CodePen vs GitHub

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CodePen

154
226
+ 1
0
GitHub

280.4K
244.6K
+ 1
10.3K
Add tool

CodePen vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language that can be used to format text in a simple and readable way, commonly used in websites.

Key differences between CodePen and GitHub:

  1. Hosting Platform: CodePen is primarily a hosting platform that allows users to write and share HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code snippets in an online editor. It provides a workspace where users can create and test their code, and easily share it with others. On the other hand, GitHub is a web-based hosting service for version control using Git. It is mainly used for managing and collaborating on software development projects, hosting code repositories, and providing version control features.

  2. Code Execution: CodePen provides an interactive environment where users can see the results of their code immediately, as they type. It has a live preview feature that displays the output of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code in real-time. In contrast, GitHub does not have built-in code execution capabilities. It is primarily used for storing and managing code repositories, allowing users to collaborate on code development, review changes, and track versions.

  3. Community and Collaboration: CodePen has a strong focus on community and collaboration. It provides a platform for users to explore, discover, and interact with other developers' code snippets. It allows users to follow each other, fork and remix code, leave comments, and join discussions. GitHub also supports collaboration by providing features like pull requests, issues tracking, and code review, but it is more oriented towards software development projects and collaboration within teams.

  4. Version Control: GitHub is a powerful version control system that allows multiple developers to work on a project simultaneously, managing changes, and ensuring the integrity and history of the code. It provides features like branching, merging, and conflict resolution, which are essential for managing collaborative software development. CodePen, on the other hand, does not offer advanced version control features and is more focused on individual code snippets and projects.

  5. Integration with Development Tools: GitHub offers integrations with various development tools, such as IDEs, code editors, continuous integration tools, and project management platforms. It provides APIs and webhooks for seamless integration with external systems and services. CodePen also supports some integrations and provides an API for programmatic access, but it is primarily designed as a standalone platform for code snippets and projects.

  6. Pricing Model: CodePen offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and benefits for paid users. The free plan allows users to create and share code snippets, while the paid plans offer more advanced features, like private pens, asset hosting, and collaboration tools. GitHub also offers free plans for individuals and small teams, but it has additional paid plans with more storage, advanced security features, and support options for larger organizations.

In Summary, CodePen is a hosting platform for code snippets with a focus on community and collaboration, providing an interactive environment for code execution. GitHub, on the other hand, is a web-based hosting service for version control, primarily used for managing software development projects and collaborating on code repositories.

Decisions about CodePen and GitHub
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 671K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CodePen
Pros of GitHub
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 1.8K
      Open source friendly
    • 1.5K
      Easy source control
    • 1.3K
      Nice UI
    • 1.1K
      Great for team collaboration
    • 867
      Easy setup
    • 504
      Issue tracker
    • 486
      Great community
    • 482
      Remote team collaboration
    • 451
      Great way to share
    • 442
      Pull request and features planning
    • 147
      Just works
    • 132
      Integrated in many tools
    • 121
      Free Public Repos
    • 116
      Github Gists
    • 112
      Github pages
    • 83
      Easy to find repos
    • 62
      Open source
    • 60
      It's free
    • 60
      Easy to find projects
    • 56
      Network effect
    • 49
      Extensive API
    • 43
      Organizations
    • 42
      Branching
    • 34
      Developer Profiles
    • 32
      Git Powered Wikis
    • 30
      Great for collaboration
    • 24
      It's fun
    • 23
      Clean interface and good integrations
    • 22
      Community SDK involvement
    • 20
      Learn from others source code
    • 16
      Because: Git
    • 14
      It integrates directly with Azure
    • 10
      Standard in Open Source collab
    • 10
      Newsfeed
    • 8
      It integrates directly with Hipchat
    • 8
      Fast
    • 8
      Beautiful user experience
    • 7
      Easy to discover new code libraries
    • 6
      Smooth integration
    • 6
      Cloud SCM
    • 6
      Nice API
    • 6
      Graphs
    • 6
      Integrations
    • 6
      It's awesome
    • 5
      Quick Onboarding
    • 5
      Reliable
    • 5
      Remarkable uptime
    • 5
      CI Integration
    • 5
      Hands down best online Git service available
    • 4
      Uses GIT
    • 4
      Version Control
    • 4
      Simple but powerful
    • 4
      Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
    • 4
      Free HTML hosting
    • 4
      Security options
    • 4
      Loved by developers
    • 4
      Easy to use and collaborate with others
    • 3
      Ci
    • 3
      IAM
    • 3
      Nice to use
    • 3
      Easy deployment via SSH
    • 2
      Easy to use
    • 2
      Leads the copycats
    • 2
      All in one development service
    • 2
      Free private repos
    • 2
      Free HTML hostings
    • 2
      Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
    • 2
      Beautiful
    • 2
      Easy source control and everything is backed up
    • 2
      IAM integration
    • 2
      Very Easy to Use
    • 2
      Good tools support
    • 2
      Issues tracker
    • 2
      Never dethroned
    • 2
      Self Hosted
    • 1
      Dasf
    • 1
      Profound

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of CodePen
    Cons of GitHub
    • 4
      No support for any other git-server than github
    • 53
      Owned by micrcosoft
    • 37
      Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
    • 15
      Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
    • 10
      API scoping could be better
    • 8
      Only 3 collaborators for private repos
    • 3
      Limited featureset for issue management
    • 2
      GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
    • 2
      Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
    • 1
      No multilingual interface
    • 1
      Takes a long time to commit
    • 1
      Expensive

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is CodePen?

    It is a social development environment for front-end designers and developers.. It functions as an online code editor and open-source learning environment, where developers can create code snippets, creatively named "pens", and test them.

    What is GitHub?

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use CodePen?
    What companies use GitHub?
    See which teams inside your own company are using CodePen or GitHub.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CodePen?
    What tools integrate with GitHub?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

    DigitalOcean

    GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
    2
    2370
    GitHubOptimizelySegment+3
    2
    1179
    Mar 18 2020 at 9:12AM

    LaunchDarkly

    GitHubLaunchDarkly+2
    7
    1116
    JavaScriptGitHubReact+12
    5
    4144
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    41
    36544
    What are some alternatives to CodePen and GitHub?
    CodeSandbox
    CodeSandbox allows developers to simply go to a URL in their browser to start building. This not only makes it easier to get started, it also makes it easier to share. You can just share your created work by sharing the URL, others can then (without downloading) further develop on these sandboxes.
    Codeanywhere
    A development platform that enables you to not only edit your files from underlying services like FTP, GitHub, Dropbox and the like, but on top of that gives you the ability to collaborate, embed and share through Codeanywhere on any device.
    JSFiddle
    It is an online community for testing and showcasing user-created and collaborational HTML, CSS and JavaScript code snippets, known as 'fiddles'. It allows for simulated AJAX calls.
    Atom
    At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.
    StackBlitz
    StackBlitz is the browser-based IDE that eliminates time-consuming local configuration and lets you spend 
more time coding. Develop with Next.js, React, Angular, Vite, and more in a Node.js development environment entirely in your browser
    See all alternatives