StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. Customer Support
  4. Project Management
  5. Confluence vs Microsoft Teams

Confluence vs Microsoft Teams

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Confluence
Confluence
Stacks26.6K
Followers19.5K
Votes202
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes144

Confluence vs Microsoft Teams: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, we will outline the key differences between Confluence and Microsoft Teams. Confluence and Microsoft Teams are both collaboration tools widely used in businesses and organizations, but they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart.

  1. Integration with other tools: Confluence offers seamless integration with a wide range of tools such as Jira, Trello, and Slack, allowing teams to connect and work together using their preferred collaboration tools. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams provides tight integration with the Microsoft Office Suite, including apps like Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, enabling users to edit and collaborate on documents directly within the Teams platform.

  2. Communication and collaboration: While both Confluence and Microsoft Teams provide communication and collaboration features, they differ in their approach. Confluence focuses more on document collaboration and knowledge sharing, providing features like document management, version control, and commenting. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams emphasizes real-time communication and teamwork, offering features like instant messaging, video conferencing, and the ability to create channels for different project teams.

  3. Personalization and customization: Confluence offers a high level of customization, allowing users to create personalized spaces, templates, and macros to tailor the platform to their specific needs. It also supports add-ons and plugins that extend its functionalities. In contrast, Microsoft Teams provides a more standardized interface with limited customization options. However, it offers a wide variety of pre-built integrations and apps from the Microsoft App Store to enhance its functionality.

  4. Project management capabilities: Confluence is known for its robust project management capabilities, particularly when integrated with Jira. It allows teams to create project plans, track tasks, set deadlines, and generate reports. On the other hand, while Microsoft Teams offers some project management features like task assignments and deadlines, it is not as extensive as Confluence. Microsoft Teams focuses more on facilitating communication and collaboration rather than comprehensive project management.

  5. Access control and permissions: Confluence provides flexible access control and permissions settings, allowing users to define fine-grained restrictions on who can view, edit, and share content. It also supports granular permission schemes for different spaces and pages. In contrast, Microsoft Teams offers more simplified access control and permissions. Teams can be created with different levels of access, but the options for customization and fine-grained control are limited compared to Confluence.

  6. Target audience and use case: Confluence is primarily designed for knowledge management and documentation, making it suitable for teams that require a centralized platform for creating, organizing, and collaborating on documents and information. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is designed for team collaboration and communication, making it ideal for teams that need real-time communication, file sharing, and project collaboration.

In summary, Confluence offers extensive integration capabilities, robust project management features, and personalized customization options, focusing on document collaboration and knowledge sharing. On the other hand, Microsoft Teams emphasizes real-time communication, teamwork, and seamless integration with the Microsoft Office Suite, making it a more suitable choice for teams that require real-time collaboration and communication within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Confluence, Microsoft Teams

carlche0616
carlche0616

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

As it is the communication tool chosen for the course, our team will be using Slack to monitor the course announcements from our instructor as well as to communicate with the instructor and industry partners. The tool for communicating within the team will be Microsoft Teams. Microsoft Teams enables the team to share documents and edit them synchronously(Google Drive is not an option due to one team member's location). Since it also provides a group chat feature, we chose to use it as our communication tool to avoid using too many softwares.

197k views197k
Comments
Kirill
Kirill

GO/C developer at Duckling Sales

Feb 21, 2021

Decided

Since now Jira is offering pretty wide free plans, it can compete with asana at small teams. And they have a significant advantage especially if you're working in agile methodology. Confluence is also a big advantage, and also comes with a free plan, so it's a pretty big thing. But we had also talked about asana and used to work with it before a lot, but we chose to go with Jira, and it's pretty good for now.

63.6k views63.6k
Comments
Mohammad Hossein
Mohammad Hossein

Chief Technology Officer at Planallay Sdn Bhd

Jan 17, 2020

Decided

we were using slack and at the same time we had a subscription with office 365. after a while we hit the slack free limitation quota. and it got annoying. the search ability was useless in free tier. and more annoying whenever you search, it opens a webpage and doesn't do it in the app.

on mobile there were many cases that I didn't get notification of important discussions. rooms was the way to separate a talk. but it become tedious. each time for a new subject that you wanted to discuss, you needed to add all the team members into a new room. and after a while the room goes silent. you will end up with a tons of not-in-use rooms that you don't want to clean up them for history purposes. also the slack UI for sub discussion is very stupid. if someone forget to check the checkbox to post the subdiscussion in the main discussion thread, other team members even won't notice such discussion is in progress.

we was paying for office 365 and thought why not give the teams a shot. we won't be in worth situation than we are. we moved to teams and we loved it instantly, we had a separate tab aggregated all the files upload. we could reply on other talk. no need of creating a new room. this way room belongs to a team and not a certain topic. our sub discussion was visible to the whole team. enjoyed integration with azure and unlimited history. the best part was integration with outlook. it was a full suit solution. our stats become busy on outlook meeting events. we get weekly analyse. we didn't need to host our wiki seperated. we've created wiki per team. the communication was much more fun.

266k views266k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Confluence
Confluence
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

See content and chat history anytime, including team chats with Skype that are visible to the whole team. Private group chats are available for smaller group conversations.

Spaces;Pages;Editor;Macros;Tasks;Attachments;Notifications;Search;Mobile;JIRA Integration;Installation;Customize;Personal;Security
All your content, tools, people, and conversations are available in the team workspace;Enjoy built-in access to SharePoint, OneNote, and Skype for Business;Work on documents right in the app
Statistics
Stacks
26.6K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
19.5K
Followers
1.7K
Votes
202
Votes
144
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 94
    Wiki search power
  • 62
    WYSIWYG editor
  • 43
    Full featured, works well with embedded docs
  • 3
    Expensive licenses
Cons
  • 3
    Expensive license
Pros
  • 29
    Work well with the rest of Office 365 work flow
  • 24
    Mobile friendly
  • 19
    Free
  • 12
    Well-thought Design
  • 12
    Great integrations
Cons
  • 17
    Confusing UI
  • 12
    Bad performance on init and after quite a use
  • 10
    Bad Usermanagement
  • 6
    No desktop client (only fat and slow electron app)
  • 6
    Can't see all members in a video meeting
Integrations
GitLab
GitLab
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
GitHub
GitHub
Google Drive
Google Drive
Balsamiq
Balsamiq
Jira
Jira
Gliffy
Gliffy
Skype
Skype

What are some alternatives to Confluence, Microsoft Teams?

Slack

Slack

Imagine all your team communication in one place, instantly searchable, available wherever you go. That’s Slack. All your messages. All your files. And everything from Twitter, Dropbox, Google Docs, Asana, Trello, GitHub and dozens of other services. All together.

Trello

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

HipChat

HipChat

HipChat is a hosted private chat service for your company or team. Invite colleagues to share ideas and files in persistent group chat rooms. Get your team off AIM, Google Talk, and Skype — HipChat was built for business.

Asana

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Zulip

Zulip

Zulip is powerful, open source team chat that combines the immediacy of real-time chat with the productivity benefits of threaded conversations. Zulip allows busy managers and others in meetings all day to participate in their teams chats.

RocketChat

RocketChat

Rocket.Chat is a Web Chat Server, developed in JavaScript, using the Meteor fullstack framework. It is a great solution for communities and companies wanting to privately host their own chat service or for developers looking forward to build and evolve their own chat platforms.

Mattermost

Mattermost

Mattermost is modern communication from behind your firewall.

Gitter

Gitter

Free chat rooms for your public repositories. A bit like IRC only smarter. Chats for private repositories as well as organisations.

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps

Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.

Basecamp

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack