Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
BlazeMeter vs Postman: What are the differences?
BlazeMeter vs Postman
BlazeMeter and Postman are both popular tools used for API testing, but they have some key differences that set them apart.
Flexibility in testing: BlazeMeter offers more flexibility in terms of testing options as it supports both load testing and performance testing. It allows you to simulate large numbers of users accessing your API simultaneously, helping you identify any scalability issues. On the other hand, Postman primarily focuses on functional testing and does not have extensive load testing capabilities.
Collaboration and sharing: BlazeMeter provides collaborative features that allow multiple team members to work on a test plan simultaneously. It also offers the functionality to share test results with stakeholders. Postman, on the other hand, has limited collaborative capabilities and is more suitable for individual test development.
Integration with Continuous Integration (CI) tools: BlazeMeter is specifically designed to integrate with CI tools like Jenkins, TeamCity, and Bamboo. This allows you to easily incorporate API testing into your CI/CD pipeline. Postman, on the other hand, does not offer such extensive integration options with CI tools.
Real-time monitoring: BlazeMeter provides real-time monitoring of API performance and response times, allowing you to analyze performance metrics while tests are running. Postman, on the other hand, does not have built-in real-time monitoring capabilities.
Scripting capabilities: BlazeMeter supports advanced scripting languages like JMeter and Gatling, allowing you to create complex test scenarios. Postman, on the other hand, uses a simpler scripting language which may not be suitable for more intricate testing requirements.
Test reporting and analytics: BlazeMeter offers comprehensive test reporting and analytics features, providing in-depth insights into test results. It allows you to generate detailed reports with various metrics and visualizations. Postman, on the other hand, provides basic test reporting features but lacks the advanced analytics capabilities of BlazeMeter.
In summary, while both BlazeMeter and Postman are valuable tools for API testing, BlazeMeter offers more extensive testing capabilities, collaboration features, and integration options with CI tools. However, Postman is more suitable for individual test development and provides a simpler interface for functional testing.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of BlazeMeter
- I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.10
- Easy to prepare JMeter workers3
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of BlazeMeter
- Costly1
- UI centric1
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1