Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

BlazeMeter

69
158
+ 1
13
Postman

94.4K
80.9K
+ 1
1.8K
Add tool

BlazeMeter vs Postman: What are the differences?

BlazeMeter vs Postman

BlazeMeter and Postman are both popular tools used for API testing, but they have some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Flexibility in testing: BlazeMeter offers more flexibility in terms of testing options as it supports both load testing and performance testing. It allows you to simulate large numbers of users accessing your API simultaneously, helping you identify any scalability issues. On the other hand, Postman primarily focuses on functional testing and does not have extensive load testing capabilities.

  2. Collaboration and sharing: BlazeMeter provides collaborative features that allow multiple team members to work on a test plan simultaneously. It also offers the functionality to share test results with stakeholders. Postman, on the other hand, has limited collaborative capabilities and is more suitable for individual test development.

  3. Integration with Continuous Integration (CI) tools: BlazeMeter is specifically designed to integrate with CI tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo. This allows you to easily incorporate API testing into your CI/CD pipeline. Postman, on the other hand, does not offer such extensive integration options with CI tools.

  4. Real-time monitoring: BlazeMeter provides real-time monitoring of API performance and response times, allowing you to analyze performance metrics while tests are running. Postman, on the other hand, does not have built-in real-time monitoring capabilities.

  5. Scripting capabilities: BlazeMeter supports advanced scripting languages like JMeter and Gatling, allowing you to create complex test scenarios. Postman, on the other hand, uses a simpler scripting language which may not be suitable for more intricate testing requirements.

  6. Test reporting and analytics: BlazeMeter offers comprehensive test reporting and analytics features, providing in-depth insights into test results. It allows you to generate detailed reports with various metrics and visualizations. Postman, on the other hand, provides basic test reporting features but lacks the advanced analytics capabilities of BlazeMeter.

In summary, while both BlazeMeter and Postman are valuable tools for API testing, BlazeMeter offers more extensive testing capabilities, collaboration features, and integration options with CI tools. However, Postman is more suitable for individual test development and provides a simpler interface for functional testing.

Advice on BlazeMeter and Postman
Needs advice
on
PostmanPostmanApiaryApiary
and
Swagger UISwagger UI

From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"

See more
Replies (3)
Jagdeep Singh
Tech Lead at ucreate.it · | 8 upvotes · 394.6K views

I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).

See more

I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.

See more
Sadik Ay
Recommends
on
PostmanPostman

I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.

See more
Decisions about BlazeMeter and Postman
Stephen Fox
Artificial Intelligence Fellow · | 1 upvote · 347.9K views

Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of BlazeMeter
Pros of Postman
  • 10
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
  • 490
    Easy to use
  • 369
    Great tool
  • 276
    Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
  • 156
    Easy setup, looks good
  • 144
    The best api workflow out there
  • 53
    It's the best
  • 53
    History feature
  • 44
    Adds real value to my workflow
  • 43
    Great interface that magically predicts your needs
  • 35
    The best in class app
  • 12
    Can save and share script
  • 10
    Fully featured without looking cluttered
  • 8
    Collections
  • 8
    Option to run scrips
  • 8
    Global/Environment Variables
  • 7
    Shareable Collections
  • 7
    Dead simple and useful. Excellent
  • 7
    Dark theme easy on the eyes
  • 6
    Awesome customer support
  • 6
    Great integration with newman
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    The test script is useful
  • 4
    Saves responses
  • 4
    This has simplified my testing significantly
  • 4
    Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
  • 4
    Easy as pie
  • 3
    API-network
  • 3
    I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
  • 3
    Mocking API calls with predefined response
  • 2
    Now supports GraphQL
  • 2
    Postman Runner CI Integration
  • 2
    Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
  • 2
    Continuous integration using newman
  • 2
    Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
  • 2
    Runner
  • 2
    Graph
  • 1
    <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of BlazeMeter
Cons of Postman
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric
  • 10
    Stores credentials in HTTP
  • 9
    Bloated features and UI
  • 8
    Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
  • 7
    Poor GraphQL support
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 3
    Not free after 5 users
  • 3
    Can't prompt for per-request variables
  • 1
    Import swagger
  • 1
    Support websocket
  • 1
    Import curl

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is BlazeMeter?

Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br>

What is Postman?

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use BlazeMeter?
What companies use Postman?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with BlazeMeter?
What tools integrate with Postman?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to BlazeMeter and Postman?
Flood IO
Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk.
Gatling
Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support.
Load Impact
It is performance testing platform brings performance testing to the developer’s turf. Developers of all skill levels are able to easily pick up manual testing with it and simply transition to the more modern principles of DevOps and performance testing automation.
Runscope
Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.
RedLine13
It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.
See all alternatives