services beyond basic encoding.
  10. Vidispine Transcoder: Vidispine Transcoder offers efficient video transcoding capabilities with support for various formats, codecs, and automation features. Key features include cloud-based transcoding, batch processing, and workflow customization. Pros include flexibility and scalability, but cons may include potential setup and configuration complexity.

Top Alternatives to AWS Elemental MediaConvert

  • Amazon Elastic Transcoder
    Amazon Elastic Transcoder

    Convert or transcode media files from their source format into versions that will playback on devices like smartphones, tablets and PCs. Create a transcoding “job” specifying the location of your source media file and how you want it transcoded. Amazon Elastic Transcoder also provides transcoding presets for popular output formats. All these features are available via service API, AWS SDKs and the AWS Management Console. ...

  • Google Drive
    Google Drive

    Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer. ...

  • CloudFlare
    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Dropbox
    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • Amazon CloudFront
    Amazon CloudFront

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. ...

  • Akamai
    Akamai

    If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward. ...

  • MaxCDN
    MaxCDN

    The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them. ...

  • Incapsula
    Incapsula

    Through an application-aware, global content delivery network (CDN), Incapsula provides any website and web application with best-of-breed security, DDoS protection, load balancing and failover solutions. ...

AWS Elemental MediaConvert alternatives & related posts

Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo

Amazon Elastic Transcoder

90
114
0
Media transcoding in the cloud using Amazon EC2
90
114
+ 1
0
PROS OF AMAZON ELASTIC TRANSCODER
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF AMAZON ELASTIC TRANSCODER
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Amazon Elastic Transcoder posts

      Alex Wendland

      We were looking for a versatile #MediaTranscoding service for #video to convert TV shows and movies from large content providers into web #VideoStreaming formats. These content providers gave us files ranging from Apple ProRes to h.264, with file sizes from 1 GB to 100 GB, and we needed a tool that could cope with all of it. We looked at Amazon Elastic Transcoder and Zencoder, and eventually chose @Zencoder because it had support for every format we needed, good handling of sound channel remapping, and a clear UI with fast processing times. We automated our usage with it by writing a simple Python script to interact with it's API, and hosted the input and output AV files on Amazon S3, which it could easily talk to. So far we've converted 15 TB representing several thousand files using the service and are quite happy!

      See more
      Google Drive logo

      Google Drive

      81.8K
      68K
      2.1K
      A safe place for all your files
      81.8K
      68K
      + 1
      2.1K
      PROS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
      • 505
        Easy to use
      • 326
        Gmail integration
      • 312
        Enough free space
      • 268
        Collaboration
      • 249
        Stable service
      • 128
        Desktop and mobile apps
      • 97
        Offline sync
      • 79
        Apps
      • 74
        15 gb storage
      • 50
        Add-ons
      • 9
        Integrates well
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 3
        Simple back-up tool
      • 2
        Amazing
      • 2
        Beautiful
      • 2
        Fast upload speeds
      • 2
        The more the merrier
      • 2
        So easy
      • 2
        Wonderful
      • 2
        Linux terminal transfer tools
      • 2
        It has grown to a stable in the cloud office
      • 1
        UI
      • 1
        Windows desktop
      • 1
        G Suite integration
      CONS OF GOOGLE DRIVE
      • 7
        Organization via web ui sucks
      • 2
        Not a real database

      related Google Drive posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

      I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

      Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

      See more
      CloudFlare logo

      CloudFlare

      76.5K
      22.5K
      1.8K
      The Web Performance & Security Company.
      76.5K
      22.5K
      + 1
      1.8K
      PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 424
        Easy setup, great cdn
      • 277
        Free ssl
      • 199
        Easy setup
      • 190
        Security
      • 180
        Ssl
      • 98
        Great cdn
      • 77
        Optimizer
      • 71
        Simple
      • 44
        Great UI
      • 28
        Great js cdn
      • 12
        Apps
      • 12
        HTTP/2 Support
      • 12
        DNS Analytics
      • 12
        AutoMinify
      • 9
        Rocket Loader
      • 9
        Ipv6
      • 9
        Easy
      • 8
        IPv6 "One Click"
      • 8
        Fantastic CDN service
      • 7
        DNSSEC
      • 7
        Nice DNS
      • 7
        SSHFP
      • 7
        Free GeoIP
      • 7
        Amazing performance
      • 7
        API
      • 7
        Cheapest SSL
      • 6
        SPDY
      • 6
        Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
      • 5
        Ubuntu
      • 5
        Asynchronous resource loading
      • 4
        Global Load Balancing
      • 4
        Performance
      • 4
        Easy Use
      • 3
        CDN
      • 2
        Registrar
      • 2
        Support for SSHFP records
      • 1
        Web3
      • 1
        Прохси
      • 1
        HTTPS3/Quic
      CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 2
        No support for SSHFP records
      • 2
        Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits

