StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Project Management
  5. Asana vs Confluence vs Slack

Asana vs Confluence vs Slack

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Asana
Asana
Stacks9.8K
Followers7.3K
Votes655
Slack
Slack
Stacks120.8K
Followers97.7K
Votes6.0K
Confluence
Confluence
Stacks26.6K
Followers19.5K
Votes202

Asana vs Confluence vs Slack: What are the differences?

  1. Integration Capabilities: Asana offers integrations with various third-party applications such as Google Drive, Slack, and Microsoft Teams, enabling users to connect their work processes seamlessly. Confluence, on the other hand, integrates with tools like Jira, Trello, and Google Calendar, providing a different set of integration capabilities. Slack, being a communication-centered platform, integrates with a wide range of apps including Google Drive, Zoom, and Salesforce, enhancing collaboration and communication within teams.

  2. Focus of Collaboration: Asana is primarily focused on task and project management, providing features like task assignment, progress tracking, and deadlines. Confluence, however, is more geared towards creating and storing collaborative documents, knowledge bases, and centralized resources. Slack, being a communication tool, emphasizes real-time messaging, file sharing, and team communication, making it a hub for team collaboration.

  3. User Interface: Asana offers a clean and simple user interface that facilitates easy navigation through tasks, projects, and team discussions. Confluence, on the other hand, provides a structured layout for creating and organizing content, with features like templates and macros for enhanced documentation. Slack's user interface is designed for quick communication, with channels, direct messages, and integrations readily accessible for efficient team collaboration.

  4. Communication Features: Asana includes communication features such as task comments and updates, enabling team members to discuss project progress within the application. Confluence focuses more on document commenting and contextual discussions within the content being created. Slack, on the other hand, emphasizes real-time communication through channels, direct messages, and integrations, allowing teams to communicate efficiently and collaborate effectively.

  5. Project Management Capabilities: Asana offers robust project management capabilities such as Gantt charts, timeline views, and workload management, making it suitable for complex project planning and execution. Confluence, while providing project tracking features, is more focused on creating and organizing documentation for teams. Slack, although not a project management tool, facilitates project communication and coordination through channels, notifications, and integrations.

In Summary, Asana, Confluence, and Slack each offer unique strengths in collaboration, project management, and communication, catering to different aspects of team productivity and workflow management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Asana, Slack, Confluence

Remotor
Remotor

Apr 13, 2020

Decided

Keybase is a powerful and secure team-organizing software. And because Keybase is so transparently good at what it does, Keybase is a foundational software that facilitates the future of work: effective, inclusive, secure Remote Teams.

Keybase is a free, end-to-end encrypted, open-source program with almost limitless flexibility. Each Keybase user or team is a unique cryptographic identity. Each message or interaction that a user has with a team or other user, is verifiable and digitally-signed. Custom combinations of users/teams/bots, can be designed to catalyze Remote Teams of all kinds, this process can also be automated. Keybase includes Git integration for versioning, bots from multiple platforms to facilitate audio/video-conferencing, a Cryptocurrency wallet, and many advanced privacy features to make you more or less traceable.

Services like Slack and Discord are centralized platforms that perform analytics on your behavior and can sell or leak this data to 3rd parties. Any audio/video features available within Slack or Discord, are bound to be less secure and less flexible than excellent alternatives such as Jitsi. Slack and Discord do have a fun, causal feel to them, which can potentially facilitate social engagement in certain conditions (also many users are already on these platforms).

Centralized and Proprietary team platforms such as Discord and Slack have a large market presence (at least in the USA) based on their first-mover advantage, name recognition, and network effects from size. However these products do not have the flexibility or power of Keybase. Keybase excels on its own excellence, and also has an open and active developer community.

Find us on Keybase: @remotorteam (Keybase username) @remotor.public (Public Keybase Team)

132k views132k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 24, 2019

Needs adviceonGitterGitterDiscordDiscordSpectrumSpectrum

From a StackShare Community member: “We’re about to start a chat group for our open source project (over 5K stars on GitHub) so we can let our community collaborate more closely. The obvious choice would be Slack (k8s and a ton of major projects use it), but we’ve seen Gitter (webpack uses it) for a lot of open source projects, Discord (Vue.js moved to them), and as of late I’m seeing Spectrum more and more often. Does anyone have experience with these or other alternatives? Is it even worth assessing all these options, or should we just go with Slack? Some things that are important to us: free, all the regular integrations (GitHub, Heroku, etc), mobile & desktop apps, and open source is of course a plus."

1.32M views1.32M
Comments
Mike
Mike

Jun 19, 2020

Needs adviceonAha!Aha!TrelloTrelloAsanaAsana

I'm comparing Aha!, Trello and Asana. We are looking for it as a Product Management Team. Jira handles all our development and storyboard etc. This is for Product Management for Roadmaps, Backlogs, future stories, etc. Cost is a factor, as well. Does anyone have a comparison chart of Pros and Cons? Thank you.

492k views492k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Asana
Asana
Slack
Slack
Confluence
Confluence

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

Updated in real-time;Multiple workspaces;People views;Follow tasks or projects;Real-time: see changes immediately;Activity feed for every task;iPhone & Android Apps;Email Bridge;REST API
Create open channels for the projects, groups and topics that the whole team shares.;Search with context;Autocomplete makes mentioning your teammates quick and painless.;Configurable notifications for desktop, mobile push and email keep you as informed as you’d like.;Everything is perfectly in sync as you move between your desktop, iPhone, iPad, or Android device.;Powerful search & archiving means you can forget when you need to: we’ll remember for you.;Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub Integration;Add comments for feedback & stars for easy retrieval;Built-in internal and external sharing options ensure you can get and share any file with anyone
Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security
Statistics
Stacks
9.8K
Stacks
120.8K
Stacks
26.6K
Followers
7.3K
Followers
97.7K
Followers
19.5K
Votes
655
Votes
6.0K
Votes
202
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 160
    Super fast task creation
  • 150
    Flexible project management
  • 101
    Free up to 15
  • 99
    Followers and commenting on tasks
  • 57
    Integration with external services
Cons
  • 0
    Not Cross Platform
Pros
  • 1209
    Easy to integrate with
  • 876
    Excellent interface on multiple platforms
  • 849
    Free
  • 694
    Mobile friendly
  • 690
    People really enjoy using it
Cons
  • 13
    Can be distracting depending on how you use it
  • 6
    Limit messages history
  • 6
    Requires some management for large teams
  • 5
    You don't really own your messages
  • 5
    Too expensive
Pros
  • 94
    Wiki search power
  • 62
    WYSIWYG editor
  • 43
    Full featured, works well with embedded docs
  • 3
    Expensive licenses
Cons
  • 3
    Expensive license
Integrations
Dropbox
Dropbox
Crashlytics
Crashlytics
Rollbar
Rollbar
Honeybadger
Honeybadger
Notism
Notism
GitHub
GitHub
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Zapier
Zapier
Stripe
Stripe
GoSquared
GoSquared
Dropbox
Dropbox
New Relic
New Relic
Google Drive
Google Drive
Zendesk
Zendesk
Mailchimp
Mailchimp
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Google Drive
Google Drive
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Jira
Jira
Gliffy
Gliffy

What are some alternatives to Asana, Slack, Confluence?

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Flowdock

Flowdock

Flowdock is a web-based team chat service that integrates with your tools to provide a window into your team's activities. With the team inbox, everyone on your team can stay up to date. Stay connected with Flowdock's iOS and Android apps.

Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack