Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CodePen vs GitHub: What are the differences?
Introduction
Markdown is a lightweight markup language that can be used to format text in a simple and readable way, commonly used in websites.
Key differences between CodePen and GitHub:
Hosting Platform: CodePen is primarily a hosting platform that allows users to write and share HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code snippets in an online editor. It provides a workspace where users can create and test their code, and easily share it with others. On the other hand, GitHub is a web-based hosting service for version control using Git. It is mainly used for managing and collaborating on software development projects, hosting code repositories, and providing version control features.
Code Execution: CodePen provides an interactive environment where users can see the results of their code immediately, as they type. It has a live preview feature that displays the output of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code in real-time. In contrast, GitHub does not have built-in code execution capabilities. It is primarily used for storing and managing code repositories, allowing users to collaborate on code development, review changes, and track versions.
Community and Collaboration: CodePen has a strong focus on community and collaboration. It provides a platform for users to explore, discover, and interact with other developers' code snippets. It allows users to follow each other, fork and remix code, leave comments, and join discussions. GitHub also supports collaboration by providing features like pull requests, issues tracking, and code review, but it is more oriented towards software development projects and collaboration within teams.
Version Control: GitHub is a powerful version control system that allows multiple developers to work on a project simultaneously, managing changes, and ensuring the integrity and history of the code. It provides features like branching, merging, and conflict resolution, which are essential for managing collaborative software development. CodePen, on the other hand, does not offer advanced version control features and is more focused on individual code snippets and projects.
Integration with Development Tools: GitHub offers integrations with various development tools, such as IDEs, code editors, continuous integration tools, and project management platforms. It provides APIs and webhooks for seamless integration with external systems and services. CodePen also supports some integrations and provides an API for programmatic access, but it is primarily designed as a standalone platform for code snippets and projects.
Pricing Model: CodePen offers both free and paid plans, with additional features and benefits for paid users. The free plan allows users to create and share code snippets, while the paid plans offer more advanced features, like private pens, asset hosting, and collaboration tools. GitHub also offers free plans for individuals and small teams, but it has additional paid plans with more storage, advanced security features, and support options for larger organizations.
In Summary, CodePen is a hosting platform for code snippets with a focus on community and collaboration, providing an interactive environment for code execution. GitHub, on the other hand, is a web-based hosting service for version control, primarily used for managing software development projects and collaborating on code repositories.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.
Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!
At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.
Pros of CodePen
Pros of GitHub
- Open source friendly1.8K
- Easy source control1.5K
- Nice UI1.3K
- Great for team collaboration1.1K
- Easy setup867
- Issue tracker504
- Great community487
- Remote team collaboration483
- Great way to share449
- Pull request and features planning442
- Just works147
- Integrated in many tools132
- Free Public Repos122
- Github Gists116
- Github pages113
- Easy to find repos83
- Open source62
- Easy to find projects60
- It's free60
- Network effect56
- Extensive API49
- Organizations43
- Branching42
- Developer Profiles34
- Git Powered Wikis32
- Great for collaboration30
- It's fun24
- Clean interface and good integrations23
- Community SDK involvement22
- Learn from others source code20
- Because: Git16
- It integrates directly with Azure14
- Standard in Open Source collab10
- Newsfeed10
- Fast8
- Beautiful user experience8
- It integrates directly with Hipchat8
- Easy to discover new code libraries7
- Smooth integration6
- Integrations6
- Graphs6
- Nice API6
- It's awesome6
- Cloud SCM6
- Quick Onboarding5
- Remarkable uptime5
- CI Integration5
- Reliable5
- Hands down best online Git service available5
- Version Control4
- Unlimited Public Repos at no cost4
- Simple but powerful4
- Loved by developers4
- Free HTML hosting4
- Uses GIT4
- Security options4
- Easy to use and collaborate with others4
- Easy deployment via SSH3
- Ci3
- IAM3
- Nice to use3
- Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects2
- Beautiful2
- Self Hosted2
- Issues tracker2
- Easy source control and everything is backed up2
- Never dethroned2
- All in one development service2
- Good tools support2
- Free HTML hostings2
- IAM integration2
- Very Easy to Use2
- Easy to use2
- Leads the copycats2
- Free private repos2
- Profound1
- Dasf1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of CodePen
- No support for any other git-server than github4
Cons of GitHub
- Owned by micrcosoft55
- Expensive for lone developers that want private repos38
- Relatively slow product/feature release cadence15
- API scoping could be better10
- Only 3 collaborators for private repos9
- Limited featureset for issue management4
- Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens3
- GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions2
- No multilingual interface1
- Takes a long time to commit1
- Expensive1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is CodePen?
What is GitHub?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use CodePen?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with GitHub?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+11
+3
+2
+12
+17
+32
+12+17