      related CloudFlare posts

      Tom Klein

      Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

      See more
      Johnny Bell

      When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

      One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

      Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 🤙🏻.

      When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

      I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

      See more
      Dropbox logo

      Dropbox

      23.3K
      18.2K
      1.7K
      Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
      23.3K
      18.2K
      + 1
      1.7K
      PROS OF DROPBOX
      • 434
        Easy to work with
      • 256
        Free
      • 216
        Popular
      • 176
        Shared file hosting
      • 167
        'just works'
      • 100
        No brainer
      • 79
        Integration with external services
      • 76
        Simple
      • 49
        Good api
      • 38
        Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
      • 11
        It just works
      • 8
        Convenient
      • 7
        Accessible from all of my devices
      • 5
        Command Line client
      • 4
        Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
      • 4
        Can even be used by your grandma
      • 3
        Reliable
      • 3
        Sync API
      • 3
        Mac app
      • 3
        Cross platform app
      • 2
        Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
      • 2
        Delta synchronization
      • 2
        Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
      • 2
        Backups, local and cloud
      • 2
        Extended version history
      • 2
        Beautiful UI
      • 1
        YC Company
      • 1
        What a beautiful app
      • 1
        Easy/no setup
      • 1
        So easy
      • 1
        The more the merrier
      • 1
        Easy to work with
      • 1
        For when client needs file without opening firewall
      • 1
        Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
      • 1
        Easy to use
      • 1
        Official Linux app
      • 0
        The more the merrier
      CONS OF DROPBOX
      • 3
        Personal vs company account is confusing
      • 1
        Replication kills CPU and battery

      related Dropbox posts

      Shared insights
      on
      Google DriveGoogle DriveDropboxDropbox

      I created a simple upload/download functionality for a web application and connected it to Mongo, now I can upload, store and download files. I need advice on how to create a SPA similar to Dropbox or Google Drive in that it will be a hierarchy of folders with files within them, how would I go about creating this structure and adding this functionality to all the files within the application?

      Intuitively creating a react component and adding it to a File object seems like the way to go, what are some issues to expect and how do I go about creating such an application to be as fast and UI-friendly as possible?

      See more
      Shared insights
      on
      BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

      Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

      See more
      Amazon CloudFront logo

      Amazon CloudFront

      21.3K
      10.7K
      935
      Content delivery with low latency and high data transfer speeds
      21.3K
      10.7K
      + 1
      935
      PROS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
      • 245
        Fast
      • 166
        Cdn
      • 157
        Compatible with other aws services
      • 125
        Simple
      • 108
        Global
      • 41
        Cheap
      • 36
        Cost-effective
      • 27
        Reliable
      • 19
        One stop solution
      • 9
        Elastic
      • 1
        Object store
      • 1
        HTTP/2 Support
      CONS OF AMAZON CLOUDFRONT
      • 3
        UI could use some work
      • 1
        Invalidations take so long

      related Amazon CloudFront posts

      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.8M views

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more
      Julien DeFrance
      Principal Software Engineer at Tophatter · | 16 upvotes · 3.2M views

      Back in 2014, I was given an opportunity to re-architect SmartZip Analytics platform, and flagship product: SmartTargeting. This is a SaaS software helping real estate professionals keeping up with their prospects and leads in a given neighborhood/territory, finding out (thanks to predictive analytics) who's the most likely to list/sell their home, and running cross-channel marketing automation against them: direct mail, online ads, email... The company also does provide Data APIs to Enterprise customers.

      I had inherited years and years of technical debt and I knew things had to change radically. The first enabler to this was to make use of the cloud and go with AWS, so we would stop re-inventing the wheel, and build around managed/scalable services.

      For the SaaS product, we kept on working with Rails as this was what my team had the most knowledge in. We've however broken up the monolith and decoupled the front-end application from the backend thanks to the use of Rails API so we'd get independently scalable micro-services from now on.

      Our various applications could now be deployed using AWS Elastic Beanstalk so we wouldn't waste any more efforts writing time-consuming Capistrano deployment scripts for instance. Combined with Docker so our application would run within its own container, independently from the underlying host configuration.

      Storage-wise, we went with Amazon S3 and ditched any pre-existing local or network storage people used to deal with in our legacy systems. On the database side: Amazon RDS / MySQL initially. Ultimately migrated to Amazon RDS for Aurora / MySQL when it got released. Once again, here you need a managed service your cloud provider handles for you.

      Future improvements / technology decisions included:

      Caching: Amazon ElastiCache / Memcached CDN: Amazon CloudFront Systems Integration: Segment / Zapier Data-warehousing: Amazon Redshift BI: Amazon Quicksight / Superset Search: Elasticsearch / Amazon Elasticsearch Service / Algolia Monitoring: New Relic

      As our usage grows, patterns changed, and/or our business needs evolved, my role as Engineering Manager then Director of Engineering was also to ensure my team kept on learning and innovating, while delivering on business value.

      One of these innovations was to get ourselves into Serverless : Adopting AWS Lambda was a big step forward. At the time, only available for Node.js (Not Ruby ) but a great way to handle cost efficiency, unpredictable traffic, sudden bursts of traffic... Ultimately you want the whole chain of services involved in a call to be serverless, and that's when we've started leveraging Amazon DynamoDB on these projects so they'd be fully scalable.

      See more
      Akamai logo

      Akamai

      1.9K
      439
      0
      The leading platform for cloud, mobile, media and security across any device, anywhere.
      1.9K
      439
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF AKAMAI
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF AKAMAI
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Akamai posts

          MaxCDN logo

          MaxCDN

          1.6K
          553
          100
          Our CDN makes your site load faster!
          1.6K
          553
          + 1
          100
          PROS OF MAXCDN
          • 47
            Easy setup
          • 33
            Speed to my clients
          • 15
            Great service & Customer Support
          • 5
            Shared and Affordable SSL
          CONS OF MAXCDN
            Be the first to leave a con

            related MaxCDN posts

            Justin Dorfman
            Open Source Program Manager at Reblaze · | 4 upvotes · 242.3K views

            When my SSL cert MaxCDN was expiring on my personal site I decided it was a good time to revamp some things. Since GitHub Services is depreciated I can no longer have #CDN cache purges automated among other things. So I decided on the following: GitHub Pages, Netlify, Let's Encrypt and Jekyll. Staying the same was Bootstrap, jQuery, Grunt & #GoogleFonts.

            What's awesome about GitHub Pages is that it has a #CDN (Fastly) built-in and anytime you push to master, it purges the cache instantaneously without you have to do anything special. Netlify is magic, I highly recommend it to anyone using #StaticSiteGenerators.

            For the most part, everything went smoothly. The only things I had issues with were the following:

            • If you want to point www to GitHub Pages you need to rename the repo to www
            • If you edit something in the _config.yml you need to restart bundle exec jekyll s or changes won't show
            • I had to disable the Grunt htmlmin module. I replaced it with Jekyll layout that compresses HTML for #webperf

            Last but certainly not least, I made a donation to Let's Encrypt. If you use their service consider doing it too: https://letsencrypt.org/donate/

            See more
            Todd Gardner

            We migrated the hosting of our CDN, which is used to serve the JavaScript Error collection agent, from Amazon CloudFront to MaxCDN. During our test, we found MaxCDN to be more reliable and less expensive for serving he file.

            The reports and controls were also considerably better.

            See more
            Incapsula logo

            Incapsula

            1.3K
            72
            5
            Cloud-based service that makes websites safer, faster and more reliable.
            1.3K
            72
            + 1
            5
            PROS OF INCAPSULA
            • 5
              Best of them
            CONS OF INCAPSULA
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Incapsula posts