StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. Git Flow vs GitHub

Git Flow vs GitHub

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Git Flow
Git Flow
Stacks91
Followers76
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.5K
Forks627

Git Flow vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Git Flow vs GitHub

Git Flow and GitHub are two essential tools used in software development, but they have distinct differences. Here are the key differences between Git Flow and GitHub:

  1. Branching Model: Git Flow follows a specific branching model consisting of two main branches, "develop" and "master." The "develop" branch is where ongoing development takes place, while the "master" branch stores production-ready code. In contrast, GitHub is a hosting platform for repositories, offering a distributed version control system that allows multiple users to collaborate on a project using branches and pull requests.

  2. Workflow Process: Git Flow provides a structured workflow that includes specific branch creation and merging strategies. It separates feature development from release and hotfix branches, facilitating stability and version control in a project. Conversely, GitHub does not enforce a specific workflow but provides collaborative features like pull requests, issue tracking, and code review tools, allowing teams to define their own workflows.

  3. Integration and Collaboration: Git Flow focuses on local and centralized repository management, emphasizing stable releases and hotfixes. It does not handle collaboration directly. In contrast, GitHub acts as a central hub for developers, offering collaboration features like pull requests, code review tools, and issue tracking. GitHub allows developers to collaborate and integrate changes seamlessly within a distributed team.

  4. Release Management: Git Flow provides a specific approach to managing software releases. It uses release branches to prepare for a new production release without disrupting ongoing development on the "develop" branch. GitHub, on the other hand, does not dictate a release management strategy, but it offers features like releases and tags to aid in managing software versions.

  5. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Git Flow has a more structured and rigid workflow, which may require additional time to understand and adapt to. It follows a set of predefined rules and best practices. GitHub, on the other hand, offers a more flexible approach, making it easier to use for beginners or teams looking for less stringent guidelines.

  6. Supported Features: Git Flow primarily focuses on version control and branch management, providing a streamlined process for feature development, release management, and hotfixes. On the other hand, GitHub offers a wide range of features beyond version control, such as issue tracking, project boards, continuous integration, and deployment (CI/CD), and various integrations with other development tools.

In summary, Git Flow provides a structured branching model and workflow specifically designed for release management, whereas GitHub is a collaborative hosting platform that supports version control, issue tracking, and offers a wide range of features for software development collaboration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Git Flow

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Git Flow
Git Flow

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

It provides excellent command line help and output. It is a merge based solution. It doesn't rebase feature branches.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
DevOps;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
627
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
91
Followers
259.0K
Followers
76
Votes
10.4K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Git Flow?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana