Alternatives to Blazor logo

Alternatives to Blazor

React, JavaScript, Vaadin, Xamarin, and Flutter are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Blazor.
434
590
+ 1
418

What is Blazor and what are its top alternatives?

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.
Blazor is a tool in the Front-End Frameworks category of a tech stack.
Blazor is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Blazor's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Blazor

  • React
    React

    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Vaadin
    Vaadin

    It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components ...

  • Xamarin
    Xamarin

    Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch. ...

  • Flutter
    Flutter

    Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android. ...

  • Bootstrap
    Bootstrap

    Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web. ...

  • Material Design for Angular
    Material Design for Angular

    Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs. ...

  • Animate.css
    Animate.css

    It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness. ...

Blazor alternatives & related posts

React logo

React

142.7K
117.5K
3.9K
A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
142.7K
117.5K
+ 1
3.9K
PROS OF REACT
  • 791
    Components
  • 661
    Virtual dom
  • 570
    Performance
  • 498
    Simplicity
  • 440
    Composable
  • 180
    Data flow
  • 164
    Declarative
  • 126
    Isn't an mvc framework
  • 115
    Reactive updates
  • 113
    Explicit app state
  • 42
    JSX
  • 26
    Learn once, write everywhere
  • 20
    Uni-directional data flow
  • 19
    Easy to Use
  • 16
    Works great with Flux Architecture
  • 11
    Great perfomance
  • 9
    Built by Facebook
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 6
    TypeScript support
  • 6
    Speed
  • 5
    Server Side Rendering
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Awesome
  • 5
    Hooks
  • 5
    Feels like the 90s
  • 5
    Easy to start
  • 5
    Cross-platform
  • 4
    Easy as Lego
  • 4
    Functional
  • 4
    Server side views
  • 4
    Fancy third party tools
  • 4
    Scales super well
  • 4
    Excellent Documentation
  • 4
    Props
  • 4
    Closer to standard JavaScript and HTML than others
  • 3
    Simple
  • 3
    Allows creating single page applications
  • 3
    Simple, easy to reason about and makes you productive
  • 3
    Fast evolving
  • 3
    SSR
  • 3
    Great migration pathway for older systems
  • 3
    Rich ecosystem
  • 3
    Super easy
  • 3
    Has functional components
  • 3
    Just the View of MVC
  • 3
    Beautiful and Neat Component Management
  • 3
    Sdfsdfsdf
  • 3
    Very gentle learning curve
  • 3
    Start simple
  • 3
    Has arrow functions
  • 3
    Strong Community
  • 2
    Every decision architecture wise makes sense
  • 2
    Sharable
  • 2
    Fragments
  • 2
    Permissively-licensed
  • 2
    Split your UI into components with one true state
  • 1
    Image upload
  • 1
    Recharts
CONS OF REACT
  • 36
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 25
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 24
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 9
    JSX
  • 7
    Not enterprise friendly
  • 5
    One-way binding only
  • 2
    State consistency with backend neglected
  • 2
    Bad Documentation
  • 1
    Paradigms change too fast

related React posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 2.2M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Adebayo Akinlaja
Engineering Manager at Andela · | 29 upvotes · 1.5M views

I picked up an idea to develop and it was no brainer I had to go with React for the frontend. I was faced with challenges when it came to what component framework to use. I had worked extensively with Material-UI but I needed something different that would offer me wider range of well customized components (I became pretty slow at styling). I brought in Evergreen after several sampling and reads online but again, after several prototype development against Evergreen—since I was using TypeScript and I had to import custom Type, it felt exhaustive. After I validated Evergreen with the designs of the idea I was developing, I also noticed I might have to do a lot of styling. I later stumbled on Material Kit, the one specifically made for React . It was promising with beautifully crafted components, most of which fits into the designs pages I had on ground.

A major problem of Material Kit for me is it isn't written in TypeScript and there isn't any plans to support its TypeScript version. I rolled up my sleeve and started converting their components to TypeScript and if you'll ask me, I am still on it.

In summary, I used the Create React App with TypeScript support and I am spending some time converting Material Kit to TypeScript before I start developing against it. All of these components are going to be hosted on Bit.

If you feel I am crazy or I have gotten something wrong, I'll be willing to listen to your opinion. Also, if you want to have a share of whatever TypeScript version of Material Kit I end up coming up with, let me know.

See more
JavaScript logo

JavaScript

281.5K
225.3K
7.9K
Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
281.5K
225.3K
+ 1
7.9K
PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 1.6K
    Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 1.5K
    It's everywhere
  • 1.2K
    Lots of great frameworks
  • 893
    Fast
  • 740
    Light weight
  • 423
    Flexible
  • 390
    You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
  • 286
    Non-blocking i/o
  • 235
    Ubiquitousness
  • 189
    Expressive
  • 53
    Extended functionality to web pages
  • 47
    Relatively easy language
  • 44
    Executed on the client side
  • 28
    Relatively fast to the end user
  • 23
    Pure Javascript
  • 19
    Functional programming
  • 13
    Async
  • 10
    Full-stack
  • 10
    Setup is easy
  • 10
    Its everywhere
  • 9
    Because I love functions
  • 8
    Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
  • 8
    JavaScript is the New PHP
  • 8
    Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
  • 7
    Future Language of The Web
  • 7
    Easy
  • 7
    Expansive community
  • 6
    Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
  • 6
    Most Popular Language in the World
  • 6
    For the good parts
  • 6
    Everyone use it
  • 6
    Love-hate relationship
  • 6
    Easy to hire developers
  • 6
    Evolution of C
  • 6
    Supports lambdas and closures
  • 6
    Agile, packages simple to use
  • 6
    Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
  • 5
    Versitile
  • 5
    Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
  • 5
    No need to use PHP
  • 5
    Its fun and fast
  • 5
    Powerful
  • 4
    It's fun
  • 4
    Stockholm Syndrome
  • 4
    Nice
  • 4
    Easy to make something
  • 4
    Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
  • 4
    It let's me use Babel & Typescript
  • 4
    Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
  • 4
    1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
  • 4
    What to add
  • 4
    Clojurescript
  • 4
    Function expressions are useful for callbacks
  • 4
    Everywhere
  • 4
    Hard not to use
  • 4
    Promise relationship
  • 4
    Scope manipulation
  • 4
    Client processing
  • 3
    Because it is so simple and lightweight
  • 3
    Only Programming language on browser
  • 0
    Easy to understand
CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
  • 21
    A constant moving target, too much churn
  • 20
    Horribly inconsistent
  • 14
    Javascript is the New PHP
  • 8
    No ability to monitor memory utilitization
  • 6
    Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
  • 5
    Can be ugly
  • 4
    Thinks strange results are better than errors
  • 2
    No GitHub
  • 1
    Slow

related JavaScript posts

Zach Holman

Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 41 upvotes · 5.5M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Vaadin logo

Vaadin

168
250
34
Components and tools for building web apps in Java
168
250
+ 1
34
PROS OF VAADIN
  • 8
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 5
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
  • 2
    Abstraction
  • 2
    Example packages
  • 1
    OSGI Support
CONS OF VAADIN
  • 3
    Paid for more features

related Vaadin posts

Xamarin logo

Xamarin

1.2K
1.5K
783
Create iOS, Android and Mac apps in C#
1.2K
1.5K
+ 1
783
PROS OF XAMARIN
  • 121
    Power of c# on mobile devices
  • 81
    Native performance
  • 78
    Native apps with native ui controls
  • 72
    No javascript - truely compiled code
  • 67
    Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
  • 45
    Ability to leverage visual studio
  • 44
    Mvvm pattern
  • 44
    Many great c# libraries
  • 36
    Amazing support
  • 34
    Powerful platform for .net developers
  • 19
    GUI Native look and Feel
  • 16
    Nuget package manager
  • 12
    Free
  • 9
    Enables code reuse on server
  • 9
    Backed by Microsoft
  • 8
    Faster Development
  • 7
    Best performance than other cross-platform
  • 7
    Use of third-party .NET libraries
  • 7
    Easy Debug and Trace
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 7
    It's free since Apr 2016
  • 6
    Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
  • 6
    Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
  • 5
    That just work for every scenario
  • 5
    Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
  • 5
    C# mult paradigm language
  • 4
    Microsoft stack
  • 4
    Great docs
  • 4
    Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
  • 4
    Microsoft backed
  • 3
    Small learning curve for Mobile developers
  • 3
    Well Designed
  • 2
    Ability to leverage legacy C and C++
  • 2
    Ionic
CONS OF XAMARIN
  • 9
    Build times
  • 5
    Visual Studio
  • 3
    Complexity
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 3
    Price
  • 2
    Nuget
  • 2
    Maturity
  • 2
    Build Tools
  • 2
    Support
  • 0
    Maturidade
  • 0
    Performance

related Xamarin posts

Greg Neumann
Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1M views

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more
Bhupendra Madhu
Web Developer at Ecombooks · | 8 upvotes · 23.4K views

I want to learn cross-platform application frameworks like React Native, Flutter, Xamarin, or Ionic, and I'm a web developer. I can learn other programming languages as well. But I'm confused about what to learn, which framework is best, and which framework will last long as the application grows further into complexity.

See more
Flutter logo

Flutter

12.5K
12.6K
1.1K
Cross-platform mobile framework from Google
12.5K
12.6K
+ 1
1.1K
PROS OF FLUTTER
  • 129
    Hot Reload
  • 107
    Cross platform
  • 98
    Performance
  • 83
    Backed by Google
  • 69
    Compiled into Native Code
  • 54
    Fast Development
  • 54
    Open Source
  • 49
    Fast Prototyping
  • 44
    Expressive and Flexible UI
  • 43
    Single Codebase
  • 35
    Reactive Programming
  • 31
    Material Design
  • 26
    Widget-based
  • 25
    Dart
  • 24
    Target to Fuchsia
  • 17
    IOS + Android
  • 14
    Easy to learn
  • 14
    Great CLI Support
  • 13
    Tooling
  • 13
    You can use it as mobile, web, Server development
  • 12
    Have built-in Material theme
  • 11
    Community
  • 11
    Target to Android
  • 11
    Good docs & sample code
  • 11
    Debugging quickly
  • 10
    Support by multiple IDE: Android Studio, VS Code, XCode
  • 9
    Easy Testing Support
  • 9
    Written by Dart, which is easy to read code
  • 8
    Real platform free framework of the future
  • 8
    Target to iOS
  • 8
    Have built-in Cupertino theme
  • 7
    Easy to Unit Test
  • 7
    Easy to Widget Test
CONS OF FLUTTER
  • 28
    Need to learn Dart
  • 10
    No 3D Graphics Engine Support
  • 9
    Lack of community support
  • 7
    Graphics programming
  • 6
    Lack of friendly documentation
  • 2
    Lack of promotion
  • 1
    Https://iphtechnologies.com/difference-between-flutter

related Flutter posts

Vaibhav Taunk
Team Lead at Technovert · | 31 upvotes · 2.2M views

I am starting to become a full-stack developer, by choosing and learning .NET Core for API Development, Angular CLI / React for UI Development, MongoDB for database, as it a NoSQL DB and Flutter / React Native for Mobile App Development. Using Postman, Markdown and Visual Studio Code for development.

See more
Shared insights
on
DartDartFlutterFlutter

Hi, I'm considering building a social marketplace app on android, ios and web, Flutter seems to be a good UI framework for cross-platform apps, it's safe type, hot reload, and native compiling on native machine code (thanks to Dart). My question is, for an MVP product is it a good choice? if yes, will it be on the mid-term, long term? Or will I have to change as the users grow?

thank you

See more
Bootstrap logo

Bootstrap

54.8K
12.6K
7.7K
Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions
54.8K
12.6K
+ 1
7.7K
PROS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 1.6K
    Responsiveness
  • 1.2K
    UI components
  • 944
    Consistent
  • 779
    Great docs
  • 678
    Flexible
  • 472
    HTML, CSS, and JS framework
  • 411
    Open source
  • 374
    Widely used
  • 367
    Customizable
  • 242
    HTML framework
  • 77
    Popular
  • 77
    Mobile first
  • 77
    Easy setup
  • 58
    Great grid system
  • 52
    Great community
  • 38
    Future compatibility
  • 34
    Integration
  • 28
    Very powerful foundational front-end framework
  • 24
    Standard
  • 23
    Javascript plugins
  • 19
    Build faster prototypes
  • 18
    Preprocessors
  • 14
    Grids
  • 9
    Good for a person who hates CSS
  • 8
    Clean
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Easy to setup and learn
  • 4
    Love it
  • 3
    Great and easy to use
  • 2
    Community
  • 2
    Provide angular wrapper
  • 2
    Great and easy
  • 2
    Boostrap
  • 2
    Powerful grid system, Rapid development, Customization
  • 2
    Great customer support
  • 2
    Popularity
  • 2
    Clean and quick frontend development
  • 2
    Great and easy to make a responsive website
  • 2
    Sprzedam opla
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Responsive design
  • 1
    Geo
  • 1
    Painless front end development
  • 1
    Design Agnostic
  • 1
    So clean and simple
  • 1
    Numerous components
  • 1
    Recognizable
  • 1
    Intuitive
  • 1
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 1
    Material-ui
  • 1
    Love the classes?
  • 1
    Pre-Defined components
  • 1
    Felxible, comfortable, user-friendly
  • 1
    The fame
  • 1
    Easy setup2
  • 1
    It's fast
CONS OF BOOTSTRAP
  • 25
    Javascript is tied to jquery
  • 16
    Every site uses the defaults
  • 15
    Grid system break points aren't ideal
  • 14
    Too much heavy decoration in default look
  • 8
    Verbose styles
  • 1
    Super heavy

related Bootstrap posts

Ganesa Vijayakumar
Full Stack Coder | Technical Lead · | 19 upvotes · 3.2M views

I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

Thanks, Ganesa

See more
Francisco Quintero
Tech Lead at Dev As Pros · | 13 upvotes · 1M views

For Etom, a side project. We wanted to test an idea for a future and bigger project.

What Etom does is searching places. Right now, it leverages the Google Maps API. For that, we found a React component that makes this integration easy because using Google Maps API is not possible via normal API requests.

You kind of need a map to work as a proxy between the software and Google Maps API.

We hate configuration(coming from Rails world) so also decided to use Create React App because setting up a React app, with all the toys, it's a hard job.

Thanks to all the people behind Create React App it's easier to start any React application.

We also chose a module called Reactstrap which is Bootstrap UI in React components.

An important thing in this side project(and in the bigger project plan) is to measure visitor through out the app. For that we researched and found that Keen was a good choice(very good free tier limits) and also it is very simple to setup and real simple to send data to

Slack and Trello are our defaults tools to comunicate ideas and discuss topics, so, no brainer using them as well for this project.

See more
Material Design for Angular logo

Material Design for Angular

10.1K
8.2K
519
Material Design for AngularJS Apps
10.1K
8.2K
+ 1
519
PROS OF MATERIAL DESIGN FOR ANGULAR
  • 120
    Ui components
  • 62
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Free
  • 50
    Backed by angular
  • 47
    Javascript
  • 34
    Open source
  • 32
    Responsiveness
  • 31
    Easy to learn
  • 28
    Quick to develop
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 8
    Easy to start
  • 8
    Powerful
  • 6
    Themes
  • 6
    Flexible
  • 4
    Flexbox Layouts
  • 3
    Great community
  • 3
    I like its design
  • 2
    Great extensions
  • 1
    CDK
  • 1
    Consistents
  • 1
    It's the best looking out of the box
  • 1
    Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs
  • 0
    Progressive Web Apps - to learn
CONS OF MATERIAL DESIGN FOR ANGULAR
  • 4
    No practical examples

related Material Design for Angular posts

Animate.css  logo

Animate.css

10.1K
2.2K
0
A library of CSS animations
10.1K
2.2K
+ 1
0
PROS OF ANIMATE.CSS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF ANIMATE.CSS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Animate.css posts