StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Jira

GitHub vs Jira

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.5K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Jira
Jira
Stacks62.5K
Followers49.5K
Votes1.2K

GitHub vs Jira: What are the differences?

GitHub and Jira are two popular tools used in software development. Here are the key differences between GitHub and Jira:

  1. Purpose and Focus: GitHub is primarily a code hosting and version control platform that focuses on collaborative software development. It provides features for managing source code, tracking issues, and facilitating collaboration among developers. On the other hand, Jira is a comprehensive project management tool that supports various aspects of software development, including issue tracking, project planning, task management, and team collaboration.

  2. Version Control vs Issue Tracking: GitHub is a code hosting and version control platform for collaborative software development, while Jira is a comprehensive project management tool that supports various aspects of software development, including issue tracking and team collaboration.

  3. Integration and Ecosystem: GitHub offers integrations with popular CI/CD tools, code quality analyzers, project management tools, and collaboration platforms. GitHub also supports webhook and API integrations, enabling custom integrations and automation. Jira, while it also provides integrations with external tools, has a more extensive ecosystem and supports integration with a wide range of development, testing, and deployment tools. Jira also offers extensive REST APIs for integrating with external systems and customizing workflows.

  4. User Interface and User Experience: GitHub provides a user-friendly and intuitive interface that is centered around code and collaboration. It offers a visually appealing interface for browsing code, managing repositories, and reviewing pull requests. GitHub's interface is optimized for developers and provides a smooth and efficient user experience. Jira, on the other hand, has a more comprehensive and configurable interface. It provides different views and boards for managing projects, tracking issues, and planning sprints. Jira's interface can be customized to fit the specific needs and workflows of different teams.

  5. Team Collaboration and Project Management: While GitHub offers basic project management features like issue tracking and task assignment, its primary focus is on code collaboration. Jira, on the other hand, offers advanced project management capabilities, such as agile boards, sprint planning, backlog management, and resource allocation. It supports different project management methodologies like Scrum and Kanban, making it suitable for teams that require comprehensive project management and coordination.

In summary, GitHub is more centered around code hosting, version control, and collaborative development, while Jira is a comprehensive project management tool that supports the entire software development lifecycle.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Jira

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Jira
Jira

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Jira's secret sauce is the way it simplifies the complexities of software development into manageable units of work. Jira comes out-of-the-box with everything agile teams need to ship value to customers faster.

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
Create user stories and issues, plan sprints, and distribute tasks across your software team; Prioritize and discuss your team’s work in full context with complete visibility; Ship with confidence and sanity knowing the information you have is always up-to-date; Improve team performance based on real-time, visual data that your team can put to use
Statistics
Stacks
295.5K
Stacks
62.5K
Followers
259.0K
Followers
49.5K
Votes
10.4K
Votes
1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 310
    Powerful
  • 254
    Flexible
  • 149
    Easy separation of projects
  • 113
    Run in the cloud
  • 105
    Code integration
Cons
  • 8
    Rather expensive
  • 5
    Large memory requirement
  • 2
    Slow
  • 1
    Cloud or Datacenter only
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Acunote
Acunote
Pivotal Tracker
Pivotal Tracker
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
SnapEngage
SnapEngage
HipChat
HipChat
New Relic
New Relic
Zendesk
Zendesk
Zopim
Zopim
UserVoice
UserVoice
Balsamiq
Balsamiq

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Jira?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana