Alternatives to BombBomb logo

Alternatives to BombBomb

Loom, Vidyard, Mailchimp, Zoom, and Wistia are the most popular alternatives and competitors to BombBomb.
3
7
+ 1
0

What is BombBomb and what are its top alternatives?

It is a video email marketing platform that allows users to create and build relationships through video. Videos can be sent through email, text, or social media - letting you reach anyone you need to at any time.
BombBomb is a tool in the Video Marketing and Analytics category of a tech stack.
BombBomb is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to BombBomb's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to BombBomb

  • Loom
    Loom

    It is a work communication tool that helps you get your message across through instantly shareable video. ...

  • Vidyard
    Vidyard

    Vidyard is a powerful video analytics and hosting platform designed for content marketers. Get the most out of your video assets with in-depth data on viewer behaviour that can be automatically pushed into your marketing automation system and/or CRM. ...

  • Mailchimp
    Mailchimp

    MailChimp helps you design email newsletters, share them on social networks, integrate with services you already use, and track your results. It's like your own personal publishing platform. ...

  • Zoom
    Zoom

    Zoom unifies cloud video conferencing, simple online meetings, and cross platform group chat into one easy-to-use platform. Our solution offers the best video, audio, and screen-sharing experience across Zoom Rooms, Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, and H.323/SIP room systems. ...

  • Wistia
    Wistia

    It is designed exclusively to serve companies using video on their websites for marketing, support, and sales. ...

  • Google Analytics
    Google Analytics

    Google Analytics lets you measure your advertising ROI as well as track your Flash, video, and social networking sites and applications. ...

  • Google Tag Manager
    Google Tag Manager

    Tag Manager gives you the ability to add and update your own tags for conversion tracking, site analytics, remarketing, and more. There are nearly endless ways to track user behavior across your sites and apps, and the intuitive design lets you change tags whenever you want. ...

  • Mixpanel
    Mixpanel

    Mixpanel helps companies build better products through data. With our powerful, self-serve product analytics solution, teams can easily analyze how and why people engage, convert, and retain to improve their user experience. ...

BombBomb alternatives & related posts

Loom logo

Loom

131
0
A work communication tool
131
0
PROS OF LOOM
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF LOOM
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Loom posts

      Vidyard logo

      Vidyard

      16
      0
      Turn your video content into powerful marketing tools
      16
      0
      PROS OF VIDYARD
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF VIDYARD
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Vidyard posts

          Mailchimp logo

          Mailchimp

          22.7K
          1.2K
          Easy email newsletters
          22.7K
          1.2K
          PROS OF MAILCHIMP
          • 259
            Smooth setup & ui
          • 248
            Mailing list
          • 148
            Robust e-mail creation
          • 120
            Integrates with a lot of external services
          • 109
            Custom templates
          • 59
            Free tier
          • 49
            Great api
          • 42
            Great UI
          • 33
            A/B Testing Subject Lines
          • 30
            Broad feature set
          • 11
            Subscriber Analytics
          • 9
            Great interface. The standard for email marketing
          • 8
            Great documentation
          • 8
            Mandrill integration
          • 7
            Segmentation
          • 6
            Best deliverability; helps you be the good guy
          • 5
            Facebook Integration
          • 5
            Autoresponders
          • 3
            Customization
          • 3
            RSS-to-email
          • 3
            Co-branding
          • 3
            Embedded signup forms
          • 2
            Automation
          • 1
            Great logo
          • 1
            Groups
          • 0
            Landing pages
          CONS OF MAILCHIMP
          • 2
            Super expensive
          • 1
            Poor API
          • 1
            Charged based on subscribers as opposed to emails sent

          related Mailchimp posts

          Kirill Shirinkin
          Cloud and DevOps Consultant at mkdev · | 12 upvotes · 697.3K views

          As a small startup we are very conscious about picking up the tools we use to run the project. After suffering with a mess of using at the same time Trello , Slack , Telegram and what not, we arrived at a small set of tools that cover all our current needs. For product management, file sharing, team communication etc we chose Basecamp and couldn't be more happy about it. For Customer Support and Sales Intercom works amazingly well. We are using MailChimp for email marketing since over 4 years and it still covers all our needs. Then on payment side combination of Stripe and Octobat helps us to process all the payments and generate compliant invoices. On techie side we use Rollbar and GitLab (for both code and CI). For corporate email we picked G Suite. That all costs us in total around 300$ a month, which is quite okay.

          See more
          Spenser Coke
          Product Engineer at Loanlink.de · | 9 upvotes · 299.6K views

          When starting a new company and building a new product w/ limited engineering we chose to optimize for expertise and rapid development, landing on Rails API, w/ AngularJS on the front.

          The reality is that we're building a CRUD app, so we considered going w/ vanilla Rails MVC to optimize velocity early on (it may not be sexy, but it gets the job done). Instead, we opted to split the codebase to allow for a richer front-end experience, focus on skill specificity when hiring, and give us the flexibility to be consumed by multiple clients in the future.

          We also considered .NET core or Node.js for the API layer, and React on the front-end, but our experiences dealing with mature Node APIs and the rapid-fire changes that comes with state management in React-land put us off, given our level of experience with those tools.

          We're using GitHub and Trello to track issues and projects, and a plethora of other tools to help the operational team, like Zapier, MailChimp, Google Drive with some basic Vue.js & HTML5 apps for smaller internal-facing web projects.

          See more
          Zoom logo

          Zoom

          1.7K
          155
          Video Conferencing, Web Conferencing, Webinars, Screen Sharing
          1.7K
          155
          PROS OF ZOOM
          • 25
            Web conferencing made easy
          • 16
            Remote control option
          • 13
            Draw on screen
          • 12
            Very reliable
          • 11
            In-meeting chat is pretty good
          • 9
            Free
          • 9
            Pair programming sessions with shared controls
          • 8
            Easy to share meeting links/invites
          • 7
            Good Sound Quality
          • 6
            Cloud recordings for meetings
          • 5
            Great mobile app
          • 4
            Virtual backgrounds
          • 4
            Recording Feature
          • 4
            Other people use it
          • 4
            User Friendly actions
          • 2
            Reactions (emoticons)
          • 2
            Auto reconnecting
          • 2
            Chrome extension is great to easily create meetings
          • 2
            While sharing screen, you can still see your video
          • 2
            Mute all participants at once
          • 2
            When ending the videocall, everybody gets kicked
          • 2
            Different options for blocking chat
          • 1
            Easily share video with audio
          • 1
            /zoom on Slack
          • 1
            Registration form
          • 1
            Meant for business and education
          • 0
            Zoom
          CONS OF ZOOM
          • 20
            Limited time if you are a basic member
          • 14
            Limited Storage
          • 11
            Hate how sharing your screen defaults to Full Screen
          • 10
            Quality isn't great (Free)
          • 9
            No cursor highlight on screenshare.
          • 8
            Potential security flaws
          • 7
            Onboarding process for new users is not intuitive
          • 5
            Virtual background quality isn't good
          • 5
            Security
          • 4
            Editing can be improved
          • 4
            Doesn't handle switching audio sources well
          • 4
            The native calendar is buggy
          • 4
            Dashboard can be improved
          • 3
            Pornographic material displayed
          • 3
            Any body can get in it
          • 3
            Not many emojis
          • 3
            Past chat history is not saved
          • 3
            Recording Feature
          • 3
            En In reality,the chat in the meet not is excelent,noo
          • 3
            Zoom lags a lot

          related Zoom posts

          Yonas Beshawred

          Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

          You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

          Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

          #WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

          See more

          Server side

          We decided to use Python for our backend because it is one of the industry standard languages for data analysis and machine learning. It also has a lot of support due to its large user base.

          • Web Server: We chose Flask because we want to keep our machine learning / data analysis and the web server in the same language. Flask is easy to use and we all have experience with it. Postman will be used for creating and testing APIs due to its convenience.

          • Machine Learning: We decided to go with PyTorch for machine learning since it is one of the most popular libraries. It is also known to have an easier learning curve than other popular libraries such as Tensorflow. This is important because our team lacks ML experience and learning the tool as fast as possible would increase productivity.

          • Data Analysis: Some common Python libraries will be used to analyze our data. These include NumPy, Pandas , and matplotlib. These tools combined will help us learn the properties and characteristics of our data. Jupyter notebook will be used to help organize the data analysis process, and improve the code readability.

          Client side

          • UI: We decided to use React for the UI because it helps organize the data and variables of the application into components, making it very convenient to maintain our dashboard. Since React is one of the most popular front end frameworks right now, there will be a lot of support for it as well as a lot of potential new hires that are familiar with the framework. CSS 3 and HTML5 will be used for the basic styling and structure of the web app, as they are the most widely used front end languages.

          • State Management: We decided to use Redux to manage the state of the application since it works naturally to React. Our team also already has experience working with Redux which gave it a slight edge over the other state management libraries.

          • Data Visualization: We decided to use the React-based library Victory to visualize the data. They have very user friendly documentation on their official website which we find easy to learn from.

          Cache

          • Caching: We decided between Redis and memcached because they are two of the most popular open-source cache engines. We ultimately decided to use Redis to improve our web app performance mainly due to the extra functionalities it provides such as fine-tuning cache contents and durability.

          Database

          • Database: We decided to use a NoSQL database over a relational database because of its flexibility from not having a predefined schema. The user behavior analytics has to be flexible since the data we plan to store may change frequently. We decided on MongoDB because it is lightweight and we can easily host the database with MongoDB Atlas . Everyone on our team also has experience working with MongoDB.

          Infrastructure

          • Deployment: We decided to use Heroku over AWS, Azure, Google Cloud because it is free. Although there are advantages to the other cloud services, Heroku makes the most sense to our team because our primary goal is to build an MVP.

          Other Tools

          • Communication Slack will be used as the primary source of communication. It provides all the features needed for basic discussions. In terms of more interactive meetings, Zoom will be used for its video calls and screen sharing capabilities.

          • Source Control The project will be stored on GitHub and all code changes will be done though pull requests. This will help us keep the codebase clean and make it easy to revert changes when we need to.

          See more
          Wistia logo

          Wistia

          84
          0
          Video marketing software that makes it easy to find, engage, and grow your audience
          84
          0
          PROS OF WISTIA
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF WISTIA
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Wistia posts

              Google Analytics logo

              Google Analytics

              127.5K
              5.1K
              Enterprise-class web analytics.
              127.5K
              5.1K
              PROS OF GOOGLE ANALYTICS
              • 1.5K
                Free
              • 927
                Easy setup
              • 891
                Data visualization
              • 698
                Real-time stats
              • 406
                Comprehensive feature set
              • 182
                Goals tracking
              • 155
                Powerful funnel conversion reporting
              • 139
                Customizable reports
              • 83
                Custom events try
              • 53
                Elastic api
              • 15
                Updated regulary
              • 8
                Interactive Documentation
              • 4
                Google play
              • 3
                Walkman music video playlist
              • 3
                Industry Standard
              • 3
                Advanced ecommerce
              • 2
                Irina
              • 2
                Easy to integrate
              • 2
                Financial Management Challenges -2015h
              • 2
                Medium / Channel data split
              • 2
                Lifesaver
              CONS OF GOOGLE ANALYTICS
              • 11
                Confusing UX/UI
              • 8
                Super complex
              • 6
                Very hard to build out funnels
              • 4
                Poor web performance metrics
              • 3
                Very easy to confuse the user of the analytics
              • 2
                Time spent on page isn't accurate out of the box

              related Google Analytics posts

              Tassanai Singprom

              This is my stack in Application & Data

              JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

              My Utilities Tools

              Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

              My Devops Tools

              Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

              My Business Tools

              Slack

              See more
              Max Musing
              Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 9 upvotes · 372.4K views

              Functionally, Amplitude and Mixpanel are incredibly similar. They both offer almost all the same functionality around tracking and visualizing user actions for analytics. You can track A/B test results in both. We ended up going with Amplitude at BaseDash because it has a more generous free tier for our uses (10 million actions per month, versus Mixpanel's 1000 monthly tracked users).

              Segment isn't meant to compete with these tools, but instead acts as an API to send actions to them, and other analytics tools. If you're just sending event data to one of these tools, you probably don't need Segment. If you're using other analytics tools like Google Analytics and FullStory, Segment makes it easy to send events to all your tools at once.

              See more
              Google Tag Manager logo

              Google Tag Manager

              63.7K
              0
              Quickly and easily update tags and code snippets on your website or mobile app
              63.7K
              0
              PROS OF GOOGLE TAG MANAGER
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF GOOGLE TAG MANAGER
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related Google Tag Manager posts

                  Iva Obrovac
                  Product Marketing Manager at Martian & Machine · | 8 upvotes · 87.4K views

                  Hi,

                  This is a question for best practice regarding Segment and Google Tag Manager. I would love to use Segment and GTM together when we need to implement a lot of additional tools, such as Amplitude, Appsfyler, or any other engagement tool since we can send event data without additional SDK implementation, etc.

                  So, my question is, if you use Segment and Google Tag Manager, how did you define what you will push through Segment and what will you push through Google Tag Manager? For example, when implementing a Facebook Pixel or any other 3rd party marketing tag?

                  From my point of view, implementing marketing pixels should stay in GTM because of the tag/trigger control.

                  If you are using Segment and GTM together, I would love to learn more about your best practice.

                  Thanks!

                  See more
                  Mixpanel logo

                  Mixpanel

                  7.1K
                  438
                  Powerful, self-serve product analytics to help you convert, engage, and retain more users
                  7.1K
                  438
                  PROS OF MIXPANEL
                  • 144
                    Great visualization ui
                  • 108
                    Easy integration
                  • 78
                    Great funnel funcionality
                  • 58
                    Free
                  • 22
                    A wide range of tools
                  • 15
                    Powerful Graph Search
                  • 11
                    Responsive Customer Support
                  • 2
                    Nice reporting
                  CONS OF MIXPANEL
                  • 2
                    Messaging (notification, email) features are weak
                  • 2
                    Paid plans can get expensive
                  • 1
                    Limited dashboard capabilities

                  related Mixpanel posts

                  Max Musing
                  Founder & CEO at BaseDash · | 9 upvotes · 372.4K views

                  Functionally, Amplitude and Mixpanel are incredibly similar. They both offer almost all the same functionality around tracking and visualizing user actions for analytics. You can track A/B test results in both. We ended up going with Amplitude at BaseDash because it has a more generous free tier for our uses (10 million actions per month, versus Mixpanel's 1000 monthly tracked users).

                  Segment isn't meant to compete with these tools, but instead acts as an API to send actions to them, and other analytics tools. If you're just sending event data to one of these tools, you probably don't need Segment. If you're using other analytics tools like Google Analytics and FullStory, Segment makes it easy to send events to all your tools at once.

                  See more
                  Yasmine de Aranda
                  Chief Growth Officer at Huddol · | 7 upvotes · 389.1K views

                  Hi there, we are a seed-stage startup in the personal development space. I am looking at building the marketing stack tool to have an accurate view of the user experience from acquisition through to adoption and retention for our upcoming React Native Mobile app. We qualify for the startup program of Segment and Mixpanel, which seems like a good option to get rolling and scale for free to learn how our current 60K free members will interact in the new subscription-based platform. I was considering AppsFlyer for attribution, and I am now looking at an affordable yet scalable Mobile Marketing tool vs. building in-house. Braze looks great, so does Leanplum, but the price points are 30K to start, which we can't do. I looked at OneSignal, but it doesn't have user flow visualization. I am now looking into Urban Airship and Iterable. Any advice would be much appreciated!

                  See more