Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Datadog vs LogicMonitor: What are the differences?
Introduction
Datadog and LogicMonitor are both monitoring platforms that provide visibility into the performance and health of an IT infrastructure. While they share similar goals, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences to help you make an informed decision when choosing a monitoring solution for your organization.
Data Collection Flexibility: Datadog offers more flexibility in terms of data collection. It supports a wide range of integrations and provides the ability to collect custom metrics and logs. LogicMonitor, on the other hand, has a more limited set of integrations and focuses primarily on monitoring infrastructure devices such as servers, networking equipment, and storage devices.
Ease of Use: LogicMonitor is known for its simplicity and ease of use. The platform is designed to be intuitive and user-friendly, making it easier for non-technical users to set up and manage. Datadog, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and may require more technical expertise to fully utilize its features and capabilities.
Alerting and Notification: Datadog provides more advanced alerting and notification features compared to LogicMonitor. It allows users to create complex alerting rules based on custom metrics, thresholds, and anomaly detection. It also offers more flexibility in terms of notification channels and integrations with third-party tools. LogicMonitor, on the other hand, has a more basic alerting system that may not be as configurable or flexible.
Scalability and Performance: Datadog is known for its scalability and ability to handle large amounts of data. It is designed to handle high volumes of metrics, logs, and traces, making it suitable for large enterprises with complex and distributed environments. LogicMonitor, on the other hand, may not be as scalable and may encounter performance issues when dealing with large-scale deployments.
User Interface and Visualization: Datadog offers a more modern and visually appealing user interface compared to LogicMonitor. It provides rich visualization options, including customizable dashboards, charts, and graphs, making it easier to analyze and interpret data. LogicMonitor, on the other hand, has a more simplistic interface with limited customization options for visualizing data.
API and Automation: Datadog provides a powerful API that allows for automation and integration with other tools and systems. It offers comprehensive documentation and SDKs in multiple programming languages. LogicMonitor also has an API but may not offer the same level of flexibility and capabilities as Datadog.
In Summary, Datadog offers more flexibility in data collection, advanced alerting and notification features, scalability, and a visually appealing user interface compared to LogicMonitor. However, LogicMonitor excels in ease of use, simplicity, and may be a better fit for organizations with simpler monitoring needs.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.
We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.
We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.
You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?
Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as
- they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
- easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
- brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
- pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)
IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.
Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!
Hi Medeti,
you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.
As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/
We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/
Let me know if you need anything on top.
I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.
NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup
I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.
Coming from a Ruby background, we've been users of New Relic for quite some time. When we adopted Elixir, the New Relic integration was young and missing essential features, so we gave AppSignal a try. It worked for quite some time, we even implemented a :telemetry reporter for AppSignal . But it was difficult to correlate data in two monitoring solutions, New Relic was undergoing a UI overhaul which made it difficult to use, and AppSignal was missing the flexibility we needed. We had some fans of Datadog, so we gave it a try and it worked out perfectly. Datadog works great with Ruby , Elixir , JavaScript , and has powerful features our engineers love to use (notebooks, dashboards, very flexible alerting). Cherry on top - thanks to the Datadog Terraform provider everything is written as code, allowing us to collaborate on our Datadog setup.
I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.
In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.
The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:
- The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
- The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
- The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
- The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
- The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.
Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.
I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).
The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight
NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon
Pros of Datadog
- Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)139
- Easy setup107
- Powerful ui87
- Powerful integrations84
- Great value70
- Great visualization54
- Events + metrics = clarity46
- Notifications41
- Custom metrics41
- Flexibility39
- Free & paid plans19
- Great customer support16
- Makes my life easier15
- Adapts automatically as i scale up10
- Easy setup and plugins9
- Super easy and powerful8
- AWS support7
- In-context collaboration7
- Rich in features6
- Docker support5
- Cost4
- Full visibility of applications4
- Monitor almost everything4
- Cute logo4
- Automation tools4
- Source control and bug tracking4
- Simple, powerful, great for infra4
- Easy to Analyze4
- Best than others4
- Best in the field3
- Expensive3
- Good for Startups3
- Free setup3
- APM2
Pros of LogicMonitor
- Auto discovery5
- Fast deployment5
- Agentless3
- Awesome support3
- Very extensible3
- Strong Performance1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Datadog
- Expensive20
- No errors exception tracking4
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging2
- Complicated1
Cons of LogicMonitor
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Datadog?
What is LogicMonitor?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use LogicMonitor?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with LogicMonitor?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+32
+31
+22
+46+34+37+26
+44