StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Code Collaboration Version Control
  5. GitHub vs Snyk

GitHub vs Snyk

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub
GitHub
Stacks295.6K
Followers259.0K
Votes10.4K
Snyk
Snyk
Stacks580
Followers380
Votes20

GitHub vs Snyk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GitHub and Snyk

1. Integration with Development Workflow: GitHub is a web-based version control platform that enables developers to collaborate and manage their code. It provides a complete code development and management environment, allowing users to create repositories, collaborate on projects, and track changes made to the codebase. On the other hand, Snyk is primarily focused on security and vulnerability management. It integrates with the existing development workflow and provides automated security testing and monitoring to help developers identify and fix vulnerabilities in their code.

2. Scope and Purpose: GitHub is primarily used as a code repository and collaboration platform, allowing developers to work on code together and manage the versioning and history of their projects. It provides features like pull requests, issue tracking, and project management tools. Snyk, on the other hand, specifically focuses on identifying and fixing security vulnerabilities in software dependencies and container images. It provides automated vulnerability scanning, remediation advice, and developer-friendly workflows for fixing vulnerabilities.

3. Vulnerability Detection and Monitoring: GitHub provides basic vulnerability scanning through its Dependabot security alerts feature. It alerts developers about any known vulnerabilities in their project dependencies. However, Snyk provides more comprehensive vulnerability detection and monitoring capabilities. It offers advanced vulnerability databases and continuous monitoring for both open source and proprietary code. It can detect vulnerabilities not only in dependencies but also in container images, giving developers a more complete view of potential security threats.

4. Remediation Advice and Fixes: When a vulnerability is detected, GitHub provides information about the affected dependency and suggests possible solutions or fixes through its security alerts. However, Snyk goes a step further by providing extensive remediation advice and fixes. It offers actionable recommendations on how to remediate vulnerabilities, including code changes and version upgrades. Snyk also provides pull requests and automated fixes for certain vulnerabilities, making it easier for developers to apply the necessary patches.

5. Developer-Focused Workflow: GitHub provides a developer-friendly workflow with features like pull requests, code review tools, and project management functionalities. It is designed to facilitate collaboration and code contribution among developers. Snyk, on the other hand, focuses on providing developers with a streamlined and integrated security workflow. It integrates with popular development tools and CI/CD pipelines, enabling developers to easily incorporate security testing and remediation into their existing processes.

6. Open Source and Pricing: GitHub offers free hosting for public repositories and a range of paid plans for private repositories. It also provides free access to its basic security features, including vulnerability alerts. Snyk offers a free tier for open source projects, allowing developers to scan and monitor vulnerabilities in their open source dependencies. However, for private repositories and additional features like detailed vulnerability reports and fix PRs, Snyk offers different pricing tiers.

In Summary, GitHub provides a comprehensive code development and management platform, while Snyk focuses specifically on vulnerability detection, monitoring, and remediation in software dependencies and container images.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub, Snyk

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub
GitHub
Snyk
Snyk

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Automatically find & fix vulnerabilities in your code, containers, Kubernetes, and Terraform

Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions
-
Statistics
Stacks
295.6K
Stacks
580
Followers
259.0K
Followers
380
Votes
10.4K
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1773
    Open source friendly
  • 1463
    Easy source control
  • 1254
    Nice UI
  • 1137
    Great for team collaboration
  • 868
    Easy setup
Cons
  • 56
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
Pros
  • 10
    Github Integration
  • 5
    Free for open source projects
  • 4
    Finds lots of real vulnerabilities
  • 1
    Easy to deployed
Cons
  • 2
    Does not integrated with SonarQube
  • 1
    False positives
  • 1
    Complex UI
  • 1
    No surface monitoring
  • 1
    No malware detection
Integrations
Grove
Grove
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
Airbrake
Airbrake
Codeship
Codeship
Bugsnag
Bugsnag
BugHerd
BugHerd
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
HipChat
HipChat
CopperEgg
CopperEgg
Nitrous.IO
Nitrous.IO
Scala
Scala
.NET
.NET
CircleCI
CircleCI
Docker
Docker
JavaScript
JavaScript
Node.js
Node.js
Python
Python
Golang
Golang
Java
Java
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Snyk?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana