Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

GitHub

285.6K
249.5K
+ 1
10.3K
TortoiseSVN

49
112
+ 1
1
Add tool

GitHub vs TortoiseSVN: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitHub and TortoiseSVN are both version control systems that are commonly used in software development projects. While they serve the same purpose of managing and tracking changes to source code, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Integration with Git vs Subversion: GitHub is primarily designed for hosting Git repositories, which is a distributed version control system. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN is a client for Subversion, which is a centralized version control system. This means that GitHub is tailored for distributed workflows, allowing multiple developers to work on different branches and merge changes easily, while TortoiseSVN follows a centralized model with a single repository and controlled access.

  2. Graphical Interface vs Shell Integration: GitHub provides a web-based graphical interface that allows users to navigate repositories, track issues, manage pull requests, and view commit history. In contrast, TortoiseSVN integrates with the Windows Explorer shell, providing a seamless UI experience with context menus, overlays, and tooltips directly within the file system.

  3. Collaboration and Social Features: GitHub offers a rich set of collaboration and social features, such as project boards, wikis, discussions, and the ability to follow other users and projects. These features facilitate community engagement, code reviews, and project management. TortoiseSVN, being primarily a version control client, lacks these social aspects and focuses more on efficient code management.

  4. Branching and Merging: GitHub makes it incredibly easy to create branches, which are lightweight and enable developers to work on isolated features without affecting the main codebase. Merging these branches back into the main branch is also simplified with features like pull requests and automatic conflict resolution. TortoiseSVN, while supporting branching and merging, requires more manual intervention and can sometimes result in conflicts that need to be resolved by the user.

  5. Open Source vs Proprietary Software: GitHub is an open-source platform, allowing anyone to create repositories, collaborate on projects, and contribute to the community. This fosters a culture of openness, transparency, and shared knowledge. TortoiseSVN, while free to use, is a proprietary software developed by a single company, with a more controlled and regulated environment.

  6. Workflows and Ecosystem: GitHub has gained immense popularity in the software development industry, and as a result, many tools, libraries, and frameworks are built with GitHub integration in mind. Its extensive ecosystem includes features like continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD) services, code review tools, project management integrations, and numerous third-party applications. TortoiseSVN, being more specialized in Subversion, has a more limited ecosystem with fewer integrations and plugins available.

In Summary, GitHub, with its distributed nature, graphical interface, rich collaboration features, streamlined branching and merging, open-source philosophy, and extensive ecosystem, offers a powerful and flexible version control platform that caters to the needs of modern software development projects. On the other hand, TortoiseSVN, with its centralized model, seamless Windows integration, focus on efficient code management, proprietary nature, and relatively simpler workflow, provides a more straightforward solution for version control in certain scenarios.

Decisions about GitHub and TortoiseSVN
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 702.9K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of GitHub
Pros of TortoiseSVN
  • 1.8K
    Open source friendly
  • 1.5K
    Easy source control
  • 1.3K
    Nice UI
  • 1.1K
    Great for team collaboration
  • 867
    Easy setup
  • 504
    Issue tracker
  • 487
    Great community
  • 483
    Remote team collaboration
  • 449
    Great way to share
  • 442
    Pull request and features planning
  • 147
    Just works
  • 132
    Integrated in many tools
  • 122
    Free Public Repos
  • 116
    Github Gists
  • 113
    Github pages
  • 83
    Easy to find repos
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Easy to find projects
  • 60
    It's free
  • 56
    Network effect
  • 49
    Extensive API
  • 43
    Organizations
  • 42
    Branching
  • 34
    Developer Profiles
  • 32
    Git Powered Wikis
  • 30
    Great for collaboration
  • 24
    It's fun
  • 23
    Clean interface and good integrations
  • 22
    Community SDK involvement
  • 20
    Learn from others source code
  • 16
    Because: Git
  • 14
    It integrates directly with Azure
  • 10
    Standard in Open Source collab
  • 10
    Newsfeed
  • 8
    Fast
  • 8
    Beautiful user experience
  • 8
    It integrates directly with Hipchat
  • 7
    Easy to discover new code libraries
  • 6
    Smooth integration
  • 6
    Integrations
  • 6
    Graphs
  • 6
    Nice API
  • 6
    It's awesome
  • 6
    Cloud SCM
  • 5
    Quick Onboarding
  • 5
    Remarkable uptime
  • 5
    CI Integration
  • 5
    Reliable
  • 5
    Hands down best online Git service available
  • 4
    Version Control
  • 4
    Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
  • 4
    Simple but powerful
  • 4
    Loved by developers
  • 4
    Free HTML hosting
  • 4
    Uses GIT
  • 4
    Security options
  • 4
    Easy to use and collaborate with others
  • 3
    Easy deployment via SSH
  • 3
    Ci
  • 3
    IAM
  • 3
    Nice to use
  • 2
    Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
  • 2
    Beautiful
  • 2
    Self Hosted
  • 2
    Issues tracker
  • 2
    Easy source control and everything is backed up
  • 2
    Never dethroned
  • 2
    All in one development service
  • 2
    Good tools support
  • 2
    Free HTML hostings
  • 2
    IAM integration
  • 2
    Very Easy to Use
  • 2
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Leads the copycats
  • 2
    Free private repos
  • 1
    Profound
  • 1
    Dasf
  • 1
    Easy to use

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of GitHub
Cons of TortoiseSVN
  • 55
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 38
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 9
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
  • 4
    Limited featureset for issue management
  • 3
    Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
  • 2
    GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
  • 1
    No multilingual interface
  • 1
    Takes a long time to commit
  • 1
    Expensive
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is GitHub?

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

    What is TortoiseSVN?

    It is an Apache™ Subversion (SVN)® client, implemented as a Windows shell extension. It's intuitive and easy to use, since it doesn't require the Subversion command line client to run. And it is free to use, even in a commercial environment.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use GitHub?
    What companies use TortoiseSVN?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with GitHub?
    What tools integrate with TortoiseSVN?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM

    DigitalOcean

    GitHubMySQLPostgreSQL+11
    2
    2439
    GitHubOptimizelySegment+3
    2
    1202
    Mar 18 2020 at 9:12AM

    LaunchDarkly

    GitHubLaunchDarkly+2
    7
    1142
    JavaScriptGitHubReact+12
    5
    4197
    GitHubDockerReact+17
    41
    37295
    What are some alternatives to GitHub and TortoiseSVN?
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
    AWS CodeCommit
    CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
    Git
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    SVN (Subversion)
    Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
    See all alternatives