Overview

GitHub

Stacks296.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.3K

TortoiseSVN

Stacks54

Followers117

Votes3

GitHub Stars43

Forks30

GitHub vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitHub and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems that are commonly used in software development projects. While they serve the same purpose of managing and tracking changes to source code, there are several key differences between the two.

Integration with Git vs Subversion: GitHub is primarily designed for hosting Git repositories, which is a distributed version control system. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a client for Subversion, which is a centralized version control system. This means that GitHub is tailored for distributed workflows, allowing multiple developers to work on different branches and merge changes easily, while TortoiseSVN follows a centralized model with a single repository and controlled access.
Graphical Interface vs Shell Integration: GitHub provides a web-based graphical interface that allows users to navigate repositories, track issues, manage pull requests, and view commit history. In contrast, TortoiseSVN integrates with the Windows Explorer shell, providing a seamless UI experience with context menus, overlays, and tooltips directly within the file system.
Collaboration and Social Features: GitHub offers a rich set of collaboration and social features, such as project boards, wikis, discussions, and the ability to follow other users and projects. These features facilitate community engagement, code reviews, and project management. TortoiseSVN, being primarily a version control client, lacks these social aspects and focuses more on efficient code management.
Branching and Merging: GitHub makes it incredibly easy to create branches, which are lightweight and enable developers to work on isolated features without affecting the main codebase. Merging these branches back into the main branch is also simplified with features like pull requests and automatic conflict resolution. TortoiseSVN, while supporting branching and merging, requires more manual intervention and can sometimes result in conflicts that need to be resolved by the user.
Open Source vs Proprietary Software: GitHub is an open-source platform, allowing anyone to create repositories, collaborate on projects, and contribute to the community. This fosters a culture of openness, transparency, and shared knowledge. TortoiseSVN, while free to use, is a proprietary software developed by a single company, with a more controlled and regulated environment.
Workflows and Ecosystem: GitHub has gained immense popularity in the software development industry, and as a result, many tools, libraries, and frameworks are built with GitHub integration in mind. Its extensive ecosystem includes features like continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) services, code review tools, project management integrations, and numerous third-party applications. TortoiseSVN, being more specialized in Subversion, has a more limited ecosystem with fewer integrations and plugins available.

In Summary, GitHub, with its distributed nature, graphical interface, rich collaboration features, streamlined branching and merging, open-source philosophy, and extensive ecosystem, offers a powerful and flexible version control platform that caters to the needs of modern software development projects. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN, with its centralized model, seamless Windows integration, focus on efficient code management, proprietary nature, and relatively simpler workflow, provides a more straightforward solution for version control in certain scenarios.

Advice on GitHub, TortoiseSVN

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

623k views623k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.18M views1.18M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	TortoiseSVN
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Easy to use. all commands are available directly from the Windows Explorer;Powerful commit dialog. integrated spell checker for log messages;Per project settings;Integration with issue tracking systems; Helpful Tools;Available in many languages
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 43
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 30
Stacks 296.5K	Stacks 54
Followers 259.0K	Followers 117
Votes 10.3K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 3 Easy to use
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	Windows Visual Studio Code

What are some alternatives to GitHub, TortoiseSVN?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